Experimental Evidence on the Properties of the California’s Cap and Trade Price Containment Reserve

We report on a series of experiments to examine the properties of California’s Reserve Sale allocation mechanism to be implemented as part of the forthcoming cap and trade program and compare it with an alternative reserve sale mechanism. The proposed reserve sale mechanism allows covered entities to purchase allowances after the primary auction sale at fixed prices. If demand for units is greater the amount supplied in the reserve sale, a Proportional Rationing rule is used to distribute allowances based on submitted request for units. This rule is contrasted with to an alternative rule, Equal Rationing in which allowances are allocated one at a time until the quantity available is exhausted or the participants’ requests are fulfilled. We find Equal Rationing outperforms Proportional Rationing allocating units with higher efficiency at a lower cost to participants. Additionally, we sorted subjects by quiz score, which yielded a significant impact on performance, suggesting that subjects with a better understanding of the environment outperformed their counterparts.

[1]  J. Kagel,et al.  Behavior in Multi-Unit Demand Auctions: Experiments with Uniform Price and Dynamic Vickrey Auctions * , 2001 .

[2]  Steven Gjerstad,et al.  Housing Market Price Tier Movements in an Expansion and Collapse , 2009 .

[3]  Daniel F. Spulber OPTIMAL NONLINEAR PRICING AND CONTINGENT CONTRACTS , 1992 .

[4]  Leslie M. Marx,et al.  Carbon Allowance Auction Design: An Assessment of Options for the United States , 2011, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[5]  R. Engelbrecht-Wiggans,et al.  Multi-unit auctions with uniform prices , 1998 .

[6]  D. Porter,et al.  Radio Spectrum and the Disruptive Clarity of Ronald Coase , 2010, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[7]  David McAdams,et al.  Carbon Allowance Auction Design: An Assessment of Options for the U.S. , 2010 .

[8]  Roman M. Sheremeta,et al.  Side-Payments and the Costs of Conflict , 2012 .

[9]  Charles N. Noussair,et al.  Allocating priority with auctions An experimental analysis , 1992 .

[10]  Robert Wilson,et al.  Priority Service: Pricing, Investment, and Market Organization , 1987 .

[11]  H. Moulin Priority Rules and Other Asymmetric Rationing Methods , 2000 .

[12]  David Porter,et al.  Reaction to Public Information in Markets: How Much Does Ambiguity Matter? , 2013 .

[13]  Geoffrey Brennan,et al.  Revenue Implications of Money Creation under Leviathan , 1981 .

[14]  W. Pizer,et al.  Balancing Cost and Emissions Certainty: An Allowance Reserve for Cap-and-Trade , 2008 .