The transmission/disequilibrium test and parental-genotype reconstruction for X-chromosomal markers.

Family-based association methods have recently been introduced that allow testing for linkage in the presence of linkage disequilibrium between a marker and a disease even if there is only incomplete parental-marker information. No such tests are currently available for X-linked markers. This report fills this methodological gap by presenting the X-linked sibling transmission/disequilibrium test (XS-TDT) and the X-linked reconstruction-combination transmission/disequilibrium test (XRC-TDT). As do their autosomal counterparts (S-TDT and RC-TDT), these tests make no assumption about the mode of inheritance of the disease and the ascertainment of the sample. They protect against spurious association due to population stratification. The two tests were compared by simulations, which show that (1) the X-linked RC-TDT is, in general, considerably more powerful than the X-linked S-TDT and (2) the lack of parental-genotype information can be offset by the typing of a sufficient number of sibling controls. A freely available SAS implementation of these tests allows the calculation of exact P values.

[1]  Jurg Ott,et al.  Family-based association studies support a sexually dimorphic effect of COMT and MAOA on genetic susceptibility to obsessive-compulsive disorder , 1999, Biological Psychiatry.

[2]  W. Ewens,et al.  A sibship test for linkage in the presence of association: the sib transmission/disequilibrium test. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[3]  Daniel Rabinowitz,et al.  A Unified Approach to Adjusting Association Tests for Population Admixture with Arbitrary Pedigree Structure and Arbitrary Missing Marker Information , 2000, Human Heredity.

[4]  M Knapp,et al.  The transmission/disequilibrium test and parental-genotype reconstruction: the reconstruction-combined transmission/ disequilibrium test. , 1999, American journal of human genetics.

[5]  M. Knapp Using exact P values to compare the power between the reconstruction-combined transmission/disequilibrium test and the sib transmission/disequilibrium test. , 1999, American journal of human genetics.

[6]  N M Laird,et al.  A discordant-sibship test for disequilibrium and linkage: no need for parental data. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[7]  W. Ewens,et al.  Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[8]  D J Schaid,et al.  Use of parents, sibs, and unrelated controls for detection of associations between genetic markers and disease. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[9]  G. Bubley,et al.  Mutation of the androgen-receptor gene in metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  S. Klauck,et al.  Sixth World Congress of Psychiatric Genetics X Chromosome Workshop. , 1999 .

[11]  A. Monaco,et al.  Refined linkage disequilibrium and physical mapping of the gene locus for X-linked dystonia-parkinsonism (DYT3). , 1999, Genomics.

[12]  M. Boehnke,et al.  Genetic association mapping based on discordant sib pairs: the discordant-alleles test. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[13]  D. Curtis,et al.  Use of siblings as controls in case‐control association studies , 1997, Annals of human genetics.