Contracting, equal, and expanding learning schedules: The optimal distribution of learning sessions depends on retention interval

[1]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  The lag effect in secondary school classrooms: Enhancing students’ memory for vocabulary , 2014 .

[2]  Melody Wiseheart,et al.  Contracting, equal, and expanding learning schedules: The optimal distribution of learning sessions depends on retention interval , 2014, Memory & Cognition.

[3]  Hermann Ebbinghaus (1885) Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology , 2013, Annals of Neurosciences.

[4]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  The lag effect in secondary school classrooms: Enhancing students’ memory for vocabulary , 2013, Instructional Science.

[5]  Hermann Ebbinghaus,et al.  Memory: a contribution to experimental psychology. , 1987, Annals of neurosciences.

[6]  O. Koenig,et al.  Influence of Multiple-Day Temporal Distribution of Repetitions on Memory: A Comparison of Uniform, Expanding, and Contracting Schedules , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Encoding, maintenance, and retrieval processes in the lag effect: A multinomial processing tree analysis , 2012, Memory.

[8]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Spaced retrieval: absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  S. Levinson,et al.  WEIRD languages have misled us, too , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[10]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Is expanding retrieval a superior method for learning text materials? , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[11]  Ed Vul,et al.  Predicting the Optimal Spacing of Study: A Multiscale Context Model of Memory , 2009, NIPS.

[12]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Optimizing distributed practice: theoretical analysis and practical implications. , 2009, Experimental psychology.

[13]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own? , 2009, Memory.

[14]  Robert V. Lindsey,et al.  Optimizing Memory Retention with Cognitive Models , 2009 .

[15]  John R Anderson,et al.  Using a model to compute the optimal schedule of practice. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[16]  David A. Balota,et al.  Expanded vs. Equal Interval Spaced Retrieval Practice: Exploring Different Schedules of Spacing and Retention Interval in Younger and Older Adults , 2008, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.

[17]  H. Pashler,et al.  Spacing effects in learning: A temporal ridgeline of optimal retention learning: , 2008 .

[18]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  Shana K. Carpenter,et al.  Enhancing learning and retarding forgetting: Choices and consequences , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  D. Balota,et al.  Is Expanded Retrieval Practice a Superior Form of Spaced Retrieval? A Critical Review of the Extant Literature. , 2007 .

[21]  H. Pashler,et al.  Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  Shana K. Carpenter,et al.  Application of the Testing and Spacing Effects to Name Learning , 2005 .

[23]  H. Pashler,et al.  When does feedback facilitate learning of words? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers,et al.  Spacing and repetition effects in human memory: application of the SAM model , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[25]  T. Toppino,et al.  The spacing effect in the free recall of homogeneous lists: Present and accounted for , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[26]  J. Staddon,et al.  Habituation, memory and the brain: the dynamics of interval timing , 2002, Behavioural Processes.

[27]  William L. Cull,et al.  Untangling the benefits of multiple study opportunities and repeated testing for cued recall , 2000 .

[28]  D C Rubin,et al.  The spacing effect depends on an encoding deficit, retrieval, and time in working memory: evidence from once-presented words. , 1998, Memory.

[29]  William L. Cull,et al.  Expanding understanding of the expanding-pattern-of-retrieval mnemonic: Toward confidence in applicability , 1996 .

[30]  Harry P. Bahrick,et al.  Lifetime maintenance of high school mathematics content. , 1991 .

[31]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 , 1995 .

[32]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[33]  Francis S. Bellezza,et al.  Chunking of repeated events in memory , 1989 .

[34]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Spacing repetitions over 1 week , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[35]  P. E. Morris,et al.  Practical aspects of memory , 1980 .

[36]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition , 1979, Memory & cognition.

[37]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning , 1978 .

[38]  P. R. D’Agostino,et al.  Effects of repetition as a function of study-phase retrieval , 1976 .

[39]  C. B. Colby The weirdest people in the world , 1973 .

[40]  W. Estes Statistical theory of distributional phenomena in learning. , 1955, Psychological review.

[41]  L. S. Tsai The relation of retention to the distribution of relearning. , 1927 .