Resolution of blur in the older eye: neural compensation in addition to optics?

This study examined the roles of pupillary miosis and experience-mediated compensation in older observers' superior ability to read optically blurred text. The size thresholds of younger and older adult observers for reading common words and identifying line drawings of everyday objects were compared with natural and artificial pupils as a function of systematically varied far letter acuity: best corrected, 20/30, and 20/40. With best corrected letter acuity, younger observers' size thresholds for reading words were lower than those of older observers with either natural or artificial pupils. In the 20/40 condition, however, older observers' reading size thresholds with natural pupils were significantly lower than those of the young. No significant age differences were seen at 20/30 or 20/40 on word reading with artificial pupils or on line drawing identification size thresholds with either pupil type. Prior blur experience, as estimated from observers' presenting and best optical corrections, was inversely associated with older adults' word acuity. Pupillary miosis in conjunction with neural compensation appears to account for older observers' greater ability to read blurred text.

[1]  J. F. Sturr,et al.  The effects of age and ocular health on letter contrast sensitivity and high and medium contrast acuity as a function of luminance , 1991 .

[2]  D. Whitaker,et al.  Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  James R Tresilian,et al.  Improving vision: neural compensation for optical defocus , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  D Whitaker,et al.  Visual acuity changes throughout adulthood in normal, healthy eyes: seeing beyond 6/6. , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[5]  Pablo Artal,et al.  Impact of scattering and spherical aberration in contrast sensitivity. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[6]  David R Williams,et al.  Neural compensation for the best aberration correction. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[7]  P Artal,et al.  Effects of aging in retinal image quality. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[8]  S. Norrby,et al.  Age‐related changes of defocus‐specific contrast sensitivity in healthy subjects , 2000, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[9]  K. Pesudovs,et al.  Decreased Uncorrected Vision After a Period of Distance Fixation with Spectacle Wear , 1993, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[10]  David Whitaker,et al.  Neural contribution to spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity decline in healthy ageing eyes , 1990, Vision Research.

[11]  Sing-Hang Cheung,et al.  The effect of dioptric blur on reading performance , 2007, Vision Research.

[12]  The effect of different forms of monocular occlusion on measures of central visual function , 1998, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[13]  The effect of different forms of monocular occlusion on measures of central visual function , 1998 .

[14]  D. Kline,et al.  Age, the eye, and the visual channels: contrast sensitivity and response speed. , 1983, Journal of gerontology.

[15]  Gunilla Haegerstrom-Portnoy,et al.  Low contrast vision function predicts subsequent acuity loss in an aged population: the SKI study , 2004, Vision Research.

[16]  Michael A. Webster,et al.  Neural adjustments to image blur , 2010 .

[17]  Cynthia Owsley,et al.  Aging and neural spatial contrast sensitivity: Photopic vision , 1993, Vision Research.

[18]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood , 1982, Vision Research.

[19]  John S Werner,et al.  Aging and blur adaptation. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[20]  M. Rosenfield,et al.  Blur Adaptation and Myopia , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[21]  G E Legge,et al.  Tolerance to visual defocus. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[22]  I L Bailey,et al.  New Design Principles for Visual Acuity Letter Charts* , 1976, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[23]  J. M. Woodhouse,et al.  The effect of pupil size on grating detection at various contrast levels , 1975, Vision Research.

[24]  David R Williams,et al.  Neural compensation for the eye's optical aberrations. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[25]  D. Kline,et al.  Senescent effects on binocular summation for contrast sensitivity and spatial interval acuity , 2003, Current eye research.

[26]  Mark Rosenfield,et al.  Blur Adaptation in Myopes , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[27]  C. Owsley,et al.  Aging, senile miosis and spatial contrast sensitivity at low luminance , 1988, Vision Research.

[28]  M J Cox,et al.  Effect of aging on the monochromatic aberrations of the human eye. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[29]  D. Kline,et al.  Aging effects on the identification of digitally blurred text, scenes and faces: Evidence for optical compensation on everyday tasks in the senescent eye , 2002 .

[30]  Donald W. Kline,et al.  Older Observers' Tolerance of Optical Blur: Age Differences in the Identification of Defocused Text Signs , 1999, Hum. Factors.