Effect of humic substances and anionic surfactants on the surface charge and performance of reverse osmosis membranes

Streaming potential measurements were used to determine the surface zeta potential of two reverse osmosis (RO) membranes and to investigate the effect of solution chemical composition on membrane surface charge. Performance measurements were performed to evaluate the effect of membrane surface chemistry on membrane flux and rejection. The RO membranes evaluated were a thin-film composite polyamide membrane and an asymmetric cellulose acetate membrane. The solution chemistries investigated include Suwannee River humic acid and sodium dodecyl sulfate (an anionic surfactant). Zeta potential measurements revealed that in the presence of an indifferent electrolyte, both membranes had a positive zeta potential in the low pH range, passed through an isoelectric point between pH 2 and 3, and had a negative zeta potential in the mid to high pH range. Suwannee River humic acid and sodium dodecyl sulfate were found to readily adsorb to the membrane surface and markedly influence the membrane surface charge. Suwannee River humic acid had a significant influence on salt rejection at low pH where adsorption of the organic macromolecules caused a change in sign of the zeta potential (from positive to negative) and therefore a change in co-ion exclusion effects. The effects of the sodium dodecyl sulfate, also more apparent at low pH, were attributed to the formation of hemimicelles which caused decreased flux and increased salt rejection.

[1]  Ruben D. Cohen,et al.  Colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis membranes , 1986 .

[2]  H. Abramson.  Electrokinetic Phenomena and their Application to Biology and Medicine. , 1934 .

[3]  Zollars,et al.  Adsorption of Single Anionic Surfactants on Hydrophobic Surfaces. , 1996, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[4]  F. P. Cuperus,et al.  Characterization of UF membranes. Membrane characteristics and characterization techniques , 1991 .

[5]  F. Fairbrother,et al.  CCCXII.—Studies in electro-endosmosis. Part I , 1924 .

[6]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  Membrane Filtration of Coagulated Suspensions , 1989 .

[7]  Scott B. McCray,et al.  Reverse osmosis technology : Bipin S. Parekh (Ed.), Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY, 1988, 516 pp., $99.75 (US). , 1990 .

[8]  R. J. Petersen,et al.  Composite reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes , 1993 .

[9]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Fouling of Reverse Osmosis Membranes by Aluminum Oxide Colloids , 1995 .

[10]  J. Schurz,et al.  Characterization of polymer surfaces by means of electrokinetic measurements , 1988 .

[11]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes , 1996 .

[12]  S. S. Wang,et al.  A critical review of fouling of reverse osmosis membranes , 1981 .

[13]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Particle Deposition onto a Permeable Surface in Laminar Flow , 1995 .

[14]  D. Fuerstenau,et al.  Mechanisms of Alkyl Sulfonate Adsorption at the Alumina-Water Interface1 , 1966 .

[15]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Measuring the zeta (electrokinetic) potential of reverse osmosis membranes by a streaming potential analyzer , 1994 .

[16]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes , 1997 .

[17]  Gun Trägårdh,et al.  The effect of protein fouling in microfiltration and ultrafiltration on permeate flux, protein retention and selectivity: A literature review , 1993 .

[18]  Michael T. Brunelle.  Colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis membranes , 1980 .

[19]  Marilyn Barger,et al.  FOULING PREDICTION IN REVERSE OSMOSIS PROCESSES , 1991 .