Plastic damage analysis of oil and gas pipelines with unconstrained and constrained dents

Abstract Indentation resulting from mechanical damage is one of the main causes of pipeline rupture failure. The primary objective of this case study is to analyze the plastic damage of the pipelines with unconstrained and constrained dents using the existing plastic damage model, namely, the ductile failure damage indicator (DFDI) model. As part of this study, an attempt is made to clarify the influence of the constraint on the behavior of the pipeline. The investigation indicates that the plastic damage of the pipeline interior walls outweighs that of the pipeline exterior walls and cracks start frequently from the pipe interior walls. The position of the maximal circumferential plastic damage deviates from the deepest position of the dent when the critical displacement loading arriving due to the circumferential deformation of the pipeline. The total plastic damage of the unconstrained dented pipeline only depends on the initial displacement loading because the working pressure has very little influence on its behavior under the unconstrained condition. However, the total plastic damage of the constrained dented pipeline depends on the initial displacement loading and the working pressure because the working pressure has a significant effect on its behavior under the constrained condition. Under the same condition, the constrained dented pipeline is easier to crack compared to the unconstrained dented pipeline. In this paper, the model, results and the findings are summarized and discussed.

[1]  Fernando Dotta,et al.  Structural integrity assessments of high pressure pipelines with axial flaws using a micromechanics model , 2004 .

[2]  T. Børvik,et al.  A computational model of viscoplasticity and ductile damage for impact and penetration , 2001 .

[3]  Iain Colquhoun,et al.  Strain-Based Models for Dent Assessment: A Review , 2008 .

[4]  Guy Pluvinage,et al.  Evaluation of the effect of corrosion defects on the structural integrity of X52 gas pipelines using the SINTAP procedure and notch theory , 2007 .

[5]  Andrew Cosham,et al.  The effect of dents in pipelines—guidance in the pipeline defect assessment manual , 2004 .

[6]  M. Ortiz,et al.  Adaptive Lagrangian modelling of ballistic penetration of metallic targets , 1997 .

[7]  Tomasz Wierzbicki,et al.  DUCTILE FRACTURE CHARACTERIZATION OF ALUMINUM ALLOY 2024-T351 USING DAMAGE PLASTICITY THEORY , 2009 .

[8]  C. Schmitt,et al.  Study of the influence of dent depth on the critical pressure of pipeline , 2012 .

[9]  C. Schmitt,et al.  Assessment of a gouge and dent defect in a pipeline by a combined criterion , 2014 .

[10]  G. R. Johnson,et al.  Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures , 1985 .

[11]  Chao Sun,et al.  Calculation of Strains in Dents Based on High Resolution In-Line Caliper Survey , 2006 .

[12]  Chris Alexander,et al.  METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING THE EFFECTS OF PLAIN DENTS, WRINKLE BENDS, AND MECHANICAL DAMAGE ON PIPELINE INTEGRITY , 2007 .

[13]  Ming Gao,et al.  An Approach for Evaluating and Prioritizing Dents for Remediation as Reported by ILI Tools , 2010 .

[14]  D. M. Tracey,et al.  On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields , 1969 .

[15]  J. Hancock,et al.  On the mechanisms of ductile failure in high-strength steels subjected to multi-axial stress-states , 1976 .