Investigative monitoring within the European Water Framework Directive: a coastal blast furnace slag disposal, as an example.

The European Water Framework Directive (WFD) establishes a framework for the protection of estuarine and coastal waters, with the most important objective being to achieve 'good ecological status' for all waters, by 2015. Hence, Member States are establishing programmes for the monitoring of water quality status, through the assessment of ecological and chemical elements. These monitoring programmes can be of three types: surveillance monitoring; operational monitoring (both undertaken on a routine basis); and investigative monitoring (carried out where the reason of any exceedance for ecological and chemical status is unknown). Until now, nothing has been developed in relation to investigative monitoring and no clear guidance exists for this type of monitoring, as it must be tackled on a 'case-by-case' basis. Consequently, the present study uses slag disposal from a blast furnace, into a coastal area, as a case-study in the implementation of investigative monitoring, according to the WFD. In order to investigate the potential threat of such slags, this contribution includes: a geophysical study, to determine the extent of the disposal area; sediment analysis; a chemical metal analysis; and an ecotoxicological study (including a Microtox test and an amphipod bioassay). The results show that metal concentrations are several times above the background concentration. However, only one of the stations showed toxicity after acute toxicological tests, with the benthic communities being in a good status. The approaches used here show that contaminants are not bioavailable and that no management actions are required with the slags.

[1]  J. Guinan,et al.  Multiscale Terrain Analysis of Multibeam Bathymetry Data for Habitat Mapping on the Continental Slope , 2007 .

[2]  M. Elliott,et al.  Marine monitoring: Its shortcomings and mismatch with the EU Water Framework Directive's objectives. , 2006, Marine pollution bulletin.

[3]  B. Burd Evaluation of mine tailings effects on a benthic marine infaunal community over 29 years. , 2002, Marine environmental research.

[4]  G. Scott,et al.  Sediment quality of the Neuse River estuary, North Carolina: an integrated assessment of sediment contamination, toxicity, and condition of benthic fauna , 2002 .

[5]  Á. Borja,et al.  Implementing the European Water Framework Directive: the debate continues... , 2005, Marine pollution bulletin.

[6]  Ibon Galparsoro,et al.  The European Water Framework Directive and the DPSIR, a methodological approach to assess the risk of failing to achieve good ecological status , 2006 .

[7]  Fred D. Calder,et al.  Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentrations in marine and estuarine sediments , 1995 .

[8]  G. M. Degraeve,et al.  Sediment quality guidelines and assessment: overview and research needs , 2000 .

[9]  Branislav Vrana,et al.  A "toolbox" for biological and chemical monitoring requirements for the European Union's Water Framework Directive. , 2006, Talanta.

[10]  P. Chapman Do not disregard the benthos in sediment quality assessments! , 2007, Marine pollution bulletin.

[11]  M. Posey,et al.  Sediment quality of North Carolina estuaries: an integrative assessment of sediment contamination, toxicity, and condition of benthic fauna , 2000 .

[12]  F. Andersen,et al.  Determination of organic carbon in marine sediments: a comparison of two CHN-analyzer methods , 1987 .

[13]  W. Salomons,et al.  Trace metal analysis on polluted sediments , 1980 .

[14]  M. J. Belzunce,et al.  Using sediment quality guidelines for dredged material management in commercial ports from Spain. , 2006, Environment international.

[15]  J. Correa,et al.  A sediment quality triad assessment of the impact of copper mine tailings disposal on the littoral sedimentary environment in the Atacama region of northern Chile. , 2006, Marine pollution bulletin.

[16]  A. Geffard,et al.  Relationship between the lability of sediment-bound metals (Cd, Cu, Zn) and their bioaccumulation in benthic invertebrates , 2007 .

[17]  E. Papathanassiou,et al.  The use of a biotic index (Bentix) in assessing long-term effects of dumping coarse metalliferous waste on soft bottom benthic communities , 2007 .

[18]  J. F. Paul,et al.  Misfit Between Sediment Toxicity and Chemistry , 2000 .

[19]  D. Loring,et al.  Manual for the geochemical analyses of marine sediments and suspended particulate matter , 1992 .

[20]  Ulrich Förstner Sediment-associated contaminants — an overview of scientific bases for developing remedial options , 1987 .

[21]  Angel Borja,et al.  An approach to the intercalibration of benthic ecological status assessment in the North Atlantic ecoregion, according to the European Water Framework Directive. , 2007, Marine pollution bulletin.

[22]  I. Muxika,et al.  The water framework directive: water alone, or in association with sediment and biota, in determining quality standards? , 2004, Marine pollution bulletin.

[23]  N. Vdović,et al.  Remobilization of metals from slag and polluted sediments (case study: the canal of the Deûle River, northern France). , 2006, Environmental pollution.

[24]  Ángel Borja,et al.  A Marine Biotic Index to Establish the Ecological Quality of Soft-Bottom Benthos Within European Estuarine and Coastal Environments , 2000 .

[25]  Á. Borja,et al.  Maximum likelihood mixture estimation to determine metal background values in estuarine and coastal sediments within the European Water Framework Directive. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[26]  Peter M Chapman,et al.  Determining when contamination is pollution - weight of evidence determinations for sediments and effluents. , 2007, Environment international.

[27]  Mark Crane,et al.  Proposed development of Sediment Quality Guidelines under the European Water Framework Directive: a critique. , 2003, Toxicology letters.

[28]  Juan Bald,et al.  Implementation of the European water framework directive from the Basque country (northern Spain): a methodological approach. , 2004, Marine pollution bulletin.

[29]  Juan Bald,et al.  Using historical data, expert judgement and multivariate analysis in assessing reference conditions and benthic ecological status, according to the European Water Framework Directive. , 2007, Marine pollution bulletin.

[30]  Peter Dartnell,et al.  Geomorphology, acoustic backscatter, and processes in Santa Monica Bay from multibeam mapping. , 2003, Marine environmental research.

[31]  Á. Borja,et al.  Accumulation of organic matter, heavy metals and organic compounds in surface sediments along the Nervión Estuary (northern Spain). , 2001, Marine pollution bulletin.

[32]  M. R. Anderson,et al.  State of the marine environment at Little Bay Arm, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, 10 years after a "do nothing" response to a mine tailings spill. , 2003, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[33]  Inmaculada Riba,et al.  Acid mine drainage pollution in the Tinto and Odiel rivers (Iberian Pyrite Belt, SW Spain) and bioavailability of the transported metals to the Huelva Estuary. , 2007, Environment international.

[34]  Joop Harmsen,et al.  Measuring bioavailability: from a scientific approach to standard methods. , 2007, Journal of environmental quality.

[35]  Sediment quality in Los Angeles Harbor, USA: A triad assessment , 2001, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[36]  T. Campisi,et al.  Effect of sediment turbidity and color on light output measurement for Microtox Basic Solid-Phase Test. , 2005, Chemosphere.

[37]  Ángel Borja,et al.  The European water framework directive: A challenge for nearshore, coastal and continental shelf research , 2005 .