Effect of rotary instrumentation on composite bond strength with simulated pulpal pressure.

This study evaluated the effect of cutting teeth with different types of burs at various speeds on shear bond strength using Prime and Bond NT (Dentsply/DeTrey). A simulated pulpal pressure of 25-mmHg, equivalent to 34 cmH2O, was created in a false pulpal chamber filled with distilled water and maintained for seven days. The human teeth were divided into six groups of 10 teeth each: fine grit straight fissure diamond bur in air rotor (DA), fine grit straight fissure diamond bur in micromotor (DM), crosscut fissure carbide bur in air rotor (CCA), crosscut fissure carbide bur in micromotor (CCM), plain fissure carbide bur in micromotor (CM) and #600-grit silicon carbide paper (SiC). The tooth surfaces in these groups were cut under copious air-water spray and treated with Prime and Bond NT after etching with 38% phosphoric acid. Composite restorations were then prepared with TPH spectrum (Dentsply/ DeTrey). After soaking in water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours, the specimens were loaded at a 45 degrees angle to their longitudinal axes by using a Z 010 Universal Testing Machine (Zwick), and shear bond strengths were determined at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/minute. All of the specimens were then observed under Stereomicroscope at 10x. Statistical analysis was made using one-way and two-way ANOVA and t-test (p < 0.05). The bond strengths achieved with a fine grit straight fissure diamond bur, a crosscut fissure carbide bur in air rotor and a crosscut fissure carbide bur in micromotor, were significantly higher than a fine grit straight fissure diamond bur, a plain fissure carbide bur and #600-grit silicon carbide abrasive paper in the micromotor. Therefore, selecting an appropriate bur and its speed may improve bonding for adhesive systems, although crosscut fissure carbide burs produced high bond strengths at either speed used.

[1]  V. Thompson,et al.  Effect of bur cutting patterns and dentin bonding agents on dentin permeability in a fluid flow model. , 2003, Operative dentistry.

[2]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. , 2003, Operative dentistry.

[3]  J. Tagami,et al.  Effect of self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid etchant on bonding to bur-prepared dentin. , 2002, Operative dentistry.

[4]  L. Baratieri,et al.  Dental adhesion: present state of the art and future perspectives. , 2002, Quintessence international.

[5]  P. Wesselink,et al.  Comparison of the in vitro permeability of human dentine according to the dentinal region and the composition of the simulated dentinal fluid. , 2002, Journal of dentistry.

[6]  C. Dörfer,et al.  Effect of intrapulpal pressure simulation in vitro on shear bond strengths and hybrid layer formation. , 2001, American journal of dentistry.

[7]  A. Cederlund,et al.  Acid conditioning combined with single-component and two-component dentin bonding agents. , 2001, Quintessence international.

[8]  J Tagami,et al.  Effects of different burs on dentin bond strengths of self-etching primer bonding systems. , 2001, Operative dentistry.

[9]  D. Pashley,et al.  Bonding characteristics to dentin walls of class II cavities, in vitro. , 2001, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[10]  N. Akkas,et al.  Fracture resistance of Class II approximal slot restorations. , 2000, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[11]  D G Stone,et al.  Restorative dentistry: High and low torque handpieces: cutting dynamics, enamel cracking and tooth temperature , 2000, British Dental Journal.

[12]  J. Perdigão,et al.  Bond strengths of nonrinsing adhesives. , 2000, Quintessence international.

[13]  M. Burrow,et al.  Effects of Dentin Depth and Cavity Configuration on Bond Strength , 1999, Journal of dental research.

[14]  J. Perdigão,et al.  Laboratory evaluation and clinical application of a new one-bottle adhesive. , 1999, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[15]  S D Yaman,et al.  Analysis of stress distribution in a maxillary central incisor subjected to various post and core applications. , 1998, Journal of endodontics.

[16]  Á. Della Bona,et al.  The effect of amalgam bonding on resistance form of Class II amalgam restorations. , 1998, Quintessence international.

[17]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  The interaction of adhesive systems with human dentin. , 1996, American journal of dentistry.

[18]  P. B. Warren,et al.  A mathematical model of potassium ion diffusion in dentinal tubules. , 1996, Archives of oral biology.

[19]  Meiers Jc,et al.  Shear bond strength of resin to acid/pumice-microabraded enamel. , 1995 .

[20]  M. Burrow,et al.  Effect of pulpal pressure on adhesion of resin composite to dentin: bovine serum versus saline. , 1995, Quintessence international.

[21]  D. Pashley,et al.  Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. , 1995, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[22]  N. Nakabayashi,et al.  Bonding to Ground Dentin by a Phenyl-P Self -etching Primer , 1994, Journal of dental research.

[23]  Á. Della Bona,et al.  The strength of Class II composite resin restorations as affected by preparation design. , 1994, Quintessence international.

[24]  J. Mitchem,et al.  Adhesion to dentin with and without smear layer under varying degrees of wetness. , 1991, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[25]  J. Mitchem,et al.  Bonding of resin dentin adhesives under simulated physiological conditions. , 1988, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[26]  C. Davidson,et al.  Setting Stress in Composite Resin in Relation to Configuration of the Restoration , 1987, Journal of dental research.

[27]  C. Davidson,et al.  The Competition between the Composite-Dentin Bond Strength and the Polymerization Contraction Stress , 1984, Journal of dental research.

[28]  D. Pashley Smear layer: physiological considerations. , 1984, Operative dentistry. Supplement.

[29]  C. Svare,et al.  Dentinal smearing: an investigation of the phenomenon. , 1980, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[30]  D. Pashley,et al.  Regional resistances to fluid flow in human dentine in vitro. , 1978, Archives of oral biology.

[31]  J. Eick,et al.  Surface Topography: Its Influence on Wetting and Adhesion in a Dental Adhesive System , 1972, Journal of dental research.

[32]  H. V. Hassel Physiology of the human dental pulp. , 1971 .

[33]  J. Eick,et al.  Scanning Electron Microscopy of Cut Tooth Surfaces and Identification of Debris by Use of the Electron Microprobe , 1970, Journal of dental research.

[34]  L. Lindén,et al.  Movement of Dentinal and Pulpal Fluid Caused by Clinical Procedures , 1968, Journal of dental research.