Metateams in major information technology projects : a grounded theory on conflict, trust, communication, and cost

Metateams are both largely unexplored in the IS literature and economically important to major corporations and their IT vendors. Metateams are temporary groups composed of two or more geographically and inter-organisationally dispersed teams, commercially linked by project-specific agreements and enabled by electronic means of communication. Each one of these teams fulfils a particular and measurable objective, enshrined in the team's goal hierarchy and contractual obligations. The combination of efforts from every team in a metateam, contributes to achieving a common distant goal of project implementation. Thus, metateams are temporary teams (or groups) of distributed teams working across distance, firms, and cultures. In metateams, each participant team works with other teams on organisationally heterogeneous collaborative projects. Metateams are new and potentially powerful work structures resulting from the convergence of outsourcing, virtual organisations, and demands for global competitiveness. They promise to build IT solutions of high complexity, by integrating expertise from different fields and organisations. With the assistance of communication technologies, metateams can conquer barriers of time and space, enabling collaborative endeavours across a nation or across the globe. In a global business environment that demands innovation, flexibility, and responsiveness, metateams represent a revolution in the way organisations and practitioners do IT projects. However, as this study found, managing metateams presents unique difficulties due to conflicting demands arising from multiple realities. This dissertation presents an empirical research using a grounded theory approach that studies a major IT project performed by a metateam. The conceptual account emerges from an exploratory study of a major IT development and implementation project in the telecommunication industry. The project involved three key organisations and teams based in Australia, the Middle East, and Eastern Europe. The core pattern emerging from this study is one of constant conflict discovery and resolution, a process that progressively, and at a cost, allows the project to evolve from its initial incongruence into either a working solution or into project abandonment. This theory-building study presents a theoretical model, grounded on rich empirical data, interrelating key concepts of cost, conflict, communication, and trust, which serves to explain the pattern of actions and to propose a number of practical conclusions and recommendations. This research was guided by two key research objectives: (a) to add theoretical content to the understanding of key processes enacted by metateams in performing IT project work; and (b), to develop a framework that assists researchers and practitioners in predicting, explaining, and evaluating events and process associated with metateams. To the author's best knowledge, this study describes for the first time in the IS literature, the metateam organisation and the significant contextual issues they confront. In doing so, the study develops an understanding, grounded on rich empirical data from the substantive field of metateams. This new understanding contributes to both IS research and practice and provides guidance for future research.

[1]  Tom DeMarco,et al.  Peopleware: Productive Projects and Teams , 1987 .

[2]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  The choice of qualitative methods in IS research , 2001 .

[3]  David L. Bradford,et al.  Influence Without Authority , 1989 .

[4]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Getting It Together: Temporal Coordination and Conflict Management in Global Virtual Teams , 2001 .

[5]  Bernard C. Y. Tan,et al.  A dialogue technique to enhance electronic communication in virtual teams , 2000 .

[6]  E. G. Furubotn,et al.  Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics , 2005 .

[7]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[8]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[9]  E. Lorenz Trust, Contract and Economic Cooperation , 1999 .

[10]  Erik D. Goodman,et al.  New methods for studying global virtual teams: towards a multi-faceted approach , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[11]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[12]  Bernard Barber,et al.  The Logic and Limits of Trust , 1983 .

[13]  Karl R. Popper The Logic of Scientific Discovery. , 1977 .

[14]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[15]  B. Glaser Conceptualization: On Theory and Theorizing Using Grounded Theory , 2002 .

[16]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities , 1999, MIS Q..

[17]  William G. Olchi The Transmission of Control Through Organizational Hierarchy , 1978 .

[18]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[19]  Sharon F. Rallis,et al.  The Qualitative-Quantitative Debate: New Perspectives. , 1994 .

[20]  O. Williamson,et al.  The mechanisms of governance , 1996 .

[21]  J. Roberto Evaristo,et al.  Collaborative Infrastructure Formation in Virtual Projects , 2002 .

[22]  Benson Rosen,et al.  Virtual team effectiveness: a proposed research agenda , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[23]  Gregory A. Bigley,et al.  Straining for Shared Meaning in Organization Science: Problems of Trust and Distrust , 1998 .

[24]  C. Urquhart An encounter with grounded theory: tackling the practical and philosophical issues , 2001 .

[25]  Walter Fernandez,et al.  Metateams in Major IT Projects: A Preliminary Study , 2001 .

[26]  Charles Hampden-Turner,et al.  Riding the waves of culture : understanding cultural diversity in global business , 1998 .

[27]  Jeffrey Stamps,et al.  Virtual teams: The new way to work , 1999 .

[28]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[29]  R. Hirschheim,et al.  Information systems outsourcing : myths, metaphors, and realities , 1993 .

[30]  M. Rahim,et al.  A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. , 1983, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[31]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and refutations;: The growth of scientific knowledge , 1972 .

[32]  James J. Jiang,et al.  The Relative Influence of IS Project Implementation Policies and Project Leadership on Eventual Outcomes , 2001 .

[33]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  Managing participative diversity in virtual teams: requirements for collaborative technology support , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[34]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Research on teams with multiple boundaries , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[35]  J. Rotter A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. , 1967, Journal of personality.

[36]  K. Arrow The limits of organization , 1974 .

[37]  van der Geert Vegt,et al.  Effects of Interdependencies in Project Teams , 1999 .

[38]  Michael A. West,et al.  The human team: Basic motivations and innovations , 2001 .

[39]  J. Creswell Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[40]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Misattribution and attributional redirection in distributed virtual groups , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[41]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Computer-mediated and face-to-face groups: who makes riskier decisions? , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[42]  Loizos Heracleous,et al.  Organizational Change as Discourse: Communicative Actions and Deep Structures in the Context of Information Technology Implementation , 2001 .

[43]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[44]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media , 1992 .

[45]  Audris Mockus,et al.  Shared Mental Models, Familiarity, and Coordination: A Multi-Method Study of Distributed Software Teams , 2002, ICIS.

[46]  Allen C. Amason,et al.  The Effects of Top Management Team Size and interaction Norms on Cognitive and Affective Conflict , 1997 .

[47]  B. Glaser The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization Contrasted With Description , 2001 .

[48]  Lynda C. McDermott,et al.  World Class Teams: Working Across Borders , 1998 .

[49]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  CONFLICT AND SHARED IDENTITY IN GEOGRAPHICALLY DISTRIBUTED TEAMS , 2001 .

[50]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  Managing a virtual workplace , 2000 .

[51]  Renata Tesch,et al.  Qualitative research : analysis types and software tools , 1990 .

[52]  Aidan R. Vining,et al.  A conceptual framework for understanding the outsourcing decision , 1999 .

[53]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Using an adapted grounded theory approach for inductive theory building about virtual team development , 2000, DATB.

[54]  K. Weick Theory Construction as Disciplined Reflexivity: Tradeoffs in the 90s , 1999 .

[55]  Gerald M. Weinberg,et al.  Are Your Lights On?: How to Figure Out What the Problem Really is , 1982 .

[56]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Action research: helping organizations to change , 2001 .

[57]  C. Earley,et al.  Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. , 2000 .

[58]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Grounded action research: a method for understanding IT in practice , 1999 .

[59]  I. Dey Qualitative Data Analysis: A User Friendly Guide for Social Scientists , 1993 .

[60]  K. Weick FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[61]  Linda S. Lotto Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .

[62]  Hans Lehmann A grounded theory of international information systems , 2001 .

[63]  M. Deutsch The Resolution of ConflictConstructive and Destructive Processes , 1974 .

[64]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Impact Of Collectivism And In-Group/Out-Group Membership On The Evaluation Generosity Of Team Members , 2000 .

[65]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[66]  N. Ashkanasy,et al.  Communicating trustworthiness and building trust in interorganizational virtual organizations , 2001 .

[67]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Beyond Rigor and Relevance: Producing Consumable Research about Information Systems , 1998 .

[68]  Randolph B. Cooper,et al.  The Effect of Computer-Mediated Communication on Agreement and Acceptance , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[69]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[70]  S. Stout,et al.  Decision Dynamics in Two High Reliability Military Organizations , 1994 .

[71]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[72]  J. Pfeffer Organizations and Organization Theory , 1982 .

[73]  Steven Tadelis,et al.  Incentives Versus Transaction Costs: A Theory of Procurement Contracts , 2001 .

[74]  R. Merton The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy , 1948 .

[75]  Cathy Urquhart,et al.  Regrounding grounded theory or reinforcing old prejudices? A brief reply to Bryant , 2002 .

[76]  D. Partington Building Grounded Theories of Management Action , 2000 .

[77]  Cathy Urquhart,et al.  Exploring analyst-client communication: using grounded theory techniques to investigate interaction in informal requirements gathering , 1997 .

[78]  John Mingers,et al.  Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[79]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Nothing Is Quite So Practical as a Good Theory , 1989 .

[80]  Qing Hu,et al.  Research Report: Diffusion of Information Systems Outsourcing: A Reevaluation of Influence Sources , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[81]  B. Glaser Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence Vs. Forcing , 1992 .

[82]  I. Dey Grounding grounded theory : guidelines for qualitative inquiry , 1999 .

[83]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[84]  J. Senn,et al.  The challenge of relating IS research to practice , 1998 .

[85]  Abbe Mowshowitz,et al.  On the theory of virtual organization , 1997 .

[86]  Vjekoslav Sinkovic,et al.  An approach to schedule estimation and tracking for rapid development projects , 1998, Proceedings. 24th EUROMICRO Conference (Cat. No.98EX204).

[87]  D. E. Stokes Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation , 1997 .

[88]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems , 1997, MIS Q..

[89]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  Resources, Transactions and Rents: Managing Value Through Interfirm Collaborative Relationships , 1998 .

[90]  F. Heider Attitudes and cognitive organization. , 1946, The Journal of psychology.

[91]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Understanding Computer-Mediated Discussions: Positivist and Interpretive Analyses of Group Support System Use , 2000, MIS Q..

[92]  Jessica Lipnack,et al.  Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology , 1997 .

[93]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[94]  Varun Grover,et al.  The Effect of Service Quality and Partnership on the Outsourcing of Information Systems Functions , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[95]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research , 1989 .

[96]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance , 1999, MIS Q..

[97]  Suzanne P. Weisband,et al.  Developing trust in virtual teams , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[98]  U. Neisser Cognitive Psychology. (Book Reviews: Cognition and Reality. Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology) , 1976 .

[99]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future , 1998 .

[100]  A. Pettigrew Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[101]  D. Whetten What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution , 1989 .

[102]  R. Peterson,et al.  Task Conflict snd Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams:The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust. , 1998 .

[103]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology adaption: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team 1 , 2000 .

[104]  F. Heider The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[105]  Kenneth H. Price,et al.  Process and Outcome Expectations for the Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and Consensus Techniques of Strategic Decision Making , 1991 .

[106]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Building an inductive theory of collaboration in virtual teams: an adapted grounded theory approach , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[107]  Hans Lehmann,et al.  Using Grounded Theory with Technology Cases: Distilling Critical Theory from a Multinational Information Systems Development Project , 2001 .

[108]  Donald L. Schilling,et al.  Dynamic Project Management: A Practical Guide for Managers and Engineers , 1989 .

[109]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Situated learning in cross-functional virtual teams , 2000 .

[110]  O. Williamson The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting , 1985 .

[111]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Striking a balance between trust and control in a virtual organization: a content analysis of open source software case studies , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[112]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[113]  K. Weick Making Sense of the Organization , 2000 .

[114]  Allen S. Lee Rigor and relevance in MIS research: beyond the approach of positivism alone , 1999 .

[115]  Jim Suchan,et al.  The communication characteristics of virtual teams: a case study , 2001 .

[116]  Derrick J. Neufeld,et al.  An exploratory study of electronic mail as a rich communication medium in a global virtual organization , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[117]  R. Hirschheim,et al.  Beyond The Information Systems Outsourcing Bandwagon: The Insourcing Response , 1995 .

[118]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[119]  Guy Fitzgerald,et al.  Outsourcing IT: The strategic implications , 1995 .

[120]  A. Bryant Re-grounding Grounded Theory , 2002 .

[121]  A. Bandura Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[122]  Allen S. Lee Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation , 1994, MIS Q..

[123]  Allen C. Amason Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams , 1996 .

[124]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation , 1989 .

[125]  D. Rousseau Psychological contracts in organizations : understanding written and unwritten agreements , 1995 .

[126]  James J. Jiang,et al.  Software Project Risks and Development Focus , 2001 .

[127]  B. Glaser Doing grounded theory : issues and discussions , 1998 .

[128]  Allen S. Lee Challenges to qualitative researchers in information systems , 2001 .

[129]  E. Guba,et al.  Competing paradigms in qualitative research. , 1994 .

[130]  H. Simon,et al.  "Models of Man"@@@Models of Man: Social and Rational. Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. , 1959 .

[131]  D. Cecez-Kecmanovic Doing critical IS research: the question of methodology , 2001 .

[132]  Oliver E. Williamson,et al.  Economic Organization: The Case For Candor , 1996 .

[133]  Stefan Cronholm,et al.  Grounded Theory in Use - a Review of Experiences , 2002 .

[134]  R. Wageman Interdependence and Group Effectiveness , 1995 .

[135]  Steve McConnell,et al.  Rapid Development: Taming Wild Software Schedules , 1996 .

[136]  Colin Robson,et al.  Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers , 1993 .

[137]  Gerben S. van der Vegt,et al.  PATTERNS OF INTERDEPENDENCE IN WORK TEAMS: A TWO‐LEVEL INVESTIGATION OF THE RELATIONS WITH JOB AND TEAM SATISFACTION , 2001 .

[138]  B. Misztal Trust in Modern Societies: The Search for the Bases of Social Order , 1996 .

[139]  Magoroh Maruyama,et al.  THE SECOND CYBERNETICS Deviation-Amplifying Mutual Causal Processes , 1963 .

[140]  Alex P. Alex,et al.  Conflict Resolution Using Cognitive Analysis Approach , 2001 .

[141]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. , 2001 .

[142]  D. Goleman Working with Emotional Intelligence , 1998 .

[143]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[144]  Richard E. Potter,et al.  Understanding Human Interaction and Performance in the Virtual Team , 2002 .

[145]  Kil-Soo Suh,et al.  Impact of communication medium on task performance and satisfaction: an examination of media-richness theory , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[146]  B. Glaser Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory , 1978 .

[147]  T. Parsons The Social System , 1953 .

[148]  Lawrence Loh,et al.  Diffusion of Information Technology Outsourcing: Influence Sources and the Kodak Effect , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[149]  C. Cramton The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[150]  Blake Ives,et al.  The Global Network Organization of the Future: Information Management Opportunities and Challenges , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[151]  Mahesh S. Raisinghani,et al.  An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[152]  K. Jehn A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[153]  Alan Underwood,et al.  Rigour And Relevance In Studies Of IS Innovation : A Grounded Theory Methodology Approach , 2002, ECIS.

[154]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1991 .

[155]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning , 1997, MIS Q..

[156]  D. L. Simms,et al.  Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies , 1986 .

[157]  A. Giddens,et al.  New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. , 1977 .

[158]  Jessica Lipnack,et al.  Virtual Teams: People Working Across Boundaries with Technology, Second Edition , 2000 .

[159]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A classification scheme for interpretive research in information systems , 2001 .

[160]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1997 .

[161]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[162]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  MAXIMIZING THE BENEFITS OF TASK CONFLICT: THE ROLE OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT , 2001 .

[163]  A. Hess,et al.  Maintaining nonvoluntary relationships with disliked partners: an investigation into the use of distancing behaviors , 2000 .