Trend and efficiency analysis of co-authorship network

Although co-authorship in scientific research has a long history the analysis of co-authorship network to explore scientific collaboration among authors is a relatively new research area. Studies of current literature about co-authorship networks mostly give emphasis to understand patterns of scientific collaborations, to capture collaborative statistics, and to propose valid and reliable measures for identifying prominent author(s). However, there is no such study in the literature which conducts a longitudinal analysis of co-authorship networks. Using a dataset that spans over 20 years, this paper attempts to explore efficiency and trend of co-authorship networks. Two scientists are considered connected if they have co-authored a paper, and these types of connections between two scientists eventually constitute co-authorship networks. Co-authorship networks evolve among researchers over time in specific research domains as well as in interdisciplinary research areas. Scientists from diverse research areas and different geographical locations may participate in one specific co-authorship network whereas an individual scientist may belong to different co-authorship networks. In this paper, we study a longitudinal co-authorship network of a specific scientific research area. By applying approaches to analyze longitudinal network data, in addition to known methods and measures of current co-authorship literature, we explore a co-authorship network of a relatively young and emerging research discipline to understand its trend of evolution pattern and proximity of efficiency.

[1]  Johan Bollen,et al.  Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[2]  Cheng-Chung Cho,et al.  Improvements in productivity based on co-authorship: a case study of published articles in China , 2010, Scientometrics.

[3]  András Schubert,et al.  Incremental citation impact due to international co-authorship in Hungarian higher education institutions , 2007, Scientometrics.

[4]  O. Persson,et al.  Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration , 1992 .

[5]  András Schubert,et al.  Using the h-index for assessing single publications , 2009, Scientometrics.

[6]  Jerrold W. Grossman,et al.  A portion of the well-known collaboration graph , 1995 .

[7]  Stuart Dillon,et al.  Authorship patterns in information systems , 1997, Scientometrics.

[8]  Olle Persson,et al.  Locating the network of interacting authors in scientific specialties , 1995, Scientometrics.

[9]  MO Xiu-juan,et al.  Study of the Periodical Paper Co-authorship of Library and Information Science: 1999-2002 , 2009 .

[10]  Marshall H. Medoff,et al.  The efficiency of self-citations in economics , 2006, Scientometrics.

[11]  Olle Persson,et al.  Studying research collaboration using co-authorships , 1996, Scientometrics.

[12]  Yu-Wei Chang,et al.  A study of interdisciplinarity in information science: using direct citation and co-authorship analysis , 2011, J. Inf. Sci..

[13]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar , 2007 .

[15]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  Coauthorship networks of invisible colleges and institutionalized communities , 1994, Scientometrics.

[16]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Studies in scientific collaboration , 1978, Scientometrics.

[17]  M. Newman.  Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Alex Bavelas,et al.  Communication Patterns in Task‐Oriented Groups , 1950 .

[19]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  The citation speed index: A useful bibliometric indicator to add to the h index , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[20]  Mao Lin Huang,et al.  Analysis and Visualization of Co-authorship Networks for Understanding Academic Collaboration and Knowledge Domain of Individual Researchers , 2006, International Conference on Computer Graphics, Imaging and Visualisation (CGIV'06).

[21]  E. S. FOLIASt.  ON THE THEORY OF FRACTURE OF CURVED SHEETS , 2002 .

[22]  Olle Persson,et al.  The measurement of international scientific collaboration , 1993, Scientometrics.

[23]  A. Mullin,et al.  My Brain is Open: The Mathematical Journeys of Paul Erdos.@@@The Man Who Loved Only Numbers: The Story of Paul Erdos and the Search for Mathematical Truth. , 1998 .

[24]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[25]  Albert Einstein,et al.  The Influence of the Expansion of Space on the Gravitation Fields Surrounding the Individual Stars , 1945 .

[26]  John Scott.  Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[27]  E. S. Folias.  On the theory of fracture of curved sheets , 1970 .

[28]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Studies in scientific collaboration , 2005, Scientometrics.

[29]  Paul Erdös,et al.  On linear independence of sequences in a Banach space. , 1953 .

[30]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[31]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.