Maintaining Diversity in an Ant Community: Modeling, Extending, and Testing the Dominance‐Discovery Trade‐Off

Ant communities often consist of many species with apparently similar niches. We present a mathematical model of the dominance‐discovery trade‐off, the trade‐off between the abilities to find and to control resources, showing that it can in principle facilitate the coexistence of large numbers of species. Baiting studies of dominance and discovery abilities in an ant community from the Chiricahua Mountains of Arizona indicate that real communities fail to fit the assumptions of the simple model in several ways: (1) dominance depends on the size of the food resource; (2) for some ants, dominance depends on the presence or absence of specialist parasitoids; (3) pairwise dominance is not an all‐or‐nothing trait; and (4) a consistent negative relationship between pairwise differences in per capita discovery rates and dominance can be detected for only one bait type. Extended models incorporating these factors successfully predict the coexistence of five of the six most abundant members of this community but fail to accurately predict their relative abundances. Sensitivity analysis indicates that each complicating factor enhances the extent of coexistence.

[1]  L. Gilbert,et al.  Parasitoids and competitors influence colony-level responses in the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.

[2]  E. LeBrun,et al.  Who is the top dog in ant communities? Resources, parasitoids, and multiple competitive hierarchies , 2005, Oecologia.

[3]  X. Cerdá,et al.  Prey Size Reverses the Outcome of Interference Interactions of Scavenger Ants , 1998 .

[4]  P. David,et al.  Coexistence in a metacommunity: the competition-colonization trade-off is not dead. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[5]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Defense of food supply by eusocial colonies , 1987 .

[6]  L. Jacobs,et al.  Specialized parasitoid attracted to a pheromone of ants , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  L. Gilbert,et al.  Ecological interactions of Pseudacteon parasitoids and Solenopsis ant hosts: environmental correlates of activity and effects on competitive hierarchies , 2000 .

[8]  T. Palmer SPATIAL HABITAT HETEROGENEITY INFLUENCES COMPETITION AND COEXISTENCE IN AN AFRICAN ACACIA ANT GUILD , 2003 .

[9]  J. R. King,et al.  Host Location Behavior in a Parasitoid of Imported Fire Ants , 2004, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[10]  D. Gordon,et al.  Optimization, Conflict, and Nonoverlapping Foraging Ranges in Ants , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[11]  D. Feener Is the assembly of ant communities mediated by parasitoids , 2000 .

[12]  S. Levin Community Equilibria and Stability, and an Extension of the Competitive Exclusion Principle , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[13]  D. Gordon,et al.  Exploitation and interference competition between the invasive Argentine ant, Linepithema humile, and native ant species , 1996, Oecologia.

[14]  K. Vepsäläinen,et al.  A competition hierarchy among boreal ants: impact on resource partitioning and community structure , 1988 .

[15]  Vlastimil Křivan,et al.  CONNECTING THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL STUDIES OF TRAIT‐MEDIATED INTERACTIONS , 2003 .

[16]  M. Orr,et al.  Ecological interactions among ants in the genus Linepithema, their phorid parasitoids, and ant competitors , 2003 .

[17]  R. Savolainen Colony success of the submissive ant Formica fusca within territories of the dominant Formica polyctena , 1990 .

[18]  S. Kirksey,et al.  The effects of food presentation and microhabitat upon resource monopoly in a ground-foraging ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) community. , 1969, Revista de biologia tropical.

[19]  Maureen L. Stanton,et al.  COMPETITION–COLONIZATION TRADE‐OFFS IN A GUILD OF AFRICAN ACACIA‐ANTS , 2002 .

[20]  Helene C. Muller-Landau,et al.  When do Localized Natural Enemies Increase Species Richness , 2005 .

[21]  C. Fonseca Amazonian ant–plant interactions and the nesting space limitation hypothesis , 1999, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[22]  R. Wehner,et al.  Sympatry and allopatry in two desert ant sister species: how do Cataglyphis bicolor and C. savignyi coexist? , 2003, Oecologia.

[23]  D. Gordon,et al.  The effects of interspecific interactions on resource use and behavior in a desert ant , 2000, Oecologia.

[24]  D. Davidson,et al.  Resource discovery versus resource domination in ants: a functional mechanism for breaking the trade‐off , 1998 .

[25]  J. Tiainen,et al.  Successional changes of ant assemblages: from virgin and ditched bogs to forests , 2000 .

[26]  S. Levin,et al.  Comparing Classical Community Models: Theoretical Consequences for Patterns of Diversity , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[27]  Frederick R. Adler,et al.  IS SPACE NECESSARY? INTERFERENCE COMPETITION AND LIMITS TO BIODIVERSITY , 2000 .

[28]  D. Gordon,et al.  Worker longevity in harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex) , 1987 .

[29]  K. Gaston,et al.  Constraint and Competition in Assemblages: A Cross‐Continental and Modeling Approach for Ants , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[30]  A. Andersen Sampling communities of ground‐foraging ants: Pitfall catches compared with quadrat counts in an Australian tropical savanna , 1991 .

[31]  D. Holway,et al.  COMPETITIVE MECHANISMS UNDERLYING THE DISPLACEMENT OF NATIVE ANTS BY THE INVASIVE ARGENTINE ANT , 1999 .

[32]  D. Gordon,et al.  RESOURCE‐DEPENDENT INTERACTIONS AND THE ORGANIZATION OF DESERT ANT COMMUNITIES , 2003 .

[33]  P. Price,et al.  Are galling insects better protected against parasitoids than exposed feeders?: a test using tenthredinid sawflies , 1988 .

[34]  D. Hochuli,et al.  REMOVAL EXPERIMENT REVEALS LIMITED EFFECTS OF A BEHAVIORALLY DOMINANT SPECIES ON ANT ASSEMBLAGES , 2004 .

[35]  I. Billick Worker demography in the ant Formica neorufibarbis , 2003 .

[36]  F. Adler The Balance of Terror: An Alternative Mechanism for Competitive Trade‐Offs and Its Implications for Invading Species , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[37]  A. Andersen,et al.  Seed selection by an exceptionally rich community of harvester ants in the Australian seasonal tropics , 2000 .

[38]  A. Andersen Functional groups and patterns of organization in North American ant communities: a comparison with Australia , 1997 .

[39]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  The Competition‐Colonization Trade‐off Is Dead; Long Live the Competition‐Colonization Trade‐off , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[40]  Edward G. LeBrun,et al.  Linked indirect effects in ant-phorid interactions: impacts on ant assemblage structure , 2002, Oecologia.

[41]  X. Cerdá,et al.  The role of competition by dominants and temperature in the foraging of subordinate species in Mediterranean ant communities , 1998, Oecologia.

[42]  J. H. Fellers,et al.  Interference and Exploitation in a Guild of Woodland Ants , 1987 .

[43]  R. Matthews,et al.  Ants. , 1898, Science.

[44]  D. Tilman Competition and Biodiversity in Spatially Structured Habitats , 1994 .

[45]  T. Palmer Wars of attrition: colony size determines competitive outcomes in a guild of African acacia ants , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[46]  D. Feener,et al.  Reduced foraging of Solenopsis geminata (Hymenoptera : Formicidae) in the presence of parasitic Pseudacteon spp. (Diptera : Phoridae) , 1992 .

[47]  X. Cerdá,et al.  Thermal disruption of transitive hierarchies in Mediterranean ant communities , 1997 .

[48]  Marcus Frean,et al.  Rock–scissors–paper and the survival of the weakest , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  G. Tullock,et al.  Competitive Exclusion. , 1960, Science.

[50]  J. Heinze,et al.  Nest site limitation and colony takeover in the ant Leptothorax nylanderi , 1998 .

[51]  B. Bestelmeyer The trade‐off between thermal tolerance and behavioural dominance in a subtropical South American ant community , 2000 .

[52]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  Homage to Santa Rosalia or Why Are There So Many Kinds of Animals? , 1959, The American Naturalist.

[53]  D. Feener Competition Between Ant Species: Outcome Controlled by Parasitic Flies , 1981, Science.

[54]  L. Morrison Indirect effects of phorid fly parasitoids on the mechanisms of interspecific competition among ants , 1999, Oecologia.

[55]  L. Morrison Mechanisms of interspecific competition among an invasive and two native fire ants , 2000 .