Simultaneous seismic and magnetic measurements in the Low-Noise Underground Laboratory (LSBB) of Rustrel, France, during the 2001 January 26 Indian earthquake

Since the decommission of the underground launching control room of the ground-based component of the French nuclear missile system, the whole installation has been turned into a cross-disciplinary underground laboratory.The LSBB is a unique low-noise underground laboratory because of its initial military conception and its location in the regional park of Luberon far from large cities, industry and heavy traffic. The deepest point is 500 m below the surface. At this depth a huge and non-conventional shielded cylindrical capsule is installed with no μ-metal, 1268 m 3 in volume, with a residual electromagnetic noise lower than 2 fT Hz - 1 / 2 above 10 Hz. As a result, fluctuations of the Earth's magnetic field under 10 Hz can be recorded at a very low-noise level with a low-T c SQUID 3-D magnetometer. Taking advantage of the main gallery topology, a broad-band underground seismic array has been deployed since 2001. An analysis of data recorded simultaneously by the seismic underground array and by the magnetometer sensors during the Indian earthquake of 2001 January 26 is presented. Evidence of a magnetic field perturbation induced by the seismic waves at teleseismic distance (6250 km) is supported by a polarization analysis of seismic and magnetic signals. Spectral analysis shows specific frequency bands of perturbation related to physical processes such as ground water flow acceleration within the mountain structure.

[1]  Y. Guglielmi,et al.  Quantitative Measurement of Channel‐Block Hydraulic Interactions by Experimental Saturation of a Large, Natural, Fissured Rock Mass , 2001, Ground Water.

[2]  Y. Fujinawa,et al.  Electromagnetic radiations associated with major earthquakes , 1998 .

[3]  J. Mudry,et al.  The karst system of the Fontaine de Vaucluse (Southeastern France) , 1992 .

[4]  Maria Macchiato,et al.  A new approach to investigate the correlation between geoelectrical time fluctuations and earthquakes in a seismic area of southern Italy , 2001 .

[5]  Masashi Hayakawa,et al.  Ultra-low-frequency magnetic fields during the Guam earthquake of 8 August 1993 and their interpretation , 1998 .

[6]  Nick Barton,et al.  Comparison of predicted and measured performance of a large cavern in the Himalayas , 1996 .

[7]  Panayiotis A. Varotsos,et al.  Physical properties of the variations of the electric field of the earth preceding earthquakes, I , 1984 .

[8]  Stéphane Garambois,et al.  Seismoelectric wave conversions in porous media: Field measurements and transfer function analysis , 2001 .

[9]  Jian Zhao,et al.  Effects of multiple parallel fractures on apparent attenuation of stress waves in rock masses , 2000 .

[10]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Computational Methods for Transient Analysis , 1985 .

[11]  Pride,et al.  Governing equations for the coupled electromagnetics and acoustics of porous media. , 1994, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[12]  Yu. A. Kopytenko,et al.  Results of ULF magnetic field measurements near the epicenters of the Spitak (Ms = 6.9) and Loma Prieta (Ms = 7.1) earthquakes: Comparative analysis , 1992 .

[13]  J. Vogt,et al.  Les tremblements de terre en France , 1979 .

[14]  D. Bloyet,et al.  First characterization of the ultra-shielded chamber in the low-noise underground laboratory (LSBB) of Rustrel-Pays d'Apt , 1999, astro-ph/9910192.

[15]  P. Varotsos,et al.  Physical properties of the variations of the electric field of the earth preceding earthquakes, I , 1984 .

[16]  M. S. Lazaridou,et al.  Latest aspects of earthquake prediction in Greece based on seismic electric signals, II☆ , 1993 .

[17]  B. H. Brady,et al.  Verification studies on the UDEC computational model of jointed rock , 1992 .

[18]  Stéphane Gaffet,et al.  A dense array experiment for the observation of waveform perturbations , 1998 .

[19]  Panayiotis A. Varotsos,et al.  Physical properties of the variations of the electric field of the earth preceding earthquakes. II. determination of epicenter and magnitude , 1984 .

[20]  T. Harper.  Response of fractured rock subject to fluid injection part I. Development of a numerical model , 1990 .

[21]  T. Van Duzer,et al.  Principles of Superconductive Devices and Circuits , 1981 .

[22]  Larry R. Myer,et al.  SEISMIC VISIBILITY OF FRACTURES , 1987 .

[23]  T. R. Harper,et al.  Response of fractured rock subject to fluid injection Part III. Practical application , 1990 .

[24]  J. Avouac,et al.  Electric potential variations associated with yearly lake level variations , 1998 .

[25]  Jian Zhao,et al.  A study of UDEC modelling for blast wave propagation in jointed rock masses , 1998 .

[26]  V. Pham,et al.  Mécanismes de génération de bruits telluriques dans la bande ultrabasse fréquence (UBF) : sources possibles des signaux dits «signaux électro-sismiques » (SES) , 2001 .

[27]  J. S. Y. Wang,et al.  Validity of cubic law for fluid flow in a deformable rock fracture. Technical information report No. 23 , 1979 .

[28]  Masashi Hayakawa,et al.  Precursory effects in the subionospheric VLF signals for the Kobe earthquake , 1998 .