Geographic concentration of innovative activities in Germany

The geographic concentration of industries has attracted much attention in recent economic and geographic literature. One mechanism employed to explain the emergence and comparative advantage of industrial agglomerations is based on the relationship between industrial agglomeration and local knowledge production and diffusion, and the resulting innovation activities. This paper analyses this relationship by identifying geographic concentrations of innovation activities and examining different causes for the emergence of these concentrations. The paper applies different concentration measures to patent data for German regions. We analyse 43 technological fields separately to identify which of these technologies tend to cluster in geographic space. The results are discussed in light of theoretical predictions of why specific technological fields concentrate while others do not. These explanations include the concentration of industrial activities, the role of dominant firms, dependence on scientific knowledge, and local interactions.

[1]  F. Malerba.  Sectoral systems of innovation and production , 2002 .

[2]  Raffaele Paci,et al.  Technological Enclaves and Industrial Districts: An Analysis of the Regional Distribution of Innovative Activity in Europe , 1997 .

[3]  Holger Ernst,et al.  Inventors are not alike: the distribution of patenting output among industrial R&D personnel , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[4]  Werner Smolny,et al.  Innovation, Wachstum und Beschäftigung / Innovations, Growth and Employment , 1999 .

[5]  A. Neely,et al.  Networking and Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Evidence , 2004 .

[6]  M. Amiti,et al.  Specialization patterns in Europe , 1999 .

[7]  Moshe Buchinsky.  Recent Advances in Quantile Regression Models: A Practical Guideline for Empirical Research , 1998 .

[8]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and recipient firm size , 1994 .

[9]  Francesco Pigliaru,et al.  Economic growth and change : national and regional patterns of convergence and divergence , 1999 .

[10]  Keith Smith,et al.  Measuring Innovation in European Industry , 1998 .

[11]  H. Grupp,et al.  Patent statistics in the age of globalisation: new legal procedures, new analytical methods, new economic interpretation , 1999 .

[12]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[13]  Marjolein C. J. Caniëls.  Regional growth differentials : the impact of locally bounded knowledge spillovers , 1999 .

[14]  Philip McCann,et al.  Human capital flows and regional knowledge assets: a simultaneous equation approach , 2006 .

[15]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  The Geographic Sources of Innovation: Technological Infrastructure and Product Innovation in the United States , 1994 .

[16]  Mahmut Yasar,et al.  Productivity and Exporting Status of Manufacturing Firms: Evidence from Quantile Regressions , 2003 .

[17]  Thomas Brenner,et al.  Local Industrial Clusters: Existence, Emergence and Evolution , 2004 .

[18]  Tom Broekel,et al.  The Regional Dimension of Knowledge Transfers—A Behavioral Approach , 2007 .

[19]  D. Audretsch.  Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity , 1998 .

[20]  T. Brenner.  A Stochastic Theory of Geographic Concentration and the Empirical Evidence in Germany , 2006 .

[21]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[22]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Regional clusters in Germany--their geography and their relevance for entrepreneurial activities , 2004 .

[23]  Attila Varga,et al.  Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations , 1997 .

[24]  Alex Coad,et al.  Innovation and firm growth in high-tech sectors: A quantile regression approach , 2008 .

[25]  Rainer Frietsch,et al.  Linking Technology Areas to Industrial Sectors , 2003 .

[26]  Gerhard Untiedt,et al.  Are there really high-tech clusters? The geographic concentration of German manufacturing industries and its determinants , 2006 .

[27]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  European 'regional clubs': do they exist, and where are they heading? On economic and technological differences between European regions , 1999 .

[28]  Hariolf Grupp,et al.  Interdependencies between the science and technology infrastructure and innovation activities in German regions: empirical findings and policy consequences , 1999 .

[29]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: Possibilities and problems , 2005, Scientometrics.

[30]  Pontus Braunerhjelm,et al.  Industry Clusters in Ohio and Sweden, 1975--1995 , 1999 .

[31]  P. Moran.  Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. , 1950, Biometrika.

[32]  D. Audretsch.  Innovation and Industry Evolution , 1995 .

[33]  Michel Zitt,et al.  TERRITORIAL CONCENTRATION AND EVOLUTION OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ACTIVITIES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION : A DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[34]  Edward L. Glaeser,et al.  Geographic Concentration in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach , 1997 .

[35]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  The Globalising Learning Economy: Implications for Innovation Policy , 1998 .

[36]  Rainer Frietsch,et al.  Linking Technology Areas to Industrial Sectors Final Report to the European Commission, DG Research , 2003 .

[37]  S. Davies,et al.  Choosing between Concentration Indices: The Iso-Concentration Curve , 1979 .

[38]  Maryann P. Feldman.  The geography of innovation , 1994 .

[39]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle , 1995 .

[40]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[41]  Giordano Mion,et al.  Concentration, Agglomeration and the Size of Plants , 2007 .

[42]  M. Amiti.  Specialisation patterns in Europe , 1997 .

[43]  A. Kleinknecht,et al.  Innovative output, and a firm's propensity to patent.: an exploration of CIS micro data , 1999 .

[44]  M. Wen.  Relocation and agglomeration of Chinese industry , 2004 .