Visions for small-scale renewable energy production on Finnish farms – A Delphi study on the opportunities for new business

Abstract The future of the energy system in many countries is characterised by a balance between centralised and distributed systems. Besides producing food, farms possess biomass and open space suitable for renewable energy (RE) production. This paper presents the agricultural, farm-level opportunities for fostering RE business in Finland. The timeframe for this scrutiny is until 2030, and the Delphi method is used to analyse the possibilities, barriers and solutions for growth. The results show that among national renewable energy and agricultural experts the most preferred energy sources for increasing RE business on farms were wood (including wood chips), biogas and solar photovoltaics (PV). When asked about the most likely development, wood and biogas remained, but solar PV was changed to ‘other farm-based biomass for burning’. The expert panel recognised the potential for RE business growth in agriculture, but easy access to the energy grid and refining incentives (both in the investment and production phases) for small-scale RE production were called for. Forerunners, pilots and new innovations were considered to foster the use of small-scale energy technologies. There was a clear hope that small-scale RE production on farms would not be based on heavy subsidies, but would grow as a market-based business.

[1]  Taija Sinkko,et al.  Distributed energy systems - DESY , 2015 .

[2]  Murray Turoff,et al.  The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications , 1976 .

[3]  Vilja Varho,et al.  Wind power in Finland up to the year 2025 , 2005 .

[4]  Sonja Brodt,et al.  Energy Intensity of Agriculture and Food Systems , 2011 .

[5]  Osmo Kuusi.  Expertise in the Future Use of Generic Technologies , 1999 .

[6]  F. Geels.  Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[7]  Saija Rasi,et al.  Saksan malli uusiutuvan energian ja hajautettujen järjestelmien edistäjänä : kirjallisuusselvitys kehityksen ajureista ja haasteista , 2014 .

[8]  M. Wackernagel,et al.  Urban ecological footprints: Why cities cannot be sustainable—And why they are a key to sustainability , 1996 .

[9]  J. Gareth Polhill,et al.  Exploring factors affecting on-farm renewable energy adoption in Scotland using large-scale microdata , 2017, Energy Policy.

[10]  Bertrand de Jouvenel,et al.  The Art of Conjecture. , 1968 .

[11]  T. Wakiyama,et al.  Assessment of renewable energy expansion potential and its implications on reforming Japan's electricity system , 2018 .

[12]  Derk Loorbach,et al.  Complexity and Transition Management , 2009 .

[13]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[14]  Vilja Varho,et al.  Futures of distributed small-scale renewable energy in Finland — A Delphi study of the opportunities and obstacles up to 2025 , 2016 .

[15]  Vilja Varho,et al.  Transition to distributed energy generation in Finland: Prospects and barriers , 2015 .

[16]  Ozcan Saritas,et al.  Future-Oriented Technology Analysis: Its Potential to Address Disruptive Transformations , 2011 .

[17]  John S. Dryzek,et al.  Deliberative Democracy in Divided Societies , 2005 .

[18]  J. Dryzek.  Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance , 2011 .

[19]  Petri Tapio,et al.  Disaggregative Policy Delphi: Using cluster analysis as a tool for systematic scenario formation , 2003 .

[20]  J. Byrne,et al.  Evaluating the potential of small-scale renewable energy options to meet rural livelihoods needs: A GIS- and lifecycle cost-based assessment of Western China's options , 2007 .

[21]  F. Geels.  The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms , 2011 .

[22]  Fahri Yetim,et al.  Structuring Communication Processes and Enhancing Public Discourse : The Delphi Method Revisited , 2004 .

[23]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Coal, nuclear and renewable energy policies in Germany: From the 1950s to the “Energiewende” , 2016 .

[24]  Martin Steinert,et al.  A dissensus based online Delphi approach: An explorative research tool , 2009 .

[25]  P. Rikkonen,et al.  Carrot or stick: Impacts of alternative climate and energy policy scenarios on agriculture , 2016 .

[26]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[27]  B. Stram.  Key challenges to expanding renewable energy , 2016 .

[28]  Patrick van der Duin,et al.  The Delphi method as early warning: Linking global societal trends to future radicalization and terrorism in The Netherlands , 2011 .

[29]  C. Cagnin,et al.  Positioning Future-Oriented Technology Analysis , 2008 .

[30]  U. Klann,et al.  RENEWABLE ENERGY POLICIES IN GERMANY: ANALYSIS OF ACTORS AND NEW BUSINESS MODELS AS A REACTION TO THE REDESIGN AND ADJUSTMENT OF POLICY INSTRUMENTS , 2012 .

[31]  P. Rikkonen.  Scenarios for future agriculture in Finland : a Delphi study among agri-food sector stakeholders , 2008 .

[32]  Heidi Rintamäki,et al.  Pump, boiler, cell or turbine? Six mixed scenarios of energy futures in farms , 2017 .

[33]  Dan Murray,et al.  Advancing the State of Policy Delphi Practice: A Systematic Review Evaluating Methodological Evolution, Innovation, and Opportunities , 2016 .

[34]  Pasi Rikkonen,et al.  Future prospects of alternative agro-based bioenergy use in Finland—Constructing scenarios with quantitative and qualitative Delphi data , 2009 .