Diversity, networks, and innovation: A text analytic approach to measuring expertise diversity

Abstract Despite the importance of diverse expertise in helping solve difficult interdisciplinary problems, measuring it is challenging and often relies on proxy measures and presumptive correlates of actual knowledge and experience. To address this challenge, we propose a text-based measure that uses researcher’s prior work to estimate their substantive expertise. These expertise estimates are then used to measure team-level expertise diversity by determining similarity or dissimilarity in members’ prior knowledge and skills. Using this measure on 2.8 million team invented patents granted by the US Patent Office, we show evidence of trends in expertise diversity over time and across team sizes, as well as its relationship with the quality and impact of a team’s innovation output.

[1]  Ryan Whalen,et al.  Patent Similarity Data and Innovation Metrics , 2020, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies.

[2]  Manuel E. Sosa,et al.  Revisiting the Role of Collaboration in Creating Breakthrough Inventions , 2019, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[3]  Ryan Whalen,et al.  A Network Theory of Patentability , 2019, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[4]  N. Contractor,et al.  Prior shared success predicts victory in team competitions , 2018, Nature Human Behaviour.

[5]  Ryan Whalen,et al.  Boundary spanning innovation and the patent system: Interdisciplinary challenges for a specialized examination system , 2018, Research Policy.

[6]  Stephen M Fiore,et al.  The Science of Team Science: A Review of the Empirical Evidence and Research Gaps on Collaboration in Science , 2018, The American psychologist.

[7]  Dorothy R. Carter,et al.  How Team Interlock Ecosystems Shape the Assembly of Scientific Teams: A Hypergraph Approach , 2018, Communication methods and measures.

[8]  Daniel M. Romero,et al.  The nearly universal link between the age of past knowledge and tomorrow’s breakthroughs in science and technology: The hotspot , 2017, Science Advances.

[9]  Erin Leahey,et al.  Prominent but Less Productive , 2015, ArXiv.

[10]  Jacob G. Foster,et al.  Weaving the fabric of science: Dynamic network models of science's unfolding structure , 2015, Soc. Networks.

[11]  Stasa Milojevic,et al.  Quantifying the cognitive extent of science , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[12]  Andrea Schiffauerova,et al.  How to Receive More Funding for Your Research? Get Connected to the Right People! , 2015, PloS one.

[13]  N. Contractor,et al.  The Effects of Diversity and Network Ties on Innovations , 2015, The American behavioral scientist.

[14]  J. Sieweke,et al.  The impact of team familiarity and team leader experience on team coordination errors: A panel analysis of professional basketball teams , 2015 .

[15]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Creativity in scientific teams: : Unpacking novelty and impact , 2015 .

[16]  Carlo Giupponi,et al.  Co-Authorship and Bibliographic Coupling Network Effects on Citations , 2014, PloS one.

[17]  Stasa Milojevic,et al.  Principles of scientific research team formation and evolution , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Marcello M. Mariani,et al.  Tackling the "Galácticos" effect: team familiarity and the performance of star-studded projects , 2013 .

[19]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact , 2013, Science.

[20]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Group Heterogeneity Increases the Risks of Large Group Size , 2013, Psychological science.

[21]  Hille C. Bruns,et al.  Working Alone Together: Coordination in Collaboration across Domains of Expertise , 2013 .

[22]  Robert S. Horton,et al.  A meta-analytic investigation of the processes underlying the similarity-attraction effect , 2013 .

[23]  Adam Worrall,et al.  Author Team Diversity and the Impact of Scientific Publications , 2012 .

[24]  Irene Pollach,et al.  Taming Textual Data: The Contribution of Corpus Linguistics to Computer-Aided Text Analysis , 2012 .

[25]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science: Analysis of article title words , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  Recombinant Search and Breakthrough Idea Generation: An Analysis of High Impact Papers in the Social Sciences , 2011 .

[27]  Anton J. Villado,et al.  Getting Specific about Demographic Diversity Variable and Team Performance Relationships: A Meta-Analysis , 2011 .

[28]  Katy Börner,et al.  A Multi-Level Systems Perspective for the Science of Team Science , 2010, Science Translational Medicine.

[29]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups , 2010 .

[30]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Lone Inventors as Source of Breakthroughs: Myth or Reality? , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[31]  Aparna Joshi,et al.  The Role Of Context In Work Team Diversity Research: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2009 .

[32]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Who collaborates successfully?: prior experience reduces collaboration barriers in distributed interdisciplinary research , 2008, CSCW.

[33]  Bradley R. Staats,et al.  Team familiarity, role experience, and performance: evidence from indian software services , 2008, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[34]  S. K. Horwitz,et al.  The Effects of Team Diversity on Team Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review of Team Demography , 2007 .

[35]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations , 2007 .

[36]  D. Harrison,et al.  What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. , 2007 .

[37]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Familiarity, Complexity, and Team Performance in Geographically Distributed Software Development , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[38]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[39]  Suzanne T Bell,et al.  Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[40]  H. Greve,et al.  Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge Combination and Experience in Innovative Teams , 2006 .

[41]  Dag W. Aksnes,et al.  Citation rates and perceptions of scientific contribution , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[42]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Collaborative Research Across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries , 2005 .

[43]  S. K. Horwitz The Compositional Impact of Team Diversity on Performance: Theoretical Considerations , 2005 .

[44]  J. Mathieu,et al.  CREATIVITY AND STANDARDIZATION: COMPLEMENTARY OR CONFLICTING DRIVERS OF TEAM EFFECTIVENESS? , 2005 .

[45]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance , 2005, Science.

[46]  Lu Hong,et al.  Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  Jonathon N. Cummings Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[48]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  How to Make the Team: Social Networks vs. Demography as Criteria for Designing Effective Teams , 2004 .

[49]  J. McGrath,et al.  TIME MATTERS IN TEAM PERFORMANCE: EFFECTS OF MEMBER FAMILIARITY, ENTRAINMENT, AND TASK DISCONTINUITY ON SPEED AND QUALITY , 2003 .

[50]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[51]  D. Harrison,et al.  Time, Teams, and Task Performance: Changing Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Group Functioning , 2002 .

[52]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[53]  S. Webber,et al.  Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis , 2001 .

[54]  L. Sproull,et al.  Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams , 2000 .

[55]  張富鈞,et al.  從人際吸引(interpersonal attraction)的觀點談體育課中師生的互動 , 2000 .

[56]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Choosing Work Group Members: Balancing Similarity, Competence, and Familiarity. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[57]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[58]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[59]  G. Littlepage,et al.  Effects of Task Experience and Group Experience on Group Performance, Member Ability, and Recognition of Expertise , 1997 .

[60]  G. Olson,et al.  From Laboratories to Collaboratories: A New Organizational Form for Scientific Collaboration , 1997 .

[61]  L. H. Pelled Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory , 1996 .

[62]  N. Anderson,et al.  Innovation in top management teams , 1996 .

[63]  T. Cox,et al.  Managing cultural diversity: implications for organizational competitiveness , 1991 .

[64]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[65]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  The Dynamics of Organizational Proximity , 1985 .

[66]  M. Mccorcle Critical Issues in the Functioning of Interdisciplinary Groups , 1982 .

[67]  Yun Huang,et al.  Understanding the assembly of interdisciplinary teams and its impact on performance , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[68]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[69]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: a meta-analysis. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[70]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search , 2001, Manag. Sci..