Decentralised facility-based training as an alternative model for SLMTA implementation: The Cameroon experience

Background The Strengthening Laboratory Management Toward Accreditation (SLMTA) programme is designed to build institutional capacity to help strengthen the tiered laboratory system. Most countries implement the SLMTA three-workshop series using a centralised model, whereby participants from several laboratories travel to one location to be trained together. Objectives We assessed the effectiveness and cost of conducting SLMTA training in a decentralised manner as compared to centralised training. Methods SLMTA was implemented in five pilot laboratories in Cameroon between October 2010 and October 2012 by means of a series of workshops, laboratory improvement projects and on-site mentorship. The first workshop was conducted in the traditional centralised approach. The second and third workshops were decentralised, delivered on-site at each of the five enrolled laboratories. Progress was monitored by repeated audits using the Stepwise Laboratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation (SLIPTA) checklist. Results Audit scores for all laboratories improved steadily through the course of the programme. Median improvement was 11 percentage points after the first (centralised) training and an additional 24 percentage points after the second (decentralised) training. The estimated per-laboratory cost of the two training models was approximately the same at US$21 000. However, in the decentralised model approximately five times as many staff members were trained, although it also required five times the amount of trainer time. Conclusion Decentralised SLMTA training was effective in improving laboratory quality and should be considered as an alternative to centralised training.

[1]  Katy Yao,et al.  Evidence from 617 laboratories in 47 countries for SLMTA-driven improvement in quality management systems , 2014, African journal of laboratory medicine.

[2]  J. Nkengasong A shifting paradigm in strengthening laboratory health systems for global health: acting now, acting collectively, but acting differently. , 2010, American journal of clinical pathology.

[3]  D. Birx,et al.  Laboratory Systems and Services Are Critical in Global Health , 2010, American journal of clinical pathology.

[4]  S. Moyo,et al.  Training-of-trainers: A strategy to build country capacity for SLMTA expansion and sustainability , 2014, African journal of laboratory medicine.

[5]  Katy Yao,et al.  The SLMTA programme: Transforming the laboratory landscape in developing countries , 2014, African journal of laboratory medicine.

[6]  E. Luman,et al.  A comprehensive review of the SLMTA literature part 1: Content analysis and future priorities , 2014, African journal of laboratory medicine.

[7]  Timothy Amukele,et al.  Medical laboratories in sub-Saharan Africa that meet international quality standards. , 2014, American journal of clinical pathology.

[8]  J. Nkengasong,et al.  Improving quality management systems of laboratories in developing countries: an innovative training approach to accelerate laboratory accreditation. , 2010, American journal of clinical pathology.

[9]  Jeffrey Wasserman,et al.  Strengthening laboratory systems in resource-limited settings. , 2010, American journal of clinical pathology.

[10]  Clement Zeh,et al.  The World Health Organization African region laboratory accreditation process: improving the quality of laboratory systems in the African region. , 2010, American journal of clinical pathology.

[11]  T. Maruta,et al.  Strengthening Laboratory Management Towards Accreditation: The Lesotho experience , 2011, African journal of laboratory medicine.

[12]  J. Justman,et al.  Developing Laboratory Systems and Infrastructure for HIV Scale-Up: A Tool for Health Systems Strengthening in Resource-Limited Settings , 2009, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.