Large Sized Left Inferior Phrenic Artery and Parahiatal Type of Diaphragmatic Hernia Generating Confusion During Robotic Surgical Repair.

INTRODUCTION As an advanced minimally invasive surgical procedure, the repair of the diaphragmatic hernia may sometimes be very challenging especially when the anatomy is unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS We are presenting a rare case of a parahiatal hernia defect repair where the understanding of the anatomy was complicated by the presence of an unusual large sized left inferior phrenic artery. The Da Vinci surgical platform was used to perform the entire procedure. Hernia sac dissection, identification of the crura, primary closure of the defect, and use of biologic mesh reinforcement were the main steps performed in the usual manner for hernia repair. In addition, the use of intraoperative ultrasound was of great utility to clarify the vascular anatomy. RESULTS The additional time required for the intraoperative ultrasound and identification of the vascular anatomy has increased the duration of the procedure that otherwise was uneventful. The accurate identification of the anatomy allowed for a safe surgical outcome. The postoperative course was favorable and patient was free of symptoms at 1-month follow-up. CONCLUSION The challenge of the repair of this rare, parahiatal type of diaphragmatic hernia where a large sized left inferior phrenic artery was also encountered was successfully mitigated by the use of the intraoperative Doppler ultrasound and by compliance with the basic steps of the procedure.

[1]  K. Şahinoğlu,et al.  Inferior Phrenic Arteries and Their Branches, Their Anatomy and Possible Clinical Importance: An Experimental Cadaver Study. , 2015, Balkan medical journal.

[2]  Franco Mosca,et al.  Robotic giant hiatal hernia repair: 3 year prospective evaluation and review of the literature , 2015, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[3]  H. Kenngott,et al.  Robotic-assisted paraesophageal hernia repair—a case–control study , 2013, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.

[4]  G. Antoniou,et al.  Lower Recurrence Rates After Mesh-reinforced Versus Simple Hiatal Hernia Repair: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials , 2012, Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques.

[5]  H. Ohtsuka,et al.  An unusual diaphragmatic hernia. Parahiatal hernia. . , 2012, Gastroenterology.

[6]  J. Luketich,et al.  Management of giant paraesophageal hernia. , 2009, Minerva chirurgica.

[7]  M. Rangarajan,et al.  Laparoscopic repair of parahiatal hernias with mesh: a retrospective study , 2008, Hernia.

[8]  K. Sung,et al.  Inferior phrenic artery: anatomy, variations, pathologic conditions, and interventional management. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[9]  Sung W. Shin,et al.  Diaphragmatic weakness after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization of inferior phrenic artery for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. , 2006, Radiology.

[10]  D. Fowler,et al.  "True" parahiatal hernia: a rare entity radiologic presentation and clinical management. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[11]  V. Velanovich,et al.  Surgical Management of Paraesophageal Hernias: Outcome and Quality of Life Analysis / with Invited Commentary , 2002, Digestive Surgery.

[12]  J. Hunter,et al.  Mesh complications after prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal closure: a 28-case series , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[13]  B. Choi,et al.  Hepatic tumors: predisposing factors for complications of transcatheter oily chemoembolization. , 1996, Radiology.