The Influence of Cochlear Mechanical Dysfunction, Temporal Processing Deficits, and Age on the Intelligibility of Audible Speech in Noise for Hearing-Impaired Listeners
暂无分享,去创建一个
Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda | Sridhar Kalluri | E. Lopez-Poveda | P. T. Johannesen | P. Pérez-González | J. L. Blanco | S. Kalluri | Patricia Pérez-González | Peter T. Johannesen | José L. Blanco
[1] Brian C J Moore,et al. The importance of temporal fine structure information in speech at different spectral regions for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda,et al. Behavioral Estimates of the Contribution of Inner and Outer Hair Cell Dysfunction to Individualized Audiometric Loss , 2012, Front. Neurosci..
[3] T. Ricketts,et al. Directional benefit in the presence of speech and speechlike maskers. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[4] D D Dirks,et al. Subjective judgements of clarity and intelligibility for filtered stimuli with equivalent speech intelligibility index predictions. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[5] S. Soli,et al. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] John Fletcher,et al. Speech Understanding and Aging , 1977 .
[7] J M Festen,et al. Relations between auditory functions in impaired hearing. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] B C Moore,et al. Inter-relationship between different psychoacoustic measures assumed to be related to the cochlear active mechanism. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] A. Palmer,et al. Phase-locking in the cochlear nerve of the guinea-pig and its relation to the receptor potential of inner hair-cells , 1986, Hearing Research.
[10] D. H. Johnson,et al. The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11] C. D. Geisler,et al. Responses of auditory-nerve fibers to multiple-tone complexes. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12] Vit Drga,et al. Inferred basilar-membrane response functions for listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] Sharon G. Kujawa,et al. Age-Related Primary Cochlear Neuronal Degeneration in Human Temporal Bones , 2011, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.
[14] B. Moore,et al. Age-group differences in speech identification despite matched audiometrically normal hearing: contributions from auditory temporal processing and cognition , 2015, Front. Aging Neurosci..
[15] Larry E Humes,et al. Factors underlying the speech-recognition performance of elderly hearing-aid wearers. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] Speech understanding and aging. Working Group on Speech Understanding and Aging. Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] S. Gordon-Salant. The aging auditory system , 2010 .
[18] Alicia Huarte,et al. The Castilian Spanish Hearing in Noise Test , 2008, International journal of audiology.
[19] M. Charles Liberman,et al. Towards a Diagnosis of Cochlear Neuropathy with Envelope Following Responses , 2015, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.
[20] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. I. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] L. Robles,et al. Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. , 2001, Physiological reviews.
[22] M. Liberman,et al. Adding Insult to Injury: Cochlear Nerve Degeneration after “Temporary” Noise-Induced Hearing Loss , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[23] Andrew J Oxenham,et al. Behavioral measures of cochlear compression and temporal resolution as predictors of speech masking release in hearing-impaired listeners. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[24] Eric D Young,et al. Neural representation of spectral and temporal information in speech , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[25] Sridhar Kalluri,et al. Predicting the effect of hearing loss and audibility on amplified speech reception in a multi-talker listening scenario. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[26] Brian C J Moore,et al. The effects of age and cochlear hearing loss on temporal fine structure sensitivity, frequency selectivity, and speech reception in noise. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[27] H. Levitt. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[28] Joseph W. Hall,et al. Temporal Processing Deficits in Middle Age. , 2015, American journal of audiology.
[29] Ewen MacDonald,et al. Temporal jitter disrupts speech intelligibility: A simulation of auditory aging , 2007, Hearing Research.
[30] R. Plomp,et al. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. II. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] Christopher A Shera,et al. Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[33] B C Moore,et al. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[34] J. Oghalai,et al. Chapter 37 – Cochlear Hearing Loss , 2005 .
[35] Ray Meddis,et al. A computer model of auditory efferent suppression: implications for the recognition of speech in noise. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[36] Brian C J Moore,et al. The contribution of temporal fine structure to the intelligibility of speech in steady and modulated noise. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[37] Judy R Dubno,et al. Frequency modulation detection: effects of age, psychophysical method, and modulation waveform. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[38] Christopher J. Plack,et al. Perceptual Consequences of “Hidden” Hearing Loss , 2014, Trends in hearing.
[39] H. Dillon,et al. An international comparison of long‐term average speech spectra , 1994 .
[40] SungHee Kim,et al. Effects of age on speech understanding in normal hearing listeners: Relationship between the auditory efferent system and speech intelligibility in noise , 2006, Speech Commun..
[41] Brian C. J. Moore,et al. The effects of age on temporal fine structure sensitivity in monaural and binaural conditions , 2012, International journal of audiology.
[42] E. Lopez-Poveda,et al. Estimation of the degree of inner and outer hair cell dysfunction from distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions , 2009 .
[43] C V Pavlovic,et al. An evaluation of some assumptions underlying the articulation index. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[44] Mario A. Ruggero,et al. The effects of acoustic trauma, other cochlear injury and death on basilar-membrane responses to sound , 1996 .
[45] N. J. Versfeld,et al. The dynamic range of speech, compression, and its effect on the speech reception threshold in stationary and interrupted noise. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[46] A. Goldberger,et al. On Pure and Mixed Statistical Estimation in Economics , 1961 .
[47] Van Summers,et al. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners. , 2013, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[48] B C Moore,et al. Detection of frequency modulation at low modulation rates: evidence for a mechanism based on phase locking. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[49] Kenneth S Henry,et al. Diminished temporal coding with sensorineural hearing loss emerges in background noise , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.
[50] John J Guinan,et al. Cochlear efferent innervation and function , 2010, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.
[51] H. Dillon,et al. The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid , 1986, Ear and hearing.
[52] Ray Meddis,et al. Cochlear nonlinearity between 500 and 8000 Hz in listeners with normal hearing. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[53] Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda,et al. Perception of stochastically undersampled sound waveforms: a model of auditory deafferentation , 2013, Front. Neurosci..
[54] B C Moore,et al. Further evaluation of a model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[55] G A Studebaker,et al. Evaluating relative speech recognition performance using the proficiency factor and rationalized arcsine differences. , 1995, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[56] Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda,et al. Why do I hear but not understand? Stochastic undersampling as a model of degraded neural encoding of speech , 2014, Front. Neurosci..
[57] B C Moore,et al. Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in the presence of interfering speech. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[58] H. Fletcher,et al. The Perception of Speech and Its Relation to Telephony , 1950 .
[59] E. Lopez-Poveda,et al. A variant temporal-masking-curve method for inferring peripheral auditory compression. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[60] S. Scollie. Children’s Speech Recognition Scores: The Speech Intelligibility Index and Proficiency Factors for Age and Hearing Level , 2008, Ear and Hearing.
[61] K. S. Rhebergen,et al. Extended speech intelligibility index for the prediction of the speech reception threshold in fluctuating noise. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[62] E. Lopez-Poveda,et al. Forward-Masking Recovery and the Assumptions of the Temporal Masking Curve Method of Inferring Cochlear Compression , 2015, Trends in hearing.
[63] T. Houtgast,et al. Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[64] Torsten Dau,et al. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[65] Brian C J Moore,et al. Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[66] I M Noordhoek,et al. Relations between intelligibility of narrow-band speech and auditory functions, both in the 1-kHz frequency region. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[67] Sara K. Mamo,et al. Frequency modulation detection as a measure of temporal processing: Age-related monaural and binaural effects , 2012, Hearing Research.