The Influence of Cochlear Mechanical Dysfunction, Temporal Processing Deficits, and Age on the Intelligibility of Audible Speech in Noise for Hearing-Impaired Listeners

The aim of this study was to assess the relative importance of cochlear mechanical dysfunction, temporal processing deficits, and age on the ability of hearing-impaired listeners to understand speech in noisy backgrounds. Sixty-eight listeners took part in the study. They were provided with linear, frequency-specific amplification to compensate for their audiometric losses, and intelligibility was assessed for speech-shaped noise (SSN) and a time-reversed two-talker masker (R2TM). Behavioral estimates of cochlear gain loss and residual compression were available from a previous study and were used as indicators of cochlear mechanical dysfunction. Temporal processing abilities were assessed using frequency modulation detection thresholds. Age, audiometric thresholds, and the difference between audiometric threshold and cochlear gain loss were also included in the analyses. Stepwise multiple linear regression models were used to assess the relative importance of the various factors for intelligibility. Results showed that (a) cochlear gain loss was unrelated to intelligibility, (b) residual cochlear compression was related to intelligibility in SSN but not in a R2TM, (c) temporal processing was strongly related to intelligibility in a R2TM and much less so in SSN, and (d) age per se impaired intelligibility. In summary, all factors affected intelligibility, but their relative importance varied across maskers.

[1]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  The importance of temporal fine structure information in speech at different spectral regions for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda,et al.  Behavioral Estimates of the Contribution of Inner and Outer Hair Cell Dysfunction to Individualized Audiometric Loss , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[3]  T. Ricketts,et al.  Directional benefit in the presence of speech and speechlike maskers. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[4]  D D Dirks,et al.  Subjective judgements of clarity and intelligibility for filtered stimuli with equivalent speech intelligibility index predictions. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[5]  S. Soli,et al.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  John Fletcher,et al.  Speech Understanding and Aging , 1977 .

[7]  J M Festen,et al.  Relations between auditory functions in impaired hearing. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  B C Moore,et al.  Inter-relationship between different psychoacoustic measures assumed to be related to the cochlear active mechanism. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  A. Palmer,et al.  Phase-locking in the cochlear nerve of the guinea-pig and its relation to the receptor potential of inner hair-cells , 1986, Hearing Research.

[10]  D. H. Johnson,et al.  The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  C. D. Geisler,et al.  Responses of auditory-nerve fibers to multiple-tone complexes. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Vit Drga,et al.  Inferred basilar-membrane response functions for listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Sharon G. Kujawa,et al.  Age-Related Primary Cochlear Neuronal Degeneration in Human Temporal Bones , 2011, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[14]  B. Moore,et al.  Age-group differences in speech identification despite matched audiometrically normal hearing: contributions from auditory temporal processing and cognition , 2015, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[15]  Larry E Humes,et al.  Factors underlying the speech-recognition performance of elderly hearing-aid wearers. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Speech understanding and aging. Working Group on Speech Understanding and Aging. Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  S. Gordon-Salant The aging auditory system , 2010 .

[18]  Alicia Huarte,et al.  The Castilian Spanish Hearing in Noise Test , 2008, International journal of audiology.

[19]  M. Charles Liberman,et al.  Towards a Diagnosis of Cochlear Neuropathy with Envelope Following Responses , 2015, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[20]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. I. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  L. Robles,et al.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. , 2001, Physiological reviews.

[22]  M. Liberman,et al.  Adding Insult to Injury: Cochlear Nerve Degeneration after “Temporary” Noise-Induced Hearing Loss , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Andrew J Oxenham,et al.  Behavioral measures of cochlear compression and temporal resolution as predictors of speech masking release in hearing-impaired listeners. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Eric D Young,et al.  Neural representation of spectral and temporal information in speech , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  Sridhar Kalluri,et al.  Predicting the effect of hearing loss and audibility on amplified speech reception in a multi-talker listening scenario. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  The effects of age and cochlear hearing loss on temporal fine structure sensitivity, frequency selectivity, and speech reception in noise. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Joseph W. Hall,et al.  Temporal Processing Deficits in Middle Age. , 2015, American journal of audiology.

[29]  Ewen MacDonald,et al.  Temporal jitter disrupts speech intelligibility: A simulation of auditory aging , 2007, Hearing Research.

[30]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. II. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Christopher A Shera,et al.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  B C Moore,et al.  Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  J. Oghalai,et al.  Chapter 37 – Cochlear Hearing Loss , 2005 .

[35]  Ray Meddis,et al.  A computer model of auditory efferent suppression: implications for the recognition of speech in noise. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  The contribution of temporal fine structure to the intelligibility of speech in steady and modulated noise. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Judy R Dubno,et al.  Frequency modulation detection: effects of age, psychophysical method, and modulation waveform. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  Christopher J. Plack,et al.  Perceptual Consequences of “Hidden” Hearing Loss , 2014, Trends in hearing.

[39]  H. Dillon,et al.  An international comparison of long‐term average speech spectra , 1994 .

[40]  SungHee Kim,et al.  Effects of age on speech understanding in normal hearing listeners: Relationship between the auditory efferent system and speech intelligibility in noise , 2006, Speech Commun..

[41]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  The effects of age on temporal fine structure sensitivity in monaural and binaural conditions , 2012, International journal of audiology.

[42]  E. Lopez-Poveda,et al.  Estimation of the degree of inner and outer hair cell dysfunction from distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions , 2009 .

[43]  C V Pavlovic,et al.  An evaluation of some assumptions underlying the articulation index. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  Mario A. Ruggero,et al.  The effects of acoustic trauma, other cochlear injury and death on basilar-membrane responses to sound , 1996 .

[45]  N. J. Versfeld,et al.  The dynamic range of speech, compression, and its effect on the speech reception threshold in stationary and interrupted noise. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  A. Goldberger,et al.  On Pure and Mixed Statistical Estimation in Economics , 1961 .

[47]  Van Summers,et al.  Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners. , 2013, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[48]  B C Moore,et al.  Detection of frequency modulation at low modulation rates: evidence for a mechanism based on phase locking. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  Kenneth S Henry,et al.  Diminished temporal coding with sensorineural hearing loss emerges in background noise , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  John J Guinan,et al.  Cochlear efferent innervation and function , 2010, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[51]  H. Dillon,et al.  The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid , 1986, Ear and hearing.

[52]  Ray Meddis,et al.  Cochlear nonlinearity between 500 and 8000 Hz in listeners with normal hearing. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[53]  Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda,et al.  Perception of stochastically undersampled sound waveforms: a model of auditory deafferentation , 2013, Front. Neurosci..

[54]  B C Moore,et al.  Further evaluation of a model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  G A Studebaker,et al.  Evaluating relative speech recognition performance using the proficiency factor and rationalized arcsine differences. , 1995, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[56]  Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda,et al.  Why do I hear but not understand? Stochastic undersampling as a model of degraded neural encoding of speech , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[57]  B C Moore,et al.  Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in the presence of interfering speech. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[58]  H. Fletcher,et al.  The Perception of Speech and Its Relation to Telephony , 1950 .

[59]  E. Lopez-Poveda,et al.  A variant temporal-masking-curve method for inferring peripheral auditory compression. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[60]  S. Scollie Children’s Speech Recognition Scores: The Speech Intelligibility Index and Proficiency Factors for Age and Hearing Level , 2008, Ear and hearing.

[61]  N. J. Versfeld,et al.  Extended speech intelligibility index for the prediction of the speech reception threshold in fluctuating noise. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[62]  E. Lopez-Poveda,et al.  Forward-Masking Recovery and the Assumptions of the Temporal Masking Curve Method of Inferring Cochlear Compression , 2015, Trends in hearing.

[63]  T. Houtgast,et al.  Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[64]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[65]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[66]  I M Noordhoek,et al.  Relations between intelligibility of narrow-band speech and auditory functions, both in the 1-kHz frequency region. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[67]  Sara K. Mamo,et al.  Frequency modulation detection as a measure of temporal processing: Age-related monaural and binaural effects , 2012, Hearing Research.