Evaluating the roles of the inferior frontal gyrus and superior parietal lobule in deductive reasoning: An rTMS study

This study used off-line repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to examine the roles of the superior parietal lobule (SPL) and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) in a deductive reasoning task. Subjects performed a categorical syllogistic reasoning task involving congruent, incongruent, and abstract trials. Twenty four subjects received magnetic stimulation to the SPL region prior to the task. In the other 24 subjects, TMS was administered to the IFG region before the task. Stimulation lasted for 10min, with an inter-pulse frequency of 1Hz. We found that bilateral SPL (Brodmann area (BA) 7) stimulation disrupted performance on abstract and incongruent reasoning. Left IFG (BA 45) stimulation impaired congruent reasoning performance while paradoxically facilitating incongruent reasoning performance. This resulted in the elimination of the belief-bias. In contrast, right IFG stimulation only impaired incongruent reasoning performance, thus enhancing the belief-bias effect. These findings are largely consistent with the dual-process theory of reasoning, which proposes the existence of two different human reasoning systems: a belief-based heuristic system; and a logic-based analytic system. The present findings suggest that the left language-related IFG (BA 45) may correspond to the heuristic system, while bilateral SPL may underlie the analytic system. The right IFG may play a role in blocking the belief-based heuristic system for solving incongruent reasoning trials. This study could offer an insight about functional roles of distributed brain systems in human deductive reasoning by utilizing the rTMS approach.

[1]  Wim De Neys,et al.  Automatic-heuristic and executive-analytic processing during reasoning: Chronometric and dual-task considerations. , 2006 .

[2]  T. Robbins,et al.  A componential analysis of task-switching deficits associated with lesions of left and right frontal cortex. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  D. Osherson,et al.  The boundaries of language and thought in deductive inference , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Mitsuhiro Okada,et al.  Effects of aging on hemispheric asymmetry in inferior frontal cortex activity during belief–bias syllogistic reasoning: A near-infrared spectroscopy study , 2010, Behavioural Brain Research.

[5]  Giulio Tononi,et al.  Evaluating the role of prefrontal and parietal cortices in memory-guided response with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  Mark W Greenlee,et al.  Spatial imagery in deductive reasoning: a functional MRI study. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[7]  Jonathan Evans.  In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  The role of area 17 in visual imagery: convergent evidence from PET and rTMS. , 1999, Science.

[9]  R. Dolan,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of three-term relational reasoning , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Richard S. Frackowiak,et al.  Neural basis of generation of conclusions in elementary deduction , 2007, NeuroImage.

[11]  Wim De Neys,et al.  Belief inhibition during thinking: Not always winning but at least taking part , 2009, Cognition.

[12]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Shigeru Watanabe,et al.  Neural correlates of belief-bias reasoning under time pressure: A near-infrared spectroscopy study , 2010, NeuroImage.

[14]  V. Goel,et al.  Smarter Than We Think , 2008, Psychological science.

[15]  Daniel N. Osherson,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of deductive inference: A language-independent distributed network , 2007, NeuroImage.

[16]  Shigeru Watanabe,et al.  Effects of sedative and nonsedative antihistamines on prefrontal activity during verbal fluency task in young children: a near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) study , 2009, Psychopharmacology.

[17]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Neural Substrates for Reversing Stimulus–Outcome and Stimulus–Response Associations , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  P. Johnson-Laird.  Mental models and probabilistic thinking , 1994, Cognition.

[20]  Matthias L. Schroeter,et al.  Prefrontal brain activation during stop-signal response inhibition: An event-related functional near-infrared spectroscopy study , 2007, Behavioural Brain Research.

[21]  Philip N Johnson-Laird,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:Mental models and human reasoning , 2010 .

[22]  Markus Knauff,et al.  Mental imagery, reasoning, and blindness , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[24]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Reasoning, Models, and Images: Behavioral Measures and Cortical Activity , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  R. Dolan,et al.  Dissociation of Mechanisms Underlying Syllogistic Reasoning , 2000, NeuroImage.

[26]  Vinod Goel,et al.  Explaining modulation of reasoning by belief , 2003, Cognition.

[27]  Koji Jimura,et al.  Activation of Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus during Response Inhibition across Response Modalities , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  Vinod Goel,et al.  Intuitive interference in quantitative reasoning , 2006, Brain Research.

[29]  Jonathan Evans.  Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[30]  Shigeru Watanabe,et al.  Neural correlates of dual-task effect on belief-bias syllogistic reasoning: A near-infrared spectroscopy study , 2009, Brain Research.

[31]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Beyond Significance Testing: Reforming Data Analysis Methods in Behavioral Research , 2004 .

[32]  Preston P. Thakral,et al.  The role of parietal cortex during sustained visual spatial attention , 2009, Brain Research.

[33]  Y. Tabei,et al.  Damage to the right superior longitudinal fasciculus in the inferior parietal lobe plays a role in spatial neglect , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  Elliot T. Berkman,et al.  Inhibitory spillover: Intentional motor inhibition produces incidental limbic inhibition via right inferior frontal cortex , 2009, NeuroImage.

[35]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Prefrontal and parietal contributions to refreshing: An rTMS study , 2008, NeuroImage.

[36]  P. Johnson-Laird.  Mental models and deduction , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  Albert Postma,et al.  Categorical and coordinate spatial relations in working memory: An fMRI study , 2009, Brain Research.

[38]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Visual imagery can impede reasoning , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[39]  Shigeru Watanabe,et al.  The role of inferior frontal cortex in belief-bias reasoning: An rTMS study , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  Jian Huang,et al.  Involvement of left inferior frontal gyrus in sentence-level semantic integration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[41]  Brian Everitt,et al.  A systematic review and quantitative appraisal of fMRI studies of verbal fluency: Role of the left inferior frontal gyrus , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[42]  R. Goebel,et al.  The experimental combination of rTMS and fMRI reveals the functional relevance of parietal cortex for visuospatial functions. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[43]  Jun Saiki,et al.  Neural basis for dynamic updating of object representation in visual working memory , 2010, NeuroImage.

[44]  Wim De Neys,et al.  Dual Processing in Reasoning , 2006, Psychological science.

[45]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Cortical and Subcortical Contributions to Stop Signal Response Inhibition: Role of the Subthalamic Nucleus , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  M. Joanisse,et al.  Modulation of brain regions involved in word recognition by homophonous stimuli: An fMRI study , 2011, Brain Research.

[47]  Allen Newell,et al.  Deduction as verbal reasoning. , 1995 .

[48]  Vinod Goel,et al.  A role for right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex in reasoning about indeterminate relations , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[49]  A. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Studies in Cognition: The Problems Solved and Created by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  P. Matthews,et al.  Semantic Processing in the Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex: A Combined Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[51]  E. Wassermann.  Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[52]  Susanne Ferber,et al.  Lost in space—The fate of memory representations for non-neglected stimuli , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  Jérôme Prado,et al.  Recomposing a fragmented literature: How conditional and relational arguments engage different neural systems for deductive reasoning , 2010, NeuroImage.

[54]  Vinod Goel,et al.  Anatomy of deductive reasoning , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[55]  G. Tononi,et al.  Evaluating frontal and parietal contributions to spatial working memory with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2008, Brain Research.

[56]  Emiliano Macaluso,et al.  Conditional and syllogistic deductive tasks dissociate functionally during premise integration , 2010, Human brain mapping.

[57]  Todd B. Parrish,et al.  Neural plasticity and treatment-induced recovery of sentence processing in agrammatism , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[58]  Andy Field,et al.  Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[59]  Marta Kutas,et al.  fMRI responses to words repeated in a congruous semantic context are abnormal in mild Alzheimer's disease , 2010, Neuropsychologia.