Task-oriented quantitative image reconstruction in emission tomography for single- and multi-subject studies

Task-based selection of image reconstruction methodology in emission tomography is a critically important step when designing a PET study. This paper concerns optimizing, given the measured data of the study only, reconstruction performance for a range of quantification tasks: finding the mean radioactivity concentration for different regions of interests (ROIs), different ROI sizes and different group sizes (i.e. the number of subjects in the PET study). At present, the variability of quantification performance of different reconstruction methods, according to both the ROI and group sizes, is largely ignored. In this paper, it is shown that both the ROI and group size have a tremendous impact on the error of the estimator for the task of ROI quantification. A study-specific, task-oriented and space-variant selection rule is proposed that selects a close to optimal estimate drawn from a series of estimates obtained by filtered backprojection (FBP) and different OSEM (ordered subset expectation maximization) iterations. The optimality criterion is to minimize an estimated mean square error (MSE), where the MSE is estimated from the data in the study using the bootstrap resampling technique. The proposed approach is appropriate for both pixel-level estimates and ROI estimates in single- and multi-subject studies. An extensive multi-trial simulation study using a 2D numerical phantom and relevant count levels shows that the proposed selection rule can produce quantitative estimates that are close to the estimates that minimize the true MSE (where the true MSE can only be obtained from many independent Monte-Carlo realizations with knowledge of the ground truth). This indicates that with the proposed selection rule one can obtain a close to optimal estimate while avoiding the critical step of selecting user-defined reconstruction settings (such as an OSEM iteration number or the choice between FBP and OSEM). In this initial 2D study, only FBP and OSEM reconstruction methods are considered but the proposed selection rule should readily generalize to different estimators (i.e. different reconstruction algorithms) and 3D imaging.

[1]  Dean F. Wong,et al.  Accurate Event-Driven Motion Compensation in High-Resolution PET Incorporating Scattered and Random Events , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  J Llacer,et al.  Feasible images and practical stopping rules for iterative algorithms in emission tomography. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[3]  Jinyi Qi Noise propagation in iterative reconstruction algorithms with line searches , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[4]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  Comparison of 3D-OP-OSEM and 3D-FBP reconstruction algorithms for High-Resolution Research Tomograph studies: effects of randoms estimation methods , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Brian F. Hutton,et al.  The impact of reconstruction method on the quantification of DaTSCAN images , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[6]  Jeffrey A. Fessler Mean and variance of implicitly defined biased estimators (such as penalized maximum likelihood): applications to tomography , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[7]  Andrew J. Reader,et al.  EM algorithm system modeling by image-space techniques for PET reconstruction , 2003 .

[8]  Ronald H. Huesman,et al.  Theoretical study of penalized-likelihood image reconstruction for region of interest quantification , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Carole Lartizien,et al.  Comparison of Bootstrap Resampling Methods for 3-D PET Imaging , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Donald W. Wilson,et al.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm. I. Theory , 1994 .

[11]  J. Qi Noise propagation in iterative reconstruction algorithms with line searches , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[12]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Spatial resolution properties of penalized-likelihood image reconstruction: space-invariant tomographs , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[13]  Anthonin Reilhac,et al.  Simulation-based evaluation of OSEM iterative reconstruction methods in dynamic brain PET studies , 2008, NeuroImage.

[14]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Resolution and noise properties of MAP reconstruction for fully 3-D PET , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Irène Buvat,et al.  A non-parametric bootstrap approach for analysing the statistical properties of SPECT and PET images. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Dan J. Kadrmas Statistically regulated and adaptive EM reconstruction for emission computed tomography , 2000 .

[17]  D R Haynor,et al.  Resampling estimates of precision in emission tomography. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[18]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[19]  J. Fessler,et al.  Spatial resolution properties of penalized-likelihood image reconstruction: space-invariant tomographs , 1996, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[20]  T. Hebert,et al.  Fast methods for including attenuation in the EM algorithm , 1990 .