The Emic Strategy in the Identification and Assessment of Personality Dimensions in a Non-Western Culture

The rationale for, and steps for executing, an emic (culture-specific) strategy in the identification and assessment of personality dimensions in non-Western cultures is discussed. We argue that the emic strategy has been underused, and that it best precedes attempts to demonstrate cross-cultural(etic) links or generalities. Four steps in the emic strategy are described: (1) identification of emic concepts, (2) generation of culture-relevant items to assess emic concepts,(3) emic validation of emic dimensions, and (4) relating emic and imposed-etic dimensions in a search for etic or universal dimensions. In a Philippine illustration of these steps, emic personality dimensions (scales) tapping Filipino college students' emic concepts of healthy personality showed variable links to existing U.S. personality dimensions, which in turn showed only fair generalizability to the Philippine setting.

[1]  R. Cattell,et al.  A CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON OF SECOND-STRATUM QUESTIONNAIRE PERSONALITY FACTOR STRUCTURES--ANXIETY AND EXTRAVERSION--IN AMERICA AND JAPAN. , 1965, The Journal of social psychology.

[2]  Virgilio G. Enriquez.  Towards cross-cultural knowledge through cross-indigenous methods and perspectives. , 1979 .

[3]  P. A. Marks,et al.  MMPI and race: A controlled study. , 1982 .

[4]  Harry C. Triandis,et al.  Simpatia as a Cultural Script of Hispanics. , 1984 .

[5]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  J. Levin,et al.  Demonstration of Cross-Cultural Invariance of the California Psychological Inventory in America and Israel by the Guttman-Lingoes Smallest Space Analysis , 1970 .

[7]  C. Spielberger,et al.  Advances in personality assessment , 1982 .

[8]  M. Bond,et al.  Ethnic Affirmation Versus Cross-Cultural Accommodation , 1982 .

[9]  P. Britton,et al.  CHAPTER 10 – The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory , 1966 .

[10]  J. Berry,et al.  Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research , 1986 .

[11]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  M. S. Katigbak,et al.  The Effects of Language of Data Collection on Derived Conceptions of healthy Personality with Filipino Bilinguals , 1988 .

[13]  A. T. Church,et al.  Personality research in a non-Western culture: The Philippines. , 1987 .

[14]  Kazimierz M. Slomczynski,et al.  Assessing Comparability of Measurement in Cross-National Research: Authoritarian-Conservatism in Different Sociocultural Settings , 1981 .

[15]  R. Cattell.  Personality and motivation structure and measurement , 1958 .

[16]  H. Triandis,et al.  Multistrategy Approach to Cross-Cultural Research , 1983 .

[17]  J. Graham,et al.  Behavioral correlates for the MMPI standard F scale and for a modified F scale for black and white psychiatric patients. , 1981, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[18]  J. Berry,et al.  Human Assessment and Cultural Factors , 1983 .

[19]  Virgilio G. Enriquez,et al.  Neo-colonial politics and language struggle in the Philippines : national consciousness and language in Philippine psychology, 1971-1983 , 1984 .

[20]  Donald W. Fiske,et al.  Measuring the concepts of personality , 1971 .

[21]  P. McReynolds,et al.  Advances in Psychological Assessment , 1968 .

[22]  D. Jackson,et al.  PERSONALITY MEASUREMENT: DO THE SCALES HAVE SIMILAR MEANINGS IN ANOTHER CULTURE? , 1983 .

[23]  M. S. Katigbak,et al.  Conceptions of good psychological health and personality functioning of Filipino college students: A multi-method investigation. , 1985 .

[24]  H. Triandis.  The analysis of subjective culture , 1973 .

[25]  W. T. Norman,et al.  A universal conception of personality structure? , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  R. Brislin.  Cross-cultural research methods , 1973 .

[27]  F. Lynch,et al.  Four readings on Philippine values , 1964 .

[28]  J. Berry.  Towards a Universal Psychology of Cognitive Competence , 1984 .

[29]  W. Lonner,et al.  Stalking the Wily Emic: Alternatives to Cross-Cultural Measurement , 1983 .

[30]  A. Tellegen.  Brief manual for the Differential Personality Questionnaire , 1982 .

[31]  P. M. Spinks.  A Preliminary Culture-Specific Personality Scale , 1983 .

[32]  H. Miller,et al.  Validation of Gilberstadt and Duker's 8–6 Profile Type on a Black Sample , 1971, Psychological reports.

[33]  G. Burger,et al.  Differential effects of ethnic membership, sex, and occupation on the California Psychological Inventory. , 1978, Journal of personality assessment.

[34]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. , 1977 .

[35]  I. Maznah,et al.  THE FACTOR STRUCTURE OF THE BEM SEX‐ROLE INVENTORY (BSRI) , 1986 .

[36]  F. Niles.  Dimensionality of Rotter's I-E Scale in Sri Lanka , 1981 .

[37]  Virgilio G. Enriquez.  Filipino Psychology in the Third World , 1977 .

[38]  Charles R. Kaut.  Utang Na Loob: A System of Contractual Obligation among Tagalogs , 1961, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology.

[39]  E. J. Bijnen,et al.  On Cross-Cultural Comparative Studies with the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire , 1986 .

[40]  Victor Barnouw,et al.  Culture and personality , 1964 .

[41]  H. Triandis,et al.  Measurement in Cross-Cultural Psychology , 1985 .

[42]  Maria Grigoroiu-Serbnescu.  Factor Structure and Validation of the Junior Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Based on a Romanian Sample , 1986 .

[43]  H. Triandis,et al.  Etic Plus Emic Versus Pseudoetic , 1983 .

[44]  John W. Berry,et al.  ON CROSS‐CULTURAL COMPARABILITY , 1969 .

[45]  R. Díaz-Guerrero.  Cross-cultural and national studies in social psychology , 1985 .

[46]  J. Butcher,et al.  A handbook of cross-national MMPI research , 1976 .

[47]  J. C. Flanagan.  Psychological Bulletin THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE , 2022 .

[48]  Leona E. Dahlstrom,et al.  Mmpi Patterns Of American Minorities , 1986 .

[49]  E. Jones,et al.  Personality Differences among Blacks in Jamaica and the United States , 1979 .

[50]  Virgilio G. Enriquez.  KAPWA: A CORE CONCEPT IN FILIPINO SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY , 1986 .

[51]  Analysis of the Modernity Scale , 1983 .

[52]  D. Jackson,et al.  The Cross-Cultural Generalizability of Personality Construct Measures , 1983 .

[53]  R. Cattell.  The Description and Measurement of Personality , 1947, Mental Health.

[54]  P. Pedersen.  Counseling Across Cultures , 1976 .

[55]  M. Gynther.  White norms and black MMPIs: a prescription for discrimination? , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[56]  H. Triandis,et al.  Ethnic Affirmation Versus Social Desirability , 1983 .

[57]  A. Rosenblatt,et al.  Racial Bias in the MMPI: A Methodological Review. , 1980 .