The left hand disrupts subsequent right hand grasping when their actions overlap.

Adaptive motor control is premised on the principle of movement minimization, which in turn is premised on a form of sensorimotor memory. But what is the nature of this memory and under what conditions does it operate? Here, we test the limits of sensorimotor memory in an intermanual context by testing the effect that the action performed by the left hand has on subsequent right hand grasps. Target feature-overlap predicts that sensorimotor memory is engaged when task-relevant sensory features of the target are similar across actions; partial effector-overlap predicts that sensorimotor memory is engaged when there is similarity in the task-relevant effectors used to perform an action; and the action-goal conjunction hypotheses predicts that sensorimotor memories are engaged when the action goal and the action type overlap. In three experiments, participants used their left hand to reach out and pick up an object, manually estimate its size, pinch it, look at it, or merely rest the left hand before reaching out to pick up a second object with their right hand. The in-flight anticipatory grip aperture of right-hand grasps was only influenced when it was preceded by grasps performed by the left-hand. Overlap in the sizes of the objects, partial overlap in the effectors used, and in the availability of haptic feedback bore no influence on this metric. These results support the hypothesis that intermanual transfer of sensorimotor memory on grasp execution is dependent on a conjunction of action type and goal.

[1]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: evidence that the dorsal stream does not only control visually guided actions in real time. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  C. Gonzalez,et al.  The inimitable mouth: task-dependent kinematic differences are independent of terminal precision , 2017, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Robert L. Whitwell,et al.  The influence of visual feedback from the recent past on the programming of grip aperture is grasp-specific, shared between hands, and mediated by sensorimotor memory not task set , 2015, Cognition.

[4]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Neural correlates of motor memory consolidation. , 1997, Science.

[6]  R. Ivry,et al.  The coordination of movement: optimal feedback control and beyond , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  Steven A. Jax,et al.  Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: evidence for abstract spatiotemporal forms in human motor control. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  A. Wing,et al.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. , 1986, Journal of motor behavior.

[9]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[10]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: Rapid decay of dorsal stream information , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  I ROCK,et al.  Vision and Touch: An Experimentally Created Conflict between the Two Senses , 1964, Science.

[12]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[13]  James Gordon,et al.  Manual asymmetries in grasp pre-shaping and transport–grasp coordination , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  Peter Dixon,et al.  Action and Memory , 2004 .

[15]  Kai Nan An,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the intrinsic muscles of the hand , 1991 .

[16]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Grasping future events: explicit knowledge of the availability of visual feedback fails to reliably influence prehension , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Tzvi Ganel,et al.  Hemispheric specialization for the visual control of action is independent of handedness. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  M. Gentilucci,et al.  Planning for action , 2020, Coaching with Research in Mind.

[19]  Claudia L R Gonzalez,et al.  Kinematics of ventrally mediated grasp-to-eat actions: right-hand advantage is dependent on dorsal stream input , 2018, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  R. Stickgold,et al.  Dissociable stages of human memory consolidation and reconsolidation , 2003, Nature.

[22]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Real-time vision, tactile cues, and visual form agnosia: removing haptic feedback from a “natural” grasping task induces pantomime-like grasps , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[23]  M. Teghtsoonian,et al.  Two varieties of perceived length , 1970 .

[24]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Updating the programming of a precision grip is a function of recent history of available feedback , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  DF's visual brain in action: The role of tactile cues , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  P. Dixon,et al.  Perseveration effects in reaching and grasping rely on motor priming and not perception , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  Steven W. Keele,et al.  Movement control in skilled motor performance. , 1968 .

[28]  J. Kuhtz-Buschbeck,et al.  Grasping with the left and right hand: a kinematic study , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  Accepted April,et al.  Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension , 1991 .

[30]  J. Kelso,et al.  Multifunctionality and switching in the coordination dynamics of reaching and grasping , 1994 .

[31]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  The bilateral reach to grasp movement , 1993, Behavioural Brain Research.

[32]  Jason W Flindall,et al.  Eating interrupted: the effect of intent on hand-to-mouth actions. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Principles of sensorimotor learning , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[34]  M. Goodale,et al.  Dual-task interference is greater in delayed grasping than in visually guided grasping. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[35]  Robert L. Whitwell,et al.  Unusual hand postures but not familiar tools show motor equivalence with precision grasping , 2016, Cognition.

[36]  L. Hedges,et al.  Introduction to Meta‐Analysis , 2009, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[37]  Charles E. Pettypiece,et al.  Integration of haptic and visual size cues in perception and action revealed through cross-modal conflict , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Tactile interference in visually guided reach-to-grasp movements , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[40]  M. A. Goodale,et al.  Practice makes perfect, but only with the right hand: Sensitivity to perceptual illusions with awkward grasps decreases with practice in the right but not the left hand , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  M. Ernst,et al.  Optimal integration of shape information from vision and touch , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  P. Dixon,et al.  Repetition effects in grasping. , 2012, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[43]  R. C. Oldfield THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[44]  Jason W Flindall,et al.  On the Evolution of Handedness: Evidence for Feeding Biases , 2013, PloS one.

[45]  M. Goodale,et al.  Explicit knowledge about the availability of visual feedback affects grasping with the left but not the right hand , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[46]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Patient DF’s visual brain in action: Visual feedforward control in visual form agnosia , 2015, Vision Research.

[47]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[48]  Rixin Tang,et al.  Programming of left hand exploits task set but that of right hand depends on recent history , 2017, Experimental Brain Research.

[49]  Flavio T. P. Oliveira,et al.  The Representation of Action , 2008, Current directions in psychological science.

[50]  M Gentilucci,et al.  Haptic information differentially interferes with visual analysis in reaching‐grasping control and in perceptual processes , 1998, Neuroreport.