Laboratory and Simulation Investigation of Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery by Gas Injection

Methane/carbon dioxide/nitrogen flow and adsorption behavior within coal is investigated simultaneously from a laboratory and simulation perspective. The samples are from a coalbed in the Powder River Basin, WY. They are characterized by methane, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen sorption isotherms, as well as porosity and permeability measurements. This coal adsorbs almost three times as much carbon dioxide as methane and exhibits significant hysteresis among pure-component adsorption and desorption isotherms that are characterized as Langmuir-like. Displacement experiments were conducted with pure nitrogen, pure carbon dioxide, and various mixtures. Recovery factors are greater than 94% of the OGIP. Most interestingly, the coal exhibited ability to separate nitrogen from carbon dioxide due to the preferential strong adsorption of carbon dioxide. Injection of a mixture rich in carbon dioxide gives slower initial recovery, increases breakthrough time, and decreases the volume of gas needed to sweep out the coalbed. Injection gas rich in nitrogen leads to relatively fast recovery of methane, earlier breakthrough, and a significant fraction of nitrogen in the produced gas at short times. A one-dimensional, two-phase (gas and solid) model was employed to rationalize and explain the experimental data and trends. Reproduction of binary behavior is characterized as excellent, whereas the dynamics of ternary systems are predicted with less accuracy. For these coals, the most sensitive simulation input were the multicomponent adsorption–desorption isotherms, including scanning loops. Additionally, the coal exhibited a two-porosity matrix that was incorporated numerically.

[1]  A. Benton,et al.  THE ADSORPTION OF GAS MIXTURES BY SILICA , 1931 .

[2]  Paul Massarotto,et al.  A review on recent advances in the numerical simulation for coalbed-methane-recovery process , 2005 .

[3]  D. Avnir,et al.  Effects of heterogeneous surface geometry on adsorption , 1993 .

[4]  John Crank,et al.  The Mathematics Of Diffusion , 1956 .

[5]  J. I. Joubert,et al.  Effect of moisture on the methane capacity of American coals , 1974 .

[6]  Scott H. Stevens,et al.  Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery Using CO2 Injection: Worldwide Resource and CO2 Sequestration Potential , 1998 .

[7]  R. Bustin,et al.  Binary gas adsorption/desorption isotherms: effect of moisture and coal composition upon carbon dioxide selectivity over methane , 2000 .

[8]  Bradley T. Mallison,et al.  A Fully Adaptive Streamline Framework for the Challenging Simulation of Gas-Injection Processes , 2005 .

[9]  D. Peng,et al.  A New Two-Constant Equation of State , 1976 .

[10]  T. J. Pratt,et al.  Measurement and Evaluation of Coal Sorption Isotherm Data , 1990 .

[11]  J. P. Seidle,et al.  Openhole cavity completions in coalbed methane wells in the San Juan basin , 1993 .

[12]  A. A. Reznik,et al.  An analysis of the effect of CO2 injection on the recovery of in situ methane from bituminous coal: an experimental simulation , 1984 .

[13]  Anthony R. Kovscek,et al.  Sorption-Induced Permeability Change of Coal During Gas-Injection Processes , 2008 .

[14]  William D. Gunter,et al.  Alberta Multiwell Micro-Pilot Testing for CBM Properties, Enhanced Methane Recovery and CO2 Storage Potential , 2004 .

[15]  Khaled A. M. Gasem,et al.  Adsorption of Pure Methane, Nitrogen, and Carbon Dioxide and Their Binary Mixtures on Wet Fruitland Coal , 1994 .

[16]  Analytical Theory of Coalbed Methane Recovery by Gas Injection , 2003 .