Structural flexibility of the nucleosome core particle at atomic resolution studied by molecular dynamics simulation.

Comparative explicit solvent molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have been performed on a complete nucleosome core particle with and without N-terminal histone tails for more than 20 ns. Main purpose of the simulations was to study the dynamics of mobile elements such as histone N-terminal tails and how packing and DNA-bending influences the fine structure and dynamics of DNA. Except for the tails, histone and DNA molecules stayed on average close to the crystallographic start structure supporting the quality of the current force field approach. Despite the packing strain, no increase of transitions to noncanonical nucleic acid backbone conformations compared to regular B-DNA was observed. The pattern of kinks and bends along the DNA remained close to the experiment overall. In addition to the local dynamics, the simulations allowed the analysis of the superhelical mobility indicating a limited relative mobility of DNA segments separated by one superhelical turn (mean relative displacement of approximately +/-0.2 nm, mainly along the superhelical axis). An even higher rigidity was found for relative motions (distance fluctuations) of segments separated by half a superhelical turn (approximately +/-0.1 nm). The N-terminal tails underwent dramatic conformational rearrangements on the nanosecond time scale toward partially and transiently wrapped states around the DNA. Many of the histone tail changes corresponded to coupled association and folding events from fully solvent-exposed states toward complexes with the major and minor grooves of DNA. The simulations indicate that the rapid conformational changes of the tails can modulate the DNA accessibility within a few nanoseconds.

[1]  J. Widom,et al.  Spontaneous Access of Proteins to Buried Nucleosomal DNA Target Sites Occurs via a Mechanism That Is Distinct from Nucleosome Translocation , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[2]  B. Bartholomew,et al.  SWI/SNF unwraps, slides, and rewraps the nucleosome. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[3]  Wei Zhang,et al.  A point‐charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed‐phase quantum mechanical calculations , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[4]  Tamar Schlick,et al.  Flexible histone tails in a new mesoscopic oligonucleosome model. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[5]  S. Khorasanizadeh The Nucleosome From Genomic Organization to Genomic Regulation , 2004, Cell.

[6]  T. Jenuwein,et al.  An epigenetic road map for histone lysine methylation , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[7]  J. Šponer,et al.  Structural and dynamic effects of single 7-hydro-8-oxoguanine bases located in a frameshift target DNA sequence. , 2005, Biophysical chemistry.

[8]  J. Widom,et al.  Nucleosomes facilitate their own invasion , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[9]  B. Turner,et al.  Reading signals on the nucleosome with a new nomenclature for modified histones , 2005, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[10]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[11]  Karolin Luger,et al.  Structure of the yeast nucleosome core particle reveals fundamental changes in internucleosome interactions , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[12]  Jef D Boeke,et al.  Regulated nucleosome mobility and the histone code , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[13]  R. Kornberg,et al.  Twenty-Five Years of the Nucleosome, Fundamental Particle of the Eukaryote Chromosome , 1999, Cell.

[14]  A. Sivolob,et al.  Nucleosome conformational flexibility and implications for chromatin dynamics , 2004, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[15]  T. Bishop,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of a Nucleosome and Free DNA , 2004, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[16]  C. Hunter,et al.  Sequence-dependent DNA structure: the role of the sugar-phosphate backbone. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  J. Widom,et al.  Role of DNA sequence in nucleosome stability and dynamics , 2001, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[18]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[19]  T. Richmond,et al.  Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution , 1997, Nature.

[20]  Dominique Durand,et al.  Role of histone tails in the conformation and interactions of nucleosome core particles. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[21]  T. Schlick,et al.  Electrostatic mechanism of nucleosomal array folding revealed by computer simulation. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  C. Bustamante,et al.  Rapid spontaneous accessibility of nucleosomal DNA , 2005, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[23]  P. Kollman,et al.  Settle: An analytical version of the SHAKE and RATTLE algorithm for rigid water models , 1992 .

[24]  Irene K. Moore,et al.  A genomic code for nucleosome positioning , 2006, Nature.

[25]  Dominique Durand,et al.  Salt-induced conformation and interaction changes of nucleosome core particles. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[26]  J. Langowski,et al.  Computer simulation of the 30-nanometer chromatin fiber. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[27]  Michelle D. Wang,et al.  Specific contributions of histone tails and their acetylation to the mechanical stability of nucleosomes. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  S. Doublié,et al.  Crystal structure of a bacteriophage T7 DNA replication complex at 2.2 Å resolution , 1998, Nature.

[29]  Helmut Schiessel,et al.  Nucleosome interactions in chromatin: fiber stiffening and hairpin formation. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  Gerrit Groenhof,et al.  GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[31]  T. Tsukiyama,et al.  Chromatin remodeling in vivo: evidence for a nucleosome sliding mechanism. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[32]  Mika A. Kastenholz,et al.  Development of a lattice-sum method emulating nonperiodic boundary conditions for the treatment of electrostatic interactions in molecular simulations: a continuum-electrostatics study. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[33]  Jory Z. Ruscio,et al.  A computational study of nucleosomal DNA flexibility. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[34]  T. Richmond,et al.  Solvent mediated interactions in the structure of the nucleosome core particle at 1.9 a resolution. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  Feng Ding,et al.  Multiscale modeling of nucleosome dynamics. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[36]  N C Seeman,et al.  RNA double helices generated from crystal structures of double helical dinucleoside phosphates. , 1976, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[37]  Xi He,et al.  Distinct strategies to make nucleosomal DNA accessible. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[38]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Effect of artificial periodicity in simulations of biomolecules under Ewald boundary conditions: a continuum electrostatics study. , 1999, Biophysical chemistry.

[39]  R. Kornberg,et al.  Chromatin structure and transcription. , 1992, Annual review of cell biology.

[40]  K. Luger,et al.  Crystal structures of nucleosome core particles in complex with minor groove DNA-binding ligands. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  Richard Lavery,et al.  Kinking occurs during molecular dynamics simulations of small DNA minicircles. , 2006, Structure.

[42]  J. Hansen,et al.  The nucleosomal array: structure/function relationships. , 1996, Critical reviews in eukaryotic gene expression.

[43]  J. Widom,et al.  DNA twisting flexibility and the formation of sharply looped protein-DNA complexes. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  N. Chandra,et al.  Molecular modeling of the chromatosome particle. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[45]  R Lavery,et al.  The definition of generalized helicoidal parameters and of axis curvature for irregular nucleic acids. , 1988, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[46]  T. Richmond,et al.  The structure of DNA in the nucleosome core , 2003, Nature.

[47]  Ilya Ioshikhes,et al.  Structural dynamics of nucleosome core particle: Comparison with nucleosomes containing histone variants , 2004, Proteins.

[48]  M. Groudine,et al.  Controlling the double helix , 2003, Nature.

[49]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[50]  Heinz Sklenar,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of the 136 unique tetranucleotide sequences of DNA oligonucleotides. II: sequence context effects on the dynamical structures of the 10 unique dinucleotide steps. , 2005, Biophysical journal.