Dimension stone industry should meet the fundamental values of geoethics

The term “Dimension Stone” refers to natural stone that has been quarried, selected and processed into specific sizes or shapes, with or without one or more mechanically dressed or finished surfaces, for use as building facing, curbing, paving stone, monuments and memorials, and various industrial products. The dimension stone industry is currently increasing the volume of its activities: based on a prudent medium-term development forecast, the net product could reach one hundred million tons in 2020. For this reason, geoscientists and stakeholders need to reason about methods and technologies in the dimension stone sector and how to operate responsibly and sustainably in accordance with the following geoethical values. After a definition of geoethics and an overview of the dimension stone industry, the paper focuses on fundamental values of geoethics as stated in the Cape Town Statement on Geoethics. More precisely, geoethical values have been referred to real and practical cases of dimension stone subsectors, by presenting some examples recorded in Sardinia (Italy). This region has a long history of production of ornamental stones. Finally, tips and suggestions on how geoscientists (in particular geologists and mining engineers) can help the dimension stone sector in a geoethical way, i.e., responsibly and sustainably are herein offered.

[1]  Silvia Peppoloni,et al.  Geoethics: Ethical, Social and Cultural Implications in Geosciences , 2017 .

[2]  Graziella Marras,et al.  Recovery of sawdust resulting from marble processing plants for future uses in high value-added products , 2014 .

[3]  Mamoon Allan,et al.  Geotourism: an opportunity to enhance geoethics and boost geoheritage appreciation , 2015, Special Publications.

[4]  Shrikant Daji Limaye.  A geoethical approach to industrial development of georesources and groundwater use: the Indian experience , 2015 .

[5]  Nicola Careddu,et al.  From landfill to water, land and life: The creation of the Centre for stone materials aimed at secondary processing , 2013 .

[6]  Silvia Peppoloni,et al.  The Cape Town Statement on Geoethics , 2017 .

[7]  Nicola Careddu,et al.  Dimension stones in the circular economy world , 2019, Resources Policy.

[8]  G. Costa,et al.  Working the surfaces of non-flammable ornamental rocks with water-jets technology (Part one) , 2007 .

[9]  Tony Mayer.  Research Integrity: The Bedrock of the Geosciences , 2015 .

[10]  Nicola Careddu,et al.  Sardinian Basalt—an Ancient Georesource Still En Vogue , 2018, Geoheritage.

[11]  Graziella Marras,et al.  The crisis of granite and the success of marble: errors and market strategies. The Sardinian case , 2017 .

[12]  Quintino Sella,et al.  Sulle condizioni dell'Industria mineraria : nell'isola di Sardegna : relazione alla commissione parlamentare d'inchiesta , 1871 .

[13]  Silvia Peppoloni,et al.  Geoethics and geological culture: awareness, responsibility and challenges , 2012 .

[14]  Nicola Careddu,et al.  Promoting ecological sustainable planning for natural stone quarrying. The case of the Orosei Marble Producing Area in Eastern Sardinia , 2011 .

[15]  Gregory R. Wessel.  Beyond sustainability: A restorative approach for the mineral industry , 2016 .

[16]  Silvia Peppoloni,et al.  Contemporary Geoethics Within the Geosciences , 2019, Exploring Geoethics.

[17]  Silvia Peppoloni,et al.  Geoethics: Ethical, social, and cultural values in geosciences research, practice, and education , 2016 .

[18]  Silvia Peppoloni,et al.  Geoethics: A Challenge for Research Integrity in Geosciences , 2015 .

[19]  B. R. Marker,et al.  Towards International Designation of a Heritage Dimension Stone , 2013 .

[20]  Vincent S. Cronin,et al.  THE EMERGING FIELD OF GEOETHICS , 2017 .

[21]  Guido Gosso,et al.  The “Geoethical Promise”: A Proposal , 2014 .