Qualitative process study to explore the perceived burdens and benefits of a digital intervention for self-managing high blood pressure in Primary Care in the UK

Objectives Digital interventions can change patients’ experiences of managing their health, either creating additional burden or improving their experience of healthcare. This qualitative study aimed to explore perceived burdens and benefits for patients using a digital self-management intervention for reducing high blood pressure. A secondary aim was to further our understanding of how best to capture burdens and benefits when evaluating health interventions. Design Inductive qualitative process study nested in a randomised controlled trial. Setting Primary Care in the UK. Participants 35 participants taking antihypertensive medication and with uncontrolled blood pressure at baseline participated in semistructured telephone interviews. Intervention Digital self-management intervention to support blood pressure self-monitoring and medication change when recommended by the healthcare professional. Analysis Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis with techniques from grounded theory. Results Seven themes were developed which reflected perceived burdens and benefits of using the intervention, including worry about health, uncertainty about self-monitoring and reassurance. The analysis showed how beliefs about their condition and treatment appeared to influence participants’ appraisal of the value of the intervention. This suggested that considering illness and treatment perceptions in Burden of Treatment theory could further our understanding of how individuals appraise the personal costs and benefits of self-managing their health. Conclusions Patients’ appraisal of the burden or benefit of using a complex self-management intervention seemed to be influenced by experiences within the intervention (such as perceived availability of support) and beliefs about their condition and treatment (such as perceived control and risk of side effects). Developing our ability to adequately capture these salient burdens and benefits for patients could help enhance evaluation of self-management interventions in the future. Many participants perceived important benefits from using the intervention, highlighting the need for theory to recognise that engaging in self-management can include positive as well as negative aspects. Trial registration number ISRCTN13790648; Pre-results.

[1]  C. L. Callahan,et al.  The quality of life. , 1970, Nursing outlook.

[2]  R. Sugden,et al.  The Quality of Life. , 1994 .

[3]  P. Shackley,et al.  Does "process utility" exist? A case study of willingness to pay for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[4]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded Theory in Practice , 1997 .

[5]  J. Weinman,et al.  Patients' beliefs about prescribed medicines and their role in adherence to treatment in chronic physical illness. , 1999, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[6]  L. Yardley,et al.  Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology , 2003 .

[7]  Howard Leventhal,et al.  Illness cognition: Using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition interactions , 1992, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[8]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[9]  P. Sainsbury,et al.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[10]  Jonathan Boymal,et al.  Qualitative cost-benefit evaluation of complex, emergent programs. , 2009, Evaluation and program planning.

[11]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  Individualized Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , 2011, PLoS medicine.

[12]  J. Coast,et al.  University of Birmingham Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-A. , 2012 .

[13]  F. Mair,et al.  Understanding Patients’ Experiences of Treatment Burden in Chronic Heart Failure Using Normalization Process Theory , 2011, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[14]  C. Carswell Measuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Valuation , 2007, PharmacoEconomics.

[15]  J. Brazier,et al.  Outcomes of social care for adults: developing a preference-weighted measure. , 2012, Health technology assessment.

[16]  C. May,et al.  Building a measurement framework of burden of treatment in complex patients with chronic conditions: a qualitative study , 2012, Patient related outcome measures.

[17]  Paul Wicks,et al.  Adaptation and validation of the Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ) in English using an internet platform , 2014, BMC Medicine.

[18]  Alison Richardson,et al.  Rethinking the patient: using Burden of Treatment Theory to understand the changing dynamics of illness , 2014, BMC Health Services Research.

[19]  J. Coast,et al.  The Development of Capability Measures in Health Economics: Opportunities, Challenges and Progress , 2015, The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.

[20]  M. Ryan,et al.  Valuing patients' experiences of healthcare processes: Towards broader applications of existing methods☆ , 2014, Social science & medicine.

[21]  F. Mair,et al.  Thinking about the burden of treatment , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory , 2014 .

[23]  L. Yardley,et al.  The Person-Based Approach to Intervention Development: Application to Digital Health-Related Behavior Change Interventions , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[24]  A. O’Cathain,et al.  Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  M. Kelly,et al.  Designing and Undertaking a Health Economics Study of Digital Health Interventions. , 2016, American journal of preventive medicine.

[26]  J. Raftery,et al.  Home and Online Management and Evaluation of Blood Pressure (HOME BP) digital intervention for self-management of uncontrolled, essential hypertension: a protocol for the randomised controlled HOME BP trial , 2016, BMJ Open.

[27]  C. May,et al.  Development and validation of the Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-management (PETS): a patient-reported measure of treatment burden , 2017, Quality of Life Research.

[28]  T. Trikalinos,et al.  Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses: Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. , 2016, JAMA.

[29]  F. Mair,et al.  Intervention planning for a digital intervention for self-management of hypertension: a theory-, evidence- and person-based approach , 2017, Implementation Science.