Selective non‐operative management of abdominal stab wounds is a safe and cost effective strategy: A South African experience

INTRODUCTION Selective non‐operative management (SNOM) of abdominal stab wounds is well established in South Africa. SNOM reduces the morbidity associated with negative laparotomies while being safe. Despite steady advances in technology (including laparoscopy, computed tomography [CT] and point‐of‐care sonography), our approach has remained clinically driven. Assessments of financial implications are limited in the literature. The aim of this study was to review isolated penetrating abdominal trauma and analyse associated incurred expenses. METHODS Patients data across the Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service (PMTS) are captured prospectively into the regional electronic trauma registry. A bottom‐up microcosting technique produced estimated average costs for our defined clinical protocols. RESULTS Between January 2012 and April 2015, 501 patients were treated for an isolated abdominal stab wound. Over one third (38%) were managed successfully with SNOM, 5% underwent a negative laparotomy and over half (57%) required a therapeutic laparotomy. Over five years, the PMTS can expect to spend a minimum of ZAR 20,479,800 (GBP 1,246,840) for isolated penetrating abdominal stab wounds alone. CONCLUSIONS Provided a stringent policy is followed, in carefully selected patients, SNOM is effective in detecting those who require further intervention. It minimises the risks associated with unnecessary surgical interventions. SNOM will continue to be clinically driven and promulgated in our environment.

[1]  Shahin Hajibandeh,et al.  Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of penetrating abdominal trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2016, International journal of surgery.

[2]  F. Başak,et al.  The management of penetrating abdominal stab wounds with organ or omentum evisceration: The results of a clinical trial. , 2014, Ulusal cerrahi dergisi.

[3]  V. Kong,et al.  The cost effectiveness of early management of acute appendicitis underlies the importance of curative surgical services to a primary healthcare programme. , 2013, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[4]  E. Haut,et al.  Outcome of selective non‐operative management of penetrating abdominal injuries from the North American National Trauma Database , 2012, British Journal of Surgery.

[5]  D. Clarke,et al.  An audit of failed non-operative management of abdominal stab wounds. , 2010, Injury.

[6]  J. Como,et al.  Practice management guidelines for selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal trauma. , 2010, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  B. Manns,et al.  The impact of using different costing methods on the results of an economic evaluation of cardiac care: microcosting vs gross-costing approaches. , 2009, Health economics.

[8]  G. Mostafa,et al.  Evaluation of selective treatment of penetrating abdominal trauma. , 2008, Journal of surgical education.

[9]  R. Norman,et al.  The high burden of injuries in South Africa. , 2007, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[10]  L. Baker,et al.  Selective management of abdominal and thoracic stab wounds with established peritoneal penetration: the eviscerated omentum. , 1987, American journal of surgery.

[11]  D. Demetriades,et al.  Selective conservative management of penetrating abdominal wounds: A prospective study , 1984, The British journal of surgery.

[12]  G. Shaftan Indications for operation in abdominal trauma. , 1960, American journal of surgery.

[13]  A. Prando Selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries , 2017 .

[14]  D. Clarke,et al.  The hospital cost of road traffic accidents at a South African regional trauma centre: a micro-costing study. , 2014, Injury.

[15]  D. MMedSci,et al.  Selective Conservatism in Trauma Management: A South African Contribution , 2005, World Journal of Surgery.