Development of biodegradable customized tibial scaffold with advanced architected materials utilizing additive manufacturing.

In the last decade, the development of customized biodegradable scaffolds and implants has attracted increased scientific interest due to the fact that additive manufacturing technologies allow for the rapid production of implants with high geometric complexity constructed via commercial biodegradable polymers. In this study, innovative designs of tibial scaffold in form of bone-brick configuration were developed to fill the bone gap utilizing advanced architected materials and bio-inspired diffusion canals. The architected materials and canals provide high porosity, as well as a high surface area to volume ratio in the scaffold facilitating that way in the tissue regeneration process and in withstanding the applied external loads. The cellular structures applied in this work were the Schwarz Diamond (SD) and a hybrid SD&FCC hybrid cellular material, which is a completely new architected material that derived from the combination of SD and Face Centered Cubic (FCC) structures. These designs were additively manufactured utilizing two biodegradable materials namely Polylactic acid (PLA) and Polycaprolactone (PCL), using the Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) technique, in order to avoid the surgery, for the scaffold's removal after the bone regeneration. Furthermore, the additively manufactured scaffolds were examined in terms of compatibility and assembly with the bone's physical model, as well as, in terms of mechanical behavior under realistic static loads. In addition, non-linear finite element models (FEMs) were developed based on the experimental data to accurately simulate the mechanical response of the examined scaffolds. The Finite Element Analysis (FEA) results were compared with the experimental response and afterwards the stress concentration regions were observed and identified. Τhe proposed design of scaffold with SD&FCC lattice structure made of PLA material with a relative density of 20% revealed the best overall performance, showing that it is the most suitable candidate for further investigation (in-vivo test, clinical trials, etc.) and commercialization.

[1]  D. Tzetzis,et al.  Development of novel additive manufactured hybrid architected materials and investigation of their mechanical behavior , 2023, Mechanics of Materials.

[2]  D. Tzetzis,et al.  Architected Materials for Additive Manufacturing: A Comprehensive Review , 2022, Materials.

[3]  D. Tzovaras,et al.  Design and Development of a Multi-Functional Bioinspired Soft Robotic Actuator via Additive Manufacturing , 2022, Biomimetics.

[4]  D. Tzovaras,et al.  Effective mechanical properties of additive manufactured triply periodic minimal surfaces: experimental and finite element study , 2022, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[5]  I. Jasiuk,et al.  Biomimetic design of implants for long bone critical-sized defects. , 2022, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[6]  K. Essa,et al.  Fabrication and Optimisation of Ti-6Al-4V Lattice-Structured Total Shoulder Implants Using Laser Additive Manufacturing , 2022, Materials.

[7]  P. Bártolo,et al.  Bone Bricks: The Effect of Architecture and Material Composition on the Mechanical and Biological Performance of Bone Scaffolds , 2022, ACS omega.

[8]  D. Tzovaras,et al.  Machine Learning-Based Mechanical Behavior Optimization of 3D Print Constructs Manufactured Via the FFF Process , 2022, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance.

[9]  Chastine Fatichah,et al.  Reconstructing and resizing 3D images from DICOM files , 2020, J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci..

[10]  A. Ardeshirylajimi,et al.  3D-Printed PCL Scaffolds Coated with Nanobioceramics Enhance Osteogenic Differentiation of Stem Cells , 2021, ACS omega.

[11]  B. Piotrowski,et al.  Numerical investigation of the effective mechanical properties and local stress distributions of TPMS-based and strut-based lattices for biomedical applications. , 2021, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[12]  D. Tzovaras,et al.  Effective Mechanical Properties of Additive Manufactured Strut‐Lattice Structures: Experimental and Finite Element Study , 2021, Advanced Engineering Materials.

[13]  Qing Han,et al.  The advances of topology optimization techniques in orthopedic implants: A review , 2021, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[14]  D. Tzovaras,et al.  A case study on 3D scanning, digital reparation and rapid metal additive manufacturing of a centrifugal impeller , 2021 .

[15]  Dimitrios Tzovaras,et al.  Learning-based error modeling in FDM 3D printing process , 2021 .

[16]  Vincent Boly,et al.  3D printing: An emerging opportunity for soil science , 2020 .

[17]  S. Vaudreuil,et al.  Manufacturing of a metallic 3D framework coated with a bioglass matrix for implant applications , 2020, Journal of Materials Science.

[18]  Jiping Lu,et al.  Design and Optimization of Lattice Structures: A Review , 2020, Applied Sciences.

[19]  D. Tzetzis,et al.  Finite Element Analysis of Orthopedic Hip Implant with Functionally Graded Bioinspired Lattice Structures , 2020, Biomimetics.

[20]  Chengtie Wu,et al.  3D printing of Haversian bone–mimicking scaffolds for multicellular delivery in bone regeneration , 2020, Science Advances.

[21]  L. Ambrosio,et al.  3D Patterning of cells in Magnetic Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[22]  W. Deng,et al.  Implant surface modification strategies through antibacterial and bioactive components , 2020 .

[23]  Jung-Soo Lee,et al.  Development of a biodegradable polycaprolactone film incorporated with an antimicrobial agent via an extrusion process , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[24]  Haopeng Ma,et al.  3D printing of HA / PCL composite tissue engineering scaffolds , 2019, Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research.

[25]  Carmen M. González-Henríquez,et al.  Polymers for additive manufacturing and 4D-printing: Materials, methodologies, and biomedical applications , 2019, Progress in Polymer Science.

[26]  Gordon W. Blunn,et al.  Biomanufacturing of customized modular scaffolds for critical bone defects , 2019, CIRP Annals.

[27]  J. Mano,et al.  Bone physiology as inspiration for tissue regenerative therapies. , 2018, Biomaterials.

[28]  J. Ciurana,et al.  Design of a Scaffold Parameter Selection System with Additive Manufacturing for a Biomedical Cell Culture , 2018, Materials.

[29]  A. Schroeder,et al.  Biocompatibility, biodegradation and excretion of polylactic acid (PLA) in medical implants and theranostic systems. , 2018, Chemical engineering journal.

[30]  Frank Schulze,et al.  Journey into Bone Models: A Review , 2018, Genes.

[31]  Damiano Pasini,et al.  Fully porous 3D printed titanium femoral stem to reduce stress‐shielding following total hip arthroplasty , 2017, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[32]  A. Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Additive manufacturing: scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities , 2017 .

[33]  W. Yeong,et al.  Metallic powder-bed based 3D printing of cellular scaffolds for orthopaedic implants: A state-of-the-art review on manufacturing, topological design, mechanical properties and biocompatibility. , 2017, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[34]  R. Bieger,et al.  Outcome of extensive varus and valgus stem alignment in short-stem THA: clinical and radiological analysis using EBRA-FCA , 2017, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[35]  Saeed Reza Motamedian,et al.  Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering: a literature review. , 2017, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[36]  Tait D. McLouth,et al.  Influence of processing and orientation print effects on the mechanical and thermal behavior of 3D-Printed ULTEM® 9085 Material , 2017 .

[37]  Jennifer L. Jordan,et al.  High Strain Rate Mechanics of Polymers: A Review , 2016, Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials.

[38]  P. Bártolo,et al.  Bone Tissue Engineering: 3D PCL-based Nanocomposite Scaffolds with Tailored Properties , 2016 .

[39]  Katarina Čolić,et al.  Finite Element Modeling of Hip Implant Static Loading , 2016 .

[40]  Peter Ifju,et al.  Experimental characterization of the mechanical properties of 3D-printed ABS and polycarbonate parts , 2017 .

[41]  F. Haddad,et al.  Financial analysis of revision knee surgery based on NHS tariffs and hospital costs: does it pay to provide a revision service? , 2015, The bone & joint journal.

[42]  S. Kang,et al.  Bone Regeneration of Hydroxyapatite/Alumina Bilayered Scaffold with 3 mm Passage-Like Medullary Canal in Canine Tibia Model , 2015, BioMed research international.

[43]  E. Díaz,et al.  In vitro degradation of Poly(caprolactone)/nHA composites , 2014 .

[44]  Jan Henkel,et al.  Bone Regeneration Based on Tissue Engineering Conceptions — A 21st Century Perspective , 2013, Bone Research.

[45]  P. Nair,et al.  A large scale finite element study of a cementless osseointegrated tibial tray. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[46]  A. Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Influence of porosity on mechanical properties and in vivo response of Ti6Al4V implants. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[47]  M. Tulder.  Chapter 1 , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[48]  Tarun Goswami,et al.  Review of wear mechanisms in hip implants: Paper I – General , 2004 .

[49]  N Tosun,et al.  Anatomical Characteristics of the Tibial Medullary Canal and Their Implications for Intramedullary Fixation , 2003, The Journal of international medical research.

[50]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.