A CT-based method to compute femur remodelling after total hip arthroplasty

ABSTRACT Bone remodelling after total hip arthroplasty has been largely observed and investigated. Most studies rely on projective images and only few obtain 3D information with limited spatial resolution. This study proposes a method to provide quantitative, 3D high-resolution data about femur bone density variations, by means of CT volume processing. This would offer a tool for further research and clinical studies. Five patients subjected to primary, cementless total hip arthroplasty were considered. Calibrated CT volumes were acquired before, just after surgery and 1 yr later. Bone remodelling hinders accurate alignment of femur volumes acquired after a year; instead, prosthesis stem remains unchanged. Thus, after metal artefact reduction, prosthesis was segmented, and stem-based accurate alignment was obtained. A test to exclude prosthesis migration was performed by considering specific femur anatomical landmarks. Bone density error due to artefact reduction and realignment was estimated. Quantitative differences in bone mineral density were computed for each voxel, providing a resolution of about 1 mm. Preliminary results showed that the femur underwent consistent remodelling after a year. Widespread bone density losses appeared in those areas where strain-adaptive remodelling is normally expected, particularly about the calcar. Conversely, distal areas with clear stem-bone contact showed considerable density gains.

[1]  N. Sugano,et al.  Effect of robotic milling on periprosthetic bone remodeling , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[2]  P Herberts,et al.  Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: A review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases , 2000, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[3]  R. Forst,et al.  Quantitative computed tomography-assisted osteodensitometry of the pelvis after press-fit cup fixation: a prospective ten-year follow-up. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  T. Moilanen,et al.  The effects of cementless femoral stem shape and proximal surface texture on ’fit-and-fill’ characteristics and on bone remodeling , 2000, International Orthopaedics.

[5]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  High-spatial-resolution bone densitometry with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric region-free analysis. , 2015, Radiology.

[6]  H. Kröger,et al.  Periprosthetic BMD after cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a 10-year follow-up study , 2015, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[7]  Visco-elastic and thermal-induced damaging in time-dependent reshaping of human cornea after conductive keratoplasty , 2017 .

[8]  M. Fraldi,et al.  X-ray based technique for estimating bone fracture risk , 2009 .

[9]  Y. Ishii,et al.  Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur after total knee arthroplasty. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[10]  W H Harris,et al.  Will stress shielding limit the longevity of cemented femoral components of total hip replacement? , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  Nilanjan Dey,et al.  Open-Source Software Platform , 2016 .

[12]  K. Brixen,et al.  Changes in bone mineral density (BMD) around the cemented Exeter stem: A prospective study in 18 women with 5 years follow‐up , 2008, Acta orthopaedica.

[13]  J. W. Park,et al.  Comparison of total hip replacement with and without cement in patients younger than 50 years of age: the results at 18 years. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  M J Fagan,et al.  Role of the collar on the femoral stem of cemented total hip replacements. , 1986, Journal of Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  C. Varnum Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome. , 2017, Danish medical journal.

[16]  C. Engh,et al.  Principles, techniques, results, and complications with a porous-coated sintered metal system. , 1986, Instructional course lectures.

[17]  Maria Romano,et al.  Lean Six Sigma: a new approach to the management of patients undergoing prosthetic hip replacement surgery. , 2015, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[18]  L Esposito,et al.  Singularity-free finite element model of bone through automated voxel-based reconstruction , 2016, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[19]  C. Engh,et al.  Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[20]  Pekka Pulkkinen,et al.  Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  C. Engh,et al.  A Three-dimensional Method for Evaluating Changes in Acetabular Osteolytic Lesions in Response to Treatment , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  I. Anderson,et al.  Analyzing bone remodeling patterns after total hip arthroplasty using quantitative computed tomography and patient-specific 3D computational models. , 2015, Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery.

[23]  D. Howie,et al.  Progression of acetabular periprosthetic osteolytic lesions measured with computed tomography. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  E. Vanninen,et al.  Periprosthetic Bone Turnover after Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Measured by Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography , 2012, Scandinavian journal of surgery : SJS : official organ for the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society.

[25]  Alex Newman,et al.  Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. , 2022, Anesthesiology clinics.

[26]  Luca Cristofolini,et al.  Patient-specific mobility assessment to monitor recovery after total hip arthroplasty , 2018, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[27]  A. Toms,et al.  CT and MRI of hip arthroplasty. , 2007, Clinical radiology.

[28]  S David Stulberg,et al.  Use of Helical Computed Tomography for the Assessment of Acetabular Osteolysis After Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[29]  W H Harris,et al.  A quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[30]  R. Huiskes,et al.  The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[31]  L Cristofolini,et al.  In vitro stress shielding measurements can be affected by large errors. , 1999, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[32]  L. Cristofolini,et al.  Three dimensional bone mineral density changes in the femur over 1 year in primary total hip arthroplasty patients. , 2020, Clinical biomechanics.

[33]  N. Sugano,et al.  Longitudinal Evaluation of Time Related Bone Remodeling After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[34]  Henrik Malchau,et al.  Failure rate of cemented and uncemented total hip replacements: register study of combined Nordic database of four nations , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[35]  Cameron Walker,et al.  Femoral bone density changes after total hip arthroplasty with uncemented taper-design stem: a five year follow-up study , 2010, International Orthopaedics.

[36]  G. Lyritis,et al.  The long-term clinical relevance of calcar atrophy caused by stress shielding in total hip arthroplasty: a 10-year, prospective, randomized study. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[37]  R. Bader,et al.  Bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis – a prospective 5 year follow-up , 2015, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[38]  K. Bose,et al.  Periprosthetic bone remodelling after cementless total hip replacement. A prospective comparison of two different implant designs. , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[39]  D. Fleischmann,et al.  Evaluation of two iterative techniques for reducing metal artifacts in computed tomography. , 2011, Radiology.

[40]  D. Howie,et al.  Progression of periacetabular osteolytic lesions. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[41]  A. Tsertsvadze,et al.  Total Hip Replacement for the Treatment of End Stage Arthritis of the Hip: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2014, PloS one.

[42]  K. J. Chun Bone densitometry. , 2011, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[43]  R. Mazess Bone densitometry. , 1986, British medical journal.

[44]  Jacob T. Munro,et al.  Quantitative CT-assisted osteodensitometry of femoral adaptive bone remodelling after uncemented total hip arthroplasty , 2008, International Orthopaedics.

[45]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Quantitating the effect of prosthesis design on femoral remodeling using high‐resolution region‐free densitometric analysis (DXA‐RFA) , 2017, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[46]  R. Leppek,et al.  Volumetric measurement of periprosthetic bone remodeling: prospective 5 years follow-up after cemented total hip arthroplasty , 2007, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[47]  L. Cristofolini,et al.  In vitro testing of a novel limb salvage prosthesis for the distal femur. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[48]  P. Bifulco,et al.  CT-Based Bone and Muscle Assessment in Normal and Pathological Conditions , 2019, Encyclopedia of Biomedical Engineering.

[49]  Naoto Saito,et al.  Poor bone quality or hip structure as risk factors affecting survival of total-hip arthroplasty , 2000, The Lancet.

[50]  Engh Ca,et al.  Principles, techniques, results, and complications with a porous-coated sintered metal system. , 1986 .

[51]  L. Weidenhielm,et al.  Computed tomography vs. digital radiography assessment for detection of osteolysis in asymptomatic patients with uncemented cups: a proposal for a new classification system based on computer tomography. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[52]  Assessment of total hip arthroplasty by means of computed tomography 3D models and fracture risk evaluation. , 2013, Artificial organs.

[53]  W. Kalender,et al.  Reduction of CT artifacts caused by metallic implants. , 1987 .

[54]  S. Cowin,et al.  Topological optimization in hip prosthesis design , 2010, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[55]  C. Engh,et al.  Hip arthroplasty with a Moore prosthesis with porous coating. A five-year study. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[56]  G. Steinberg,et al.  Quantifying bone loss from the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[57]  G. ter Riet,et al.  Precision of Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Determining Periprosthetic Bone Mineral Density of the Hydroxyapatite Coated Hip Prosthesis , 2000 .

[58]  P. Bifulco,et al.  Towards a patient-specific estimation of intra-operative femoral fracture risk , 2018, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[59]  N. Sheth,et al.  Femoral Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management , 2013, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[60]  J. Jurvelin,et al.  Periprosthetic bone loss after cemented total hip arthroplasty , 2003, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[61]  B. Espehaug,et al.  Early aseptic loosening of uncemented femoral components in primary total hip replacement. A review based on the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[62]  A. Fottner,et al.  Sports Activity After Short-Stem Hip Arthroplasty , 2012, The American journal of sports medicine.

[63]  Alejandro F Frangi,et al.  Use of high resolution dual‐energy x‐ray absorptiometry‐region free analysis (DXA‐RFA) to detect local periprosthetic bone remodeling events , 2015, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[64]  M. Fraldi,et al.  Towards an App to Estimate Patient-Specific Perioperative Femur Fracture Risk , 2020, Applied Sciences.

[65]  J. Boldt,et al.  Long-term Bone Remodeling in HA-coated Stems: A Radiographic Review of 208 Total Hip Arthroplasties (THAs) with 15 to 20 Years Follow-up. , 2015, Surgical technology international.

[66]  A. Eskelinen,et al.  Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register , 2005, Acta orthopaedica.

[67]  H. Amstutz,et al.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. , 1979, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[68]  R. Klaghofer,et al.  Bone loss after total hip arthroplasty , 2006, Rheumatology International.

[69]  H. Bougherara,et al.  Predicting bone remodeling in response to total hip arthroplasty: computational study using mechanobiochemical model. , 2014, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[70]  P. Thunberg,et al.  Metal artefact reduction in CT imaging of hip prostheses—an evaluation of commercial techniques provided by four vendors. , 2015, The British journal of radiology.