Dam safety prediction model considering chaotic characteristics in prototype monitoring data series

Support vector machine, chaos theory, and particle swarm optimization are combined to build the prediction model of dam safety. The approaches are proposed to optimize the input and parameter of prediction model. First, the phase space reconstruction of prototype monitoring data series on dam behavior is implemented. The method identifying chaotic characteristics in monitoring data series is presented. Second, support vector machine is adopted to build the prediction model of dam safety. The characteristic vector of historical monitoring data, which is taken as support vector machine input, is extracted by phase space reconstruction. The chaotic particle swarm optimization algorithm is introduced to determine support vector machine parameters. A chaotic support vector machine–based prediction model of dam safety is built. Finally, the displacement behavior of one actual dam is taken as an example. The prediction capability on the built prediction model of dam displacement is evaluated. It is indicated that the proposed chaotic support vector machine–based model can provide more accurate forecasted results and is more suitable to be used to identify efficiently the dam behavior.

[1]  P. Grassberger,et al.  Characterization of Strange Attractors , 1983 .

[2]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  A tutorial on support vector regression , 2004, Stat. Comput..

[3]  Johan A. K. Suykens,et al.  Weighted least squares support vector machines: robustness and sparse approximation , 2002, Neurocomputing.

[4]  Chang Xu,et al.  Hybrid GA/SIMPLS as alternative regression model in dam deformation analysis , 2012, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[5]  H. S. Kim,et al.  Nonlinear dynamics , delay times , and embedding windows , 1999 .

[6]  P. Grassberger,et al.  Measuring the Strangeness of Strange Attractors , 1983 .

[7]  José Sá da Costa,et al.  Constructing statistical models for arch dam deformation , 2014 .

[8]  K. R. Al-Balushi,et al.  Artificial neural networks and support vector machines with genetic algorithm for bearing fault detection , 2003 .

[9]  José Antonio Torres Arriaza,et al.  Training of support vector machine with the use of multivariate normalization , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[10]  Nenad Grujovic,et al.  Development of support vector regression identification model for prediction of dam structural behaviour , 2014 .

[11]  Yi Jin,et al.  Singular value diagnosis in dam safety monitoring effect values , 2011 .

[12]  Huaizhi Su,et al.  Study on an Intelligent Inference Engine in Early-Warning System of Dam Health , 2011 .

[13]  Junjie Li,et al.  Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm Optimized Support Vector Regression for System Reliability Analysis of Slopes , 2016, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[14]  M. Rosenstein,et al.  A practical method for calculating largest Lyapunov exponents from small data sets , 1993 .

[15]  Huaizhi Su,et al.  Multifractal scaling behavior analysis for existing dams , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[16]  X H Wang,et al.  Damage localization in hydraulic turbine blades using kernel-independent component analysis and support vector machines , 2009 .

[17]  Norden E. Huang,et al.  Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition: a Noise-Assisted Data Analysis Method , 2009, Adv. Data Sci. Adapt. Anal..

[18]  Siyang Zhang,et al.  A novel hybrid KPCA and SVM with GA model for intrusion detection , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[19]  Jong-Duk Son,et al.  Fault diagnosis of low speed bearing based on relevance vector machine and support vector machine , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..