[Validation of the Polish version of the Athens Insomnia Scale].

AIMS To validate the Polish version of the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), the instrument designed for quantitative measurement of the severity of insomnia based on the ICD-10 criteria. METHOD The AIS was administered to 356 subjects: 160 patients from the sleep clinic presenting with ICD-10 non-organic insomnia (90f; mean age: 44.9 +/- 15.7y) and 196 self-defined good sleepers (106f; mean age: 43.9 +/- 13.4y). To assess psychometric properties of the scale, principal component analysis, Cronbach's alpha, Pearson's correlation (test-retest reliability: two weeks interval; n = 48) and sensitivity-specificity analysis were computed. RESULTS Using the factor analysis only one factor was extracted, which accounted for 60.2% of the variance. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90) and the test-retest reliability (r2 = 0.92) of the AIS were found to be very satisfactory. These values remain practically unchanged when any of the items was removed from the analysis. As expected, subjects with insomnia scored significantly higher on the AIS than good sleepers (14.2 +/- 3.9 pts vs. 4.8 +/- 3 pts; t = 24.9; p < 0.001). Considering the balance between sensitivity and specificity, a score of 8 was indicated as the optimum cut-off, with 89% overall correct case identification--94% patients with insomnia and 84% healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS Standardisation of the diagnostic process of insomnia is a highly important task in clinical practice, epidemiological considerations and treatment outcomes assessment. The AIS is a brief, self-reported measure of insomnia that may improve these assessments. The good psychometric properties of the Polish version of the AIS were confirmed in the present study.

[1]  M. Fornal-Pawłowska,et al.  Terapia poznawczo-behawioralna w leczeniu bezsenności przewlekłej , 2008 .

[2]  Sonia Ancoli-Israel,et al.  Recommendations for a standard research assessment of insomnia. , 2006, Sleep.

[3]  D. Léger,et al.  Professional correlates of insomnia. , 2006, Sleep.

[4]  Daniel J Buysse,et al.  Self-report measures of insomnia in adults: rationales, choices, and needs. , 2004, Sleep medicine reviews.

[5]  T. Paparrigopoulos,et al.  The diagnostic validity of the Athens Insomnia Scale. , 2003, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[6]  C. Morin Measuring outcomes in randomized clinical trials of insomnia treatments. , 2003, Sleep medicine reviews.

[7]  Maurice M Ohayon,et al.  Epidemiology of insomnia: what we know and what we still need to learn. , 2002, Sleep medicine reviews.

[8]  T. Paparrigopoulos,et al.  Athens Insomnia Scale: validation of an instrument based on ICD-10 criteria. , 2000, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[9]  S. Cole,et al.  Insomnia and heart disease: a review of epidemiologic studies. , 1999, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[10]  G. Zammit,et al.  Quality of life in people with insomnia. , 1999, Sleep.

[11]  T. Roth,et al.  Special report from a symposium held by the World Health Organization and the World Federation of Sleep Research Societies: an overview of insomnias and related disorders--recognition, epidemiology, and rational management. , 1996, Sleep.

[12]  D. Ford,et al.  Epidemiologic study of sleep disturbances and psychiatric disorders. An opportunity for prevention? , 1989, JAMA.

[13]  C. Soldatos,et al.  How do individuals sleep around the world? Results from a single-day survey in ten countries. , 2005, Sleep medicine.