Implantation of Stimulation Electrodes in the Subretinal Space to Demonstrate Cortical Responses in Yucatan Minipig in the Course of Visual Prosthesis Development

Purpose During the course of the development of visual prostheses, subretinal stimulation films were implanted in micropigs in order to prove the feasibility of subretinal electrical stimulation with subsequent cortical response. One aim was to demonstrate that epidural recording of visual evoked potentials is possible in the micropig. Methods Film-bound stimulation electrode arrays were placed in the subretinal space of micropigs. This enabled the retina to be stimulated subretinally. Since conventional visual evoked potential (VEP) measuring is virtually impossible in the pig from the neurosurgical point of view, epidural recording electrode arrays were positioned over the visual cortex as permanent electrodes. Results The feasibility of temporary implantation of film-bound stimulation electrode arrays was successfully demonstrated in the micropig model. On stimulation with monopolar voltage pulses (1000 to 3000 mV), reproducible epidural VEP measurements (5 to 10 μV) were detected. Conclusions The feasibility of subretinal stimulation of the retina was demonstrated in a retinal model that is similar to the human retina. This animal model therefore offers a suitable means of studying the tolerability of stimulation situations in the course of visual prosthesis development.

[1]  M. Wiener,et al.  Animal eyes. , 1957, The American orthoptic journal.

[2]  W. Dobelle,et al.  Phosphenes produced by electrical stimulation of human occipital cortex, and their application to the development of a prosthesis for the blind , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  R. H. Propst,et al.  Visual perception elicited by electrical stimulation of retina in blind humans. , 1996, Archives of ophthalmology.

[4]  A. Y. Chow,et al.  Subretinal electrical stimulation of the rabbit retina , 1997, Neuroscience Letters.

[5]  B. Hoefflinger,et al.  The development of subretinal microphotodiodes for replacement of degenerated photoreceptors. , 1997, Ophthalmic research.

[6]  J. Mortimer,et al.  Visual sensations produced by optic nerve stimulation using an implanted self-sizing spiral cuff electrode , 1998, Brain Research.

[7]  B. Hoefflinger,et al.  Subretinal Implants , 1998, Ophthalmic Research.

[8]  A. Y. Chow,et al.  The Subretinal Microphotodiode Array Retinal Prosthesis , 1998, Ophthalmic Research.

[9]  K Heimann,et al.  Successful long-term implantation of electrically inactive epiretinal microelectrode arrays in rabbits. , 1999, Retina.

[10]  Yoshiki Uchikawa,et al.  Efficient stimulation inducing neural activity in retinal implant , 1999, IEEE SMC'99 Conference Proceedings. 1999 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No.99CH37028).

[11]  E. Zrenner,et al.  Long-term survival of retinal cell cultures on retinal implant materials , 1999, Vision Research.

[12]  Malini Narayanan Nadig.  Development of a silicon retinal implant: cortical evoked potentials following focal stimulation of the rabbit retina with light and electricity , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  B. Hoefflinger,et al.  Reply to the Letter of Drs. Chow and Peachey: The Subretinal Microphotodiode Array Retinal Prosthesis II , 1999, Ophthalmic Research.

[14]  J. Weiland,et al.  Long-term histological and electrophysiological results of an inactive epiretinal electrode array implantation in dogs. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  D. J. Warren,et al.  A neural interface for a cortical vision prosthesis , 1999, Vision Research.

[16]  J. Weiland,et al.  Pattern electrical stimulation of the human retina , 1999, Vision Research.

[17]  Alan Y. Chow,et al.  The Subretinal Microphotodiode Array Retinal Prosthesis II , 1999, Ophthalmic Research.

[18]  Eberhart Zrenner,et al.  Studies on the feasibility of a subretinal visual prosthesis: data from Yucatan micropig and rabbit , 2001, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.