Emergence of Analogies in Collaboratively Conducted Computer Simulations

To learn by means of analogies, students have to see surface and deep structures in both source and target domains. Educators generally assume that students, presented with images, texts, video, or demonstrations, see what the curriculum designer intends them to see, that is, pick out and integrate information into their existing understanding. However, there is evidence that students do not see what they are supposed to see, which precisely inhibits them to learn what they are supposed to learn. In this extended case study, which exemplifies a successful multimedia application, 3 classroom episodes are used (a) to show how students in an advanced physics course do not see relevant information on the computer monitor; (b) to exemplify teaching strategies designed to allow relevant structures to become salient in students’ perception, allowing them to generate analogies and thereby learn; and (c) to exemplify how a teacher might assist students in bridging from the multimedia context to the real world.

[1]  Giuseppe Zollo,et al.  The Management of Grey Knowledge Through Causal Maps: A Field Example , 2007 .

[2]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Cognitive Supports for Analogies in the Mathematics Classroom , 2007, Science.

[3]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  Knowing What You Tell, Telling What You Know: Uncertainty and Asymmetries of Meaning in Interpreting Graphical Data , 2006 .

[4]  Panagiotis Germanakos,et al.  Cognitive and Emotional Processes in Web-based Education: Integrating Human Factors and Personalization , 2009 .

[5]  C. Goodwin.  Action and embodiment within situated human interaction , 2000 .

[6]  V. Gallese.  The Roots of Empathy: The Shared Manifold Hypothesis and the Neural Basis of Intersubjectivity , 2003, Psychopathology.

[7]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  On Distinguishing Epistemic from Pragmatic Action , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[8]  Yin Zhang.  Collaborative Learning in a Web-Based Environment: A Comparison Study , 2009 .

[9]  Wolff‐Michael Roth.  Bricolage, métissage, hybridity, heterogeneity, diaspora: concepts for thinking science education in the 21st century , 2008 .

[10]  Mingming Zhou,et al.  Designing Multimedia to Trace Goal Setting in Studying , 2009 .

[11]  E. Kikas.  University Students' Conceptions of Different Physical Phenomena , 2003 .

[12]  G Rizzolatti,et al.  The Space Around Us , 1997, Science.

[13]  Timothy K. Shih,et al.  Ubiquitous e-Learning With Multimodal Multimedia Devices , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[14]  Keith B. Lucas,et al.  Why May Students Fail To Learn from Demonstrations? A Social Practice Perspective on Learning in Physics. , 1997 .

[15]  Wu-Yuin Hwang,et al.  A study of multimedia annotation of Web-based materials , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[16]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Emergence, flexibility, and stabilization of language in a physics classroom , 2003 .

[17]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Fostering conceptual change by analogies—between Scylla and Charybdis. , 2001 .

[18]  G. Zollo,et al.  Organizational Cognition and Learning: Building Systems for the Learning Organization , 2007 .

[19]  C. Bereiter.  Toward a Solution of the Learning Paradox , 1985 .

[20]  R. Duit.  On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. , 1991 .