Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on human regional cerebral blood flow

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can up- and down-regulate cortical excitability depending on current direction, however our abilities to measure brain-tissue effects of the stimulation and its after-effects have been limited so far. We used regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF), a surrogate measure of brain activity, to examine regional brain-tissue and brain-network effects during and after tDCS. We varied the polarity (anodal and cathodal) as well as the current strength (0.8 to 2.0mA) of the stimulation. Fourteen healthy subjects were randomized into receiving either anodal or cathodal stimulation (two subjects received both, one week apart) while undergoing Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) in the MRI scanner with an alternating off-on sampling paradigm. The stimulating, MRI-compatible electrode was placed over the right motor region and the reference electrode over the contralateral supra-orbital region. SPM5 was used to process and extract the rCBF data using a 10mm spherical volume of interest (VOI) placed in the motor cortex directly underneath the stimulating scalp electrode. Anodal stimulation induced a large increase (17.1%) in rCBF during stimulation, which returned to baseline after the current was turned off, but exhibited an increase in rCBF again in the post-stimulation period. Cathodal stimulation induced a smaller increase (5.6%) during stimulation, a significant decrease compared to baseline (-6.5%) after cessation, and a continued decrease in the post-stimulation period. These changes in rCBF were all significant when compared to the pre-stimulation baseline or to a control region. Furthermore, for anodal stimulation, there was a significant correlation between current strength and the increase in rCBF in the on-period relative to the pre-stimulation baseline. The differential rCBF after-effects of anodal (increase in resting state rCBF) and cathodal (decrease in resting state rCBF) tDCS support findings of behavioral and cognitive after-effects after cathodal and anodal tDCS. We also show that tDCS not only modulates activity in the brain region directly underlying the stimulating electrode but also in a network of brain regions that are functionally related to the stimulated area. Our results indicate that ASL may be an excellent tool to investigate the effects of tDCS and its stimulation parameters on brain activity.

[1]  Patrick Ragert,et al.  Improvement of spatial tactile acuity by transcranial direct current stimulation , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  Sang Ho Ahn,et al.  Primary motor cortex activation by transcranial direct current stimulation in the human brain , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[3]  J. Tepper,et al.  Inhibitory control of neostriatal projection neurons by GABAergic interneurons , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  森脇 晃義.  Polarizing currents increase noradrenaline-elicited accumulation of cyclic AMP in rat cerebral cortex , 1991 .

[5]  Rolf Pohmann,et al.  Interleaved TMS/CASL: Comparison of different rTMS protocols , 2009, NeuroImage.

[6]  Gottfried Schlaug,et al.  Modulating activity in the motor cortex affects performance for the two hands differently depending upon which hemisphere is stimulated , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[7]  Christoph Mathys,et al.  Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Applied to Heschl's Gyrus Modulates Pitch Discrimination , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[8]  Giorgio Bonmassar,et al.  On the effect of resistive EEG electrodes and leads during 7 T MRI: simulation and temperature measurement studies. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[9]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Functional MRI of the immediate impact of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical and subcortical motor circuits , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[10]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex during fMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[11]  C. Capaday,et al.  Intensity modulation of TMS‐induced cortical excitation: Primary motor cortex , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Gottfried Schlaug,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: a noninvasive tool to facilitate stroke recovery , 2008, Expert review of medical devices.

[13]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  T. Freund,et al.  Total number and distribution of inhibitory and excitatory synapses on hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells , 2001, Neuroscience.

[15]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  J L Saumet,et al.  Vasodilatation in response to repeated anodal current application in the human skin relies on aspirin‐sensitive mechanisms , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  Yasuo Hori,et al.  Biphasic effects of polarizing current on adenosine-sensitive generation of cyclic AMP in rat cerebral cortex , 1990, Neuroscience Letters.

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A critique of functional localisers , 2006, NeuroImage.

[19]  M. Nitsche,et al.  [Modulation of cortical excitability by transcranial direct current stimulation]. , 2002, Der Nervenarzt.

[20]  S. Bestmann,et al.  On the synchronization of transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional echo‐planar imaging , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[21]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts tactile perception , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[22]  Gottfried Schlaug,et al.  Contralateral and ipsilateral motor effects after transcranial direct current stimulation , 2006, Neuroreport.

[23]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Dose-dependent reduction of cerebral blood flow during rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human sensorimotor cortex. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Peter T. Fox,et al.  Imaging human intra‐cerebral connectivity by PET during TMS , 1997, Neuroreport.

[25]  L. Bindman,et al.  The action of brief polarizing currents on the cerebral cortex of the rat (1) during current flow and (2) in the production of long‐lasting after‐effects , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  Felipe Fregni,et al.  Visual memory improved by non-invasive brain stimulation , 2010, Brain Research.

[27]  Masako Okamoto,et al.  Three-dimensional probabilistic anatomical cranio-cerebral correlation via the international 10–20 system oriented for transcranial functional brain mapping , 2004, NeuroImage.

[28]  L. Bindman,et al.  Long-lasting Changes in the Level of the Electrical Activity of the Cerebral Cortex produced by Polarizing Currents , 1962, Nature.

[29]  P. Matthews,et al.  Polarity-Sensitive Modulation of Cortical Neurotransmitters by Transcranial Stimulation , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  How does transcranial DC stimulation of the primary motor cortex alter regional neuronal activity in the human brain? , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[31]  D. Purpura,et al.  INTRACELLULAR ACTIVITIES AND EVOKED POTENTIAL CHANGES DURING POLARIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  M. A. Nitsche,et al.  Modulation kortikaler Erregbarkeit beim Menschen durch transkranielle Gleichstromstimulation , 2002, Der Nervenarzt.

[33]  Stefan Elmer,et al.  Behavioral and Brain Functions , 2009 .

[34]  N Accornero,et al.  Polarization of the human motor cortex through the scalp , 1998, Neuroreport.

[35]  S. Bestmann,et al.  Functional MRI of cortical activations induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) , 2001, Neuroreport.

[36]  G. Schlaug,et al.  Testing for causality with transcranial direct current stimulation: pitch memory and the left supramarginal gyrus , 2006, Neuroreport.

[37]  D. Alsop,et al.  Continuous flow‐driven inversion for arterial spin labeling using pulsed radio frequency and gradient fields , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[38]  Philippe A. Chouinard,et al.  Modulating neural networks with transcranial magnetic stimulation applied over the dorsal premotor and primary motor cortices. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological Modulation of Cortical Excitability Shifts Induced by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Humans , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[40]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[41]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Facilitation of Implicit Motor Learning by Weak Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex in the Human , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  J. Detre,et al.  Multisection cerebral blood flow MR imaging with continuous arterial spin labeling. , 1998, Radiology.

[43]  Pablo Celnik,et al.  Brain polarization enhances the formation and retention of motor memories. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  Yasuo Hori,et al.  Increase in the calcium level following anodal polarization in the rat brain , 1995, Brain Research.

[45]  C. J. Ploner,et al.  In Vivo Assessment of Human Visual System Connectivity with Transcranial Electrical Stimulation during Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2001, NeuroImage.

[46]  D. S. Williams,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using spin inversion of arterial water. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: a new treatment for depression? , 2002, Bipolar disorders.

[48]  Donald S. Williams,et al.  Perfusion imaging , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[49]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[50]  G. Aguirre,et al.  Experimental Design and the Relative Sensitivity of BOLD and Perfusion fMRI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[51]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Facilitation of probabilistic classification learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex in the human , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[52]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Time course of the induction of homeostatic plasticity generated by repeated transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[53]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Direct Current Stimulation over V5 Enhances Visuomotor Coordination by Improving Motion Perception in Humans , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Enhancing language performance with non-invasive brain stimulation—A transcranial direct current stimulation study in healthy humans , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[55]  Gottfried Schlaug,et al.  Dual-hemisphere tDCS facilitates greater improvements for healthy subjects' non-dominant hand compared to uni-hemisphere stimulation , 2008, BMC Neuroscience.

[56]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.