Gender Differences in Risk Assessment: Why do Women Take Fewer Risks than Men?

Across many real-world domains, men engage in more risky behaviors than do women. To examine some of the beliefs and preferences that underlie this difference, 657 participants assessed their likelihood of engaging in various risky activities relating to four different domains (gambling, health, recreation, and social), and reported their perceptions of (1) probability of negative outcomes, (2) severity of potential negative outcomes, and (3) enjoyment expected from the risky activities. Women’s greater perceived likelihood of negative outcomes and lesser expectation of enjoyment partially mediated their lower propensity toward risky choices in gambling, recreation, and health domains. Perceptions of severity of potential outcomes was a partial mediator in the gambling and health domains. The genders did not differ in their propensity towards taking social risks. A fifth domain of activities associated with high potential payoffs and fixed minor costs was also assessed. In contrast to other domains, women reported being more likely to engage in behaviors in this domain. This gender difference was partially mediated by women’s more optimistic judgments of the probability of good outcomes and of outcomes being more intensely positive.

[1]  S. Sitkin,et al.  Determinants of Risky Decision-Making Behavior: A Test of the Mediating Role of Risk Perceptions and Propensity , 1995 .

[2]  E. Weber,et al.  A Domain-Specific Risk-Attitude Scale: Measuring Risk Perceptions and Risk Behaviors , 2002 .

[3]  M Daly,et al.  Risk-taking, intrasexual competition, and homicide. , 2001, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[4]  B A Morrongiello,et al.  Age and gender differences in school-age children's appraisals of injury risk. , 1998, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[5]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Facts and Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk , 2005 .

[6]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  V. Konečni,et al.  Decision Processes and Risk Taking in Traffic: Driver Response to the Onset of Yellow Light , 1976 .

[8]  E. Weber,et al.  Perceived risk attitudes: relating risk perception to risky choice , 1997 .

[9]  R. Trivers Parental investment and sexual selection , 1972 .

[10]  Mark E. Slama,et al.  Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (2nd ed.) , 2005 .

[11]  David M. Messick,et al.  Environment, ethics, and behavior : the psychology of environmental valuation and degradation , 1998 .

[12]  William D. Schafer,et al.  Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. , 1999 .

[13]  F. W. Irwin,et al.  Stated expectations as functions of probability and desirability of outcomes. , 1953, Journal of personality.

[14]  Lawrence S. Sugiyama Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind , 2001 .

[15]  E. Weber Who’s Afraid of a Little Risk? New Evidence for General Risk Aversion , 1999 .

[16]  E U Weber,et al.  Dimensions of risk perception for financial and health risks. , 1993, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  G. A. Marcoulides,et al.  A First Course in Structural Equation Modeling , 2000 .

[18]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits , 2000 .

[19]  Charles W. Mathias,et al.  Impulsiveness and risk-taking behavior: comparison of high-school and college students using the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale , 1996 .

[20]  R. Jervis Perception and misperception in international politics , 1976 .

[21]  M. Harris Sex and ethnic differences in past aggressive behaviors , 1992, Journal of Family Violence.

[22]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  P. Slovic Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[24]  Elke U. Weber,et al.  Beyond a Trait View of Risk Taking: A Domain-Specific Scale Measuring Risk Perceptions, Expected Benefits, and Perceived-Risk Attitudes in German-Speaking Populations , 2004 .

[25]  Barbara A. Mellers,et al.  Representations of Risk Judgments , 1994 .

[26]  I. Waldron,et al.  Trends in gender differences in accidents mortality: relationships to changing gender roles and other societal trends. , 2005 .

[27]  F. Gibbons,et al.  Predicting young adults' health risk behavior. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  How bad is a 10% chance of losing a toe? Judgments of probabilistic conditions by doctors and laypeople , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[29]  P. Slovic,et al.  A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[30]  Melissa L. Finucane,et al.  Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[31]  P. Slovic Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk‐Assessment Battlefield , 1999, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[32]  D. G. Pruitt,et al.  STRENGTH OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE VALUE OF AN EVENT AND ITS SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITY AS A FUNCTION OF METHOD OF MEASUREMENT. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[33]  Y. Ganzach,et al.  Judging Risk and Return of Financial Assets. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[34]  B. Campbell Forces and Strategies in Evolution. (Book Reviews: Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971) , 1972 .

[35]  Ronald G. Stansfield,et al.  Sociological Methodology 1982 , 1983 .