A locomotive’s dynamic response to in-service parameter variations of its hydraulic yaw damper

An improved hydraulic yaw damper model with series in-service clearance and comprehensive stiffness was proposed by Wang et al. (Nonlinear Dyn 65(1–2):13–34 2011). In order to study how in-service parameter variations to the hydraulic yaw damper affect the dynamics of a Chinese $$\hbox {SS}_{9}$$SS9 locomotive, this study continued that research by establishing a multibody system (MBS) model of the $$\hbox {SS}_{9}$$SS9 locomotive–rail coupling system, and then validating the MBS model using field test data from the $$\hbox {SS}_{9}$$SS9. Extensive simulations were performed, and the results demonstrated that both the effective stiffness and the small clearance accumulated between two ends of the damper due to wear and lack of maintenance had remarkable impacts on the locomotive’s critical speed and on its normal operation. The results also influenced the locomotive’s ride comfort, but the effect of the small clearance was more remarkable than that of the effective stiffness in this regard, and these parameters had little to no influence on the locomotive’s curve-negotiation performance. The small clearance and effective stiffness are usually omitted or simplified in engineering, and so it was important to apply the proposed in-service nonlinear damper model with series clearance and stiffness to a vehicle dynamics study and improve the accuracy of vehicle design. The study was also useful for setting pertinent vehicle maintenance standards in engineering to control the influence of such in-service parameter variations.

[1]  Hiroshi Fujimoto,et al.  Lateral Vibration and its Decreasing Measure of a Shinkansen Train(Decrease of Train Vibration with Yaw Damper between Cars) , 1996 .

[2]  T. X. Mei,et al.  Combined active steering and traction for mechatronic bogie vehicles with independently rotating wheels , 2002 .

[3]  M. Ahmadian,et al.  Nonlinear investigation of the effect of suspension parameters on the hunting stability of a railway truck , 2006, Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/ASME Joint Rail Conference.

[4]  J. Vinolas,et al.  Advances on railway yaw damper characterisation exposed to small displacements , 2006 .

[5]  Hassan Sayyaadi,et al.  A new model in rail–vehicles dynamics considering nonlinear suspension components behavior , 2009 .

[6]  G. Schupp,et al.  Virtual prototyping: the future way of designing railway vehicles , 1999 .

[7]  Ahmed A. Shabana,et al.  A Survey of Rail Vehicle Track Simulations and Flexible Multibody Dynamics , 2001 .

[8]  Oskar Wallrapp,et al.  Review of Past Developments in Multibody System Dynamics at DLR – From FADYNA to SIMPACK , 2004 .

[9]  Yung-Chang Cheng,et al.  Hunting stability analysis of high-speed railway vehicle trucks on tangent tracks , 2005 .

[10]  Jalil R. Sany Accurate Rail Vehicle Dynamic Simulations by DynaRail , 2004 .

[11]  Gunter Schupp Simulation of Railway Vehicles: Necessities and Applications , 2003 .

[12]  Yung Chang Cheng,et al.  Hunting Stability Analysis of a New High-Speed Railway Vehicle Model Moving on Curved Tracks , 2007 .

[13]  Zhao Wen-zhong Stability Analyses of High-Speed Bogie Based on Anti-Hunting Damper Failures , 2011 .

[14]  Berta Suarez,et al.  Sensitivity analysis to assess the influence of the inertial properties of railway vehicle bodies on the vehicle's dynamic behaviour , 2013 .

[15]  Hi Sung Lee,et al.  Assessment of running safety of railway vehicles using multibody dynamics , 2010 .

[16]  Roger M. Goodall,et al.  Modelling Requirements for the Design of Active Stability Control Strategies for a High Speed Bogie , 2004 .

[17]  Krzysztof Zboinski,et al.  Self-exciting vibrations and Hopf's bifurcation in non-linear stability analysis of rail vehicles in a curved track , 2010 .

[18]  D J Thompson,et al.  Fundamentals of Rail Vehicle Dynamics: Guidance and Stability , 2004 .

[19]  Anton Stribersky,et al.  Structural dynamics and ride comfort of a rail vehicle system , 2002 .

[20]  Alex Eichberger,et al.  TMPT: multi-body package SIMPACK , 2007 .

[21]  Wenlin Wang,et al.  Non-linear parametric modelling of a high-speed rail hydraulic yaw damper with series clearance and stiffness , 2011 .

[22]  Mikael Wrang INSTABILITY PHENOMENA OF A PASSENGER COACH, CAUSED BY INTERNAL YAW DAMPER FLEXIBILITY , 1999 .