Imaging task-based optimal kV and mA selection for CT radiation dose reduction: from filtered backprojection (FBP) to statistical model based iterative reconstruction (MBIR)

Optimal selections of tube potential (kV) and tube current (mA) are essential in maximizing the diagnostic potential of a given CT technology while minimizing radiation dose. The use of a lower tube potential may improve image contrast, but may also require a significantly higher tube current to compensate for the rapid decrease of tube output at lower tube potentials. Therefore, the selection of kV and mA should take those kinds of constraints as well as the specific diagnostic imaging task in to consideration. For conventional quasi-linear CT systems employing linear filtered back-projection (FBP) image reconstruction algorithm, the optimization of kV-mA combinations are relatively straightforward, as neither spatial resolution nor noise texture has significant dependence on kV and mA settings. In these cases, zero-frequency analysis such as contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) or normalized CNR by dose (CNRD) can be used for optimal kV-mA selection. The recently introduced statistical model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) method, however, has introduced new challenges to optimal kV and mA selection, as both spatial resolution and noise texture become closely correlated with kV and mA. In this work, a task-based approach based on modern signal detection theory and the corresponding frequency-dependent analysis has been proposed to perform the kV and mA optimization for both FBP and MBIR. By performing exhaustive measurements of task-based detectability index through the technically accessible kV-mA parameter space, iso-detectability contours were generated and overlaid on top of iso-dose contours, from which the kV-mA pair that minimize dose yet still achieving the desired detectability level can be identified.

[1]  Frank Dong,et al.  Optimization of kVp and mAs for pediatric low-dose simulated abdominal CT: is it best to base parameter selection on object circumference? , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[3]  Guang-Hong Chen,et al.  Statistical model based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in clinical CT systems. Part II. Experimental assessment of spatial resolution performance. , 2014, Medical physics.

[4]  Ke Li,et al.  Statistical model based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in clinical CT systems: experimental assessment of noise performance. , 2014, Medical physics.

[5]  Ulf Nyman,et al.  Eighty-peak kilovoltage 16-channel multidetector computed tomography and reduced contrast-medium doses tailored to body weight to diagnose pulmonary embolism in azotaemic patients , 2006, European Radiology.

[6]  Willi A Kalender,et al.  Application- and patient size-dependent optimization of x-ray spectra for CT. , 2009, Medical physics.

[7]  Natalie N. Braun,et al.  Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. , 2009, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[8]  Bernhard Schmidt,et al.  Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape. , 2004, Radiology.

[9]  Annet Waaijer,et al.  Circle of Willis at CT angiography: dose reduction and image quality--reducing tube voltage and increasing tube current settings. , 2007, Radiology.

[10]  Willi A. Kalender,et al.  Computed tomography : fundamentals, system technology, image quality, applications , 2000 .

[11]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Hypervascular liver tumors: low tube voltage, high tube current multi-detector row CT for enhanced detection--phantom study. , 2008, Radiology.

[12]  J. Paul,et al.  Low-kilovoltage multi-detector row chest CT in adults: feasibility and effect on image quality and iodine dose. , 2004, Radiology.

[13]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: System and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms. , 2012, Medical physics.

[14]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination. , 1981, Science.

[15]  I Reiser,et al.  SU-E-I-46: Sample-Size Dependence of Model Observers for Estimating Low-Contrast Detection Performance From CT Images. , 2014, Medical physics.

[16]  John M Boone,et al.  Dose reduction in pediatric CT: a rational approach. , 2003, Radiology.

[17]  Kazuo Awai,et al.  Radiation dose reduction without degradation of low-contrast detectability at abdominal multisection CT with a low-tube voltage technique: phantom study. , 2005, Radiology.

[18]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detectability with two noise components: anomalous masking effects. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[19]  C E Metz,et al.  Digital image processing: effect on detectability of simulated low-contrast radiographic patterns. , 1984, Radiology.

[20]  Joel G Fletcher,et al.  Automatic selection of tube potential for radiation dose reduction in CT: a general strategy. , 2009, Medical physics.

[21]  S. Schaller,et al.  Aorto-iliac multidetector-row CT angiography with low kV settings: improved vessel enhancement and simultaneous reduction of radiation dose , 2005, European Radiology.

[22]  W Huda,et al.  Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT. , 2000, Radiology.