............................................................................................................................... 1 1 Introducing inanimate unergatives ...................................................................................... 2 1.1 The domain of intransitive verbs ..................................................................................... 2 1.2 The domain of inanimate unergatives .......................................................................... 4 1.3 The mapping problem .................................................................................................. 8 1.4 The transitive alternate problem ................................................................................... 9 2 Theoretical Framework .................................................................................................... 11 2.1 -system: semantic vocabulary .................................................................................. 12 2.2 -system: operations on -grid ................................................................................... 14 2.3 -system: mapping procedures................................................................................... 16 3 The mapping problem ...................................................................................................... 19 3.1 Previous accounts ...................................................................................................... 20 3.1.1 Inanimate unergatives are internally caused (L&R 1995) .................................... 20 3.1.2 Inanimate unergatives are base-generated as intransitives, unaccusatives are derived (Reinhart 2002) ............................................................................................... 22 3.2 Main hypothesis: the subject of inanimate unergatives is an inanimate cause [+c –m] 24 3.2.1 The main hypothesis ........................................................................................... 24 3.2.2 The “Caused-NP” experiment ............................................................................. 27 3.2.3 Method and procedures ....................................................................................... 29 3.2.4 Results ................................................................................................................ 30 3.2.5 Discussion .......................................................................................................... 31 3.3 Accounting for the mapping problem ......................................................................... 32 4 The transitive alternate problem ....................................................................................... 34 4.1 Previous accounts ...................................................................................................... 36 4.1.1 Unrelated, underived verb meanings (L&R 1995) ............................................... 36 4.1.2 The transitive alternate is formed by causativization (Reinhart 2002) .................. 36 4.2 The solution of the transitive alternate problem: the Agent-Instrument pattern ........... 40 4.3 Inanimate unergatives in English ............................................................................... 46 4.4 Causativization vs. Agent-Instrument alternations ..................................................... 50 5 Summary.......................................................................................................................... 57 Appendix A: The Causal Implication Questionnaire ("Caused-NP" test) ............................. 60 A.1 The questionnaire: (originally in Hebrew) ................................................................. 60 A.2 Results ...................................................................................................................... 63 Appendix B: cross linguistic evidence (Russian) ................................................................. 65 Bibliography ....................................................................................................................... 67
[1]
David R. Dowty.
Thematic proto-roles and argument selection
,
1991
.
[2]
A. Sorace.
Gradients in Auxiliary Selection with Intransitive Verbs.
,
2000
.
[3]
G. Chierchia,et al.
A Semantics for Unaccusatives and its Syntactic Consequences
,
2004
.
[4]
HANS KAMP,et al.
REMARKS ON LEXICAL STRUCTURE AND DRS CONSTRUCTION
,
1994
.
[5]
David M. Perlmutter.
Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis
,
1978
.
[6]
Beth Levin,et al.
Argument Realization
,
2005
.
[7]
T. Reinhart,et al.
The Lexicon-Syntax Parameter: Reflexivization and Other Arity Operations
,
2005,
Linguistic Inquiry.
[8]
T. Reinhart,et al.
Against the unaccusative analysis of reflexives
,
1999
.
[9]
Tanya Reinhart,et al.
The Theta System – an overview
,
2003
.
[10]
Luigi Burzio,et al.
Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach
,
1986
.