An assessment of the quality of vaccination data produced through smart paper technology in The Gambia.

INTRODUCTION MyChild Solution is an innovative Electronic Immunisation Register (EIR) reliant on Smart Paper Technology, thereby eliminating the need for electronic devices and internet connectivity at the point-of-care. The goal of this study is to characterise the quality of routine immunisation data generated using MyChild Solution compared to data obtained through the conventional health management information system (HMIS) used in The Gambia. METHOD We used the World Health Organization's (WHO) Data Quality Review (DQR) Toolkit to evaluate MyChild Solution's data quality in the 19 health facilities across two regions implementing MyChild Solution in The Gambia at the time of the evaluation. We evaluated all applicable data quality metrics as well as additional metrics of interest, including the incidence of recording errors, the incidence of incomplete indicator level data, and implausible dates. Where possible, we compared results to those of the conventional HMIS. RESULTS Both MyChild Solution and the conventional HMIS produced 100% complete and timely data in their reference years. Both systems had no moderate or extreme outliers and showed the expected Penta 1 to Penta 3 dropout direction. However, the proportion of verification factors that are not acceptable was higher in the conventional HMIS. MyChild Solution was found to near perfectly (99.98%) digitise scanned documents. These and other data quality indicators evaluated demonstrate that MyChild Solution produces high quality data with high completeness, timeliness, and consistency compared to the conventional HMIS system. CONCLUSION MyChild Solution produces high quality data as per the DQR Toolkit metrics and other metrics of interest of interest. The more internally consitent data produced through MyChild Solution compared to the conventional HMIS demonstrates its potential for supporting data-driven decision-making in immunisation.

[1]  R. G. Parrish,et al.  Electronic health records and US public health: current realities and future promise. , 2013, American journal of public health.

[2]  Marcela Contreras,et al.  Improving immunization data quality in Peru and Mexico: Two case studies highlighting challenges and lessons learned , 2018, Vaccine.

[3]  H. Luzze,et al.  Factors that affect immunization data quality in Kabarole District, Uganda , 2018, PloS one.

[4]  Theo Lippeveld,et al.  PRISM framework: a paradigm shift for designing, strengthening and evaluating routine health information systems , 2009, Health policy and planning.

[5]  H. Goossens,et al.  Coverage of the expanded program on immunization in Vietnam: Results from 2 cluster surveys and routine reports , 2015, Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics.

[6]  N. Umar,et al.  Quality of routine facility data for monitoring priority maternal and newborn indicators in DHIS2: A case study from Gombe State, Nigeria , 2019, PloS one.

[7]  Yu Hu,et al.  Auditing the Immunization Data Quality from Routine Reports in Shangyu District, East China , 2016, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[8]  S. Omoleke,et al.  A pilot study of routine immunization data quality in Bunza Local Government area: causes and possible remedies , 2017, The Pan African medical journal.

[9]  M. C. Danovaro-Holliday,et al.  Electronic immunization registries in Latin America: progress and lessons learned. , 2014, Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health.

[10]  Nargis Rahimi,et al.  Factors limiting data quality in the expanded programme on immunization in low and middle-income countries: A scoping review. , 2020, Vaccine.

[11]  M. Karami,et al.  Accuracy and quality of immunization data in Iran: findings from data quality self-assessment survey in 2017 , 2019, BMC Health Services Research.

[12]  Electronic Immunization Registries in Tanzania and Zambia: Shaping a Minimum Viable Product for Scaled Solutions , 2019, Front. Public Health.

[13]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  Monitoring global health: time for new solutions , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  Theo Lippeveld,et al.  Evaluation of the Performance of Routine Information System Management (PRISM) framework: evidence from Uganda , 2010, BMC health services research.

[15]  C. Hanson,et al.  Assessment of a novel scanner-supported system for processing of child health and immunization data in Uganda , 2020, BMC Health Services Research.