Application of dose compensation in image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer

In image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT), volumetric information on patient anatomy at treatment conditions is made available with in-room imaging devices capable of cone-beam CT. Setup error and inter-fraction rigid motion can be corrected online. The planning margin can therefore be reduced significantly. However, to compensate for uncertainties including organ deformation and intra-fraction motion, offline evaluation and replanning are necessary. The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of an offline dose compensation technique to further reduce the margin safely. In IGRT, online CT scan, rigid image registration and setup correction are performed at each fraction. Later the regions of interest are registered offline between treatment and planning CTs using a finite element method to account for non-rigid organ motion. Cumulative dose distribution is calculated and compared with the prescription dose. The discrepancy, if found significant, is repaired using the dose compensation technique, in which the cumulative dose distribution is incorporated in adaptive IMRT planning for future fractions. Two compensation schedules were tested in this study: single compensation at the end of the treatment course and compensation performed weekly. One patient with one planning CT and 16 treatment CTs were used in this simulation study. Due to the aggressive smaller planning margin used, severe underdose was observed in the clinical target volume. The size and magnitude of the underdose were reduced substantially with online guidance but were still significant. Both dose compensation strategies were able to reduce the dose deficit to an acceptable level without additional planning margin. Weekly compensation is more biologically beneficial and can spread the execution error into multiple fractions. The offline dose compensation technique allows further margin reduction and can complement the online guidance by compensating for uncertainties that cannot be reduced online, thereby increasing the confidence in IGRT delivery.

[1]  M van Herk,et al.  Quantification of organ motion during conformal radiotherapy of the prostate by three dimensional image registration. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  R Mohan,et al.  Conformal radiation treatment of prostate cancer using inversely-planned intensity-modulated photon beams produced with dynamic multileaf collimation. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  J A Antolak,et al.  Prostate target volume variations during a course of radiotherapy. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  A. Brahme,et al.  An adaptive control algorithm for optimization of intensity modulated radiotherapy considering uncertainties in beam profiles, patient set-up and internal organ motion. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  D. Yan,et al.  A model to accumulate fractionated dose in a deforming organ. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  D Yan,et al.  An off-line strategy for constructing a patient-specific planning target volume in adaptive treatment process for prostate cancer. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  P. Munro,et al.  Clinical use of electronic portal imaging: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 58. , 2001, Medical physics.

[8]  Jan J W Lagendijk,et al.  Measurements and clinical consequences of prostate motion during a radiotherapy fraction. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  Randall K Ten Haken,et al.  Daily prostate targeting using implanted radiopaque markers. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  D. Yan,et al.  Reducing uncertainties in volumetric image based deformable organ registration. , 2003, Medical physics.

[11]  R. Mohan,et al.  Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas. I: dosimetric results. , 2003, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.

[12]  F Nüsslin,et al.  Adapting inverse planning to patient and organ geometrical variation: algorithm and implementation. , 2003, Medical physics.

[13]  Michael G Herman,et al.  Technical aspects of daily online positioning of the prostate for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy using an electronic portal imaging device. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  H. Rehbinder,et al.  Adaptive radiation therapy for compensation of errors in patient setup and treatment delivery. , 2004, Medical physics.

[15]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas: II--clinical results. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Prostate gland motion assessed with cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI). , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  David A Jaffray,et al.  Emergent technologies for 3-dimensional image-guided radiation delivery. , 2005, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[18]  Qiuwen Wu,et al.  Geometric and dosimetric evaluations of an online image-guidance strategy for 3D-CRT of prostate cancer. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.