Understanding Online Financial Communities: What constitutes a Valuable Information Exchange for Users?

Financial service providers continually struggle to attract and maintain customer interest in their company-hosted virtual communities. These are expected to improve the low level of individual involvement and emotional attachment to financial products and services. Based on Bandura’s (1986) social cognitive theory, we argue that the content and type of user interaction associated with a created environment influences the level of user issue involvement, which embodies the user’s interest in and valuation of the content associated with a virtual community. In particular we examine whether the range of topics, types of contribution and responsiveness of interactions are contributors to the overall level of interest of users in virtual financial communities. Our results, derived from an inductive content analysis based on 8,855 posts from 1,447 users across three virtual financial communities, show that specific topics discussed in a virtual community can have a significant positive influence on a user’s overall topic interest. Moreover, a significant positive relationship was found between the type of contribution (e.g., questions, statements or answers) and the extent of a user’s topic interest. Furthermore, our results reveal that the timeliness of responses influences a users topic interest in a positive way. However, the overall number of responses related to a specific topic does not play a significant role in any of the communities analysed. This research contributes to a better understanding of virtual communities in the service industry and provides evidence of the importance of content as key driver for user involvement.

[1]  Jagannath Aghav,et al.  Visualizing semantic web , 2012, CUBE.

[2]  Roger W. H. Bons,et al.  Satisfaction with virtual communities in B2B financial services: social dynamics, content and technology , 2014, Electron. Mark..

[3]  Yulin Fang,et al.  Exploring the role of psychological safety in promoting the intention to continue sharing knowledge in virtual communities , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[4]  Carlos Flavián,et al.  Promoting Consumer's Participation in Virtual Brand Communities: A New Paradigm in Branding Strategy , 2008 .

[5]  David Gefen,et al.  Virtual Community Attraction: Why People Hang Out Online , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[6]  Marcelo Royo-Vela,et al.  The influence of belonging to virtual brand communities on consumers' affective commitment, satisfaction and word-of-mouth advertising: The ZARA case , 2011, Online Inf. Rev..

[7]  Jyh-Jeng Wu,et al.  Trust factors influencing virtual community members: A study of transaction communities , 2010 .

[8]  Xuemin Lin,et al.  Efficient Graph Similarity Joins with Edit Distance Constraints , 2012, 2012 IEEE 28th International Conference on Data Engineering.

[9]  Michael Martin,et al.  Facilitating the Exploration and Visualization of Linked Data , 2014, Linked Open Data.

[10]  Joachim Baumeister,et al.  On the Semantification of 5-Star Technical Documentation , 2015, LWA.

[11]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[12]  G. Hutton Net gain: Expanding markets through virtual communities , 1998 .

[13]  Martin Hepp,et al.  GoodRelations: An Ontology for Describing Products and Services Offers on the Web , 2008, EKAW.

[14]  Daniel Oberle,et al.  How ontologies benefit enterprise applications , 2014, Semantic Web.

[15]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  Ontology-based Information Visualization , 2002, Visualizing the Semantic Web.

[16]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Asynchronous learning networks as a virtual classroom , 1997, CACM.

[17]  J. Zaichkowsky Conceptualizing Involvement , 1986 .

[18]  A. Herrmann,et al.  The Social Influence of Brand Community: Evidence from European Car Clubs , 2005 .

[19]  Quentin Jones,et al.  An empirical study of critical mass and online community survival , 2010, CSCW '10.

[20]  A. Bandura Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[21]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches , 1981 .

[22]  Yves Lacouture,et al.  Decision-tree models of categorization response times, choice proportions, and typicality judgments. , 2009, Psychological review.

[23]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Research Note - The Impact of Community Commitment on Participation in Online Communities , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[25]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Customers’ preference of online store visit strategies: an investigation of demographic variables , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Frank Puppe,et al.  CoverageCity: Test Coverage for Clinical Guidelines , 2012, KESE@ECAI.

[27]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Dwayne D. Gremler,et al.  Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? , 2004 .

[29]  Jens Lehmann,et al.  Managing the Life-Cycle of Linked Data with the LOD2 Stack , 2012, SEMWEB.

[30]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[31]  Anna Smith Problems of conflict management in virtual communities , 2002 .

[32]  David Gefen,et al.  The impact of developer responsiveness on perceptions of usefulness and ease of use: an extension of the technology acceptance model , 1998, DATB.

[33]  C. Barnatt Virtual communities and financial services ‐ on‐line business potentials and strategic choice , 1998 .

[34]  Carlos Flavián,et al.  The impact of participation in virtual brand communities on consumer trust and loyalty: The case of free software , 2007, Online Inf. Rev..

[35]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[36]  Tao Zhou,et al.  Understanding Online Community User Participation: A Social Influence Perspective , 2011, Internet Res..

[37]  Akrivi Katifori,et al.  Ontology visualization methods—a survey , 2007, CSUR.

[38]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Leading Collaboration in Online Communities , 2015, MIS Q..

[39]  M. Fox,et al.  A Product Ontology , 2022 .

[40]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Audience Involvement in Advertising: Four Levels , 1984 .

[41]  Joachim Baumeister,et al.  Semantification of Large Corpora of Technical Documentation , 2016 .

[42]  Sara Kiesler Interpreting Soap Operas and Creating Community: Inside a Electronic Fan Culture , 2014 .

[43]  Edward Shih-Tse Wang,et al.  Investigating member commitment to virtual communities using an integrated perspective , 2012, Internet Res..

[44]  Cristian Bucur,et al.  A comparison between several NoSQL databases with comments and notes , 2011, 2011 RoEduNet International Conference 10th Edition: Networking in Education and Research.

[45]  David Gefen,et al.  Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[46]  C. Flavián,et al.  The influence of virtual communities on distribution strategies in the internet , 2005 .

[47]  Suresh K. Nair,et al.  Operations in Financial Services—An Overview , 2010 .

[48]  Hishammuddin Asmuni,et al.  Design and Implementation of Product Structure Ontology , 2013 .