The biological and clinical value of p53 expression in pelvic high‐grade serous carcinomas

Studies on the p53 expression and outcome for women with ovarian carcinoma have produced conflicting results. The observed heterogeneity may be due to the range of cut‐offs used to define overexpression and the mix of histotypes of the study cohorts. We aimed to examine the association between p53 expression and biological properties of tumours as well as outcome in 502 pelvic high‐grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) derived from two population‐based cohorts from British Columbia representing cases with or without residual tumour after initial surgery, respectively, and one clinical trial cohort from Germany (AGO‐OVAR‐3). p53 expression was assessed on tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry using the DO‐7 antibody. p53 expression was scored in three tiers as complete loss of expression, focal expression or overexpression (defined as more than 50% positive tumour cell nuclei) and correlated with survival using multivariate Cox regression models. p53 was completely absent in 30.3%, focally expressed in 12.0%, and overexpressed in 57.7% of HGSCs, which was an inverse pattern compared to clear cell and endometrioid types of ovarian carcinomas, where 76% and 69% of cases showed focal expression, respectively (p < 0.001, chi square test). Pelvic HGSCs show either complete absence of p53 expression or p53 overexpression in 88% of cases; thus, aberrant p53 expression is a ubiquitous feature of HGSCs. HGSCs with p53 overexpression were associated with a reduced risk of recurrence compared to cases with complete absence of p53 in the British Columbia cohort with residual tumour (HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.51–0.99) and for a combination of all three cohorts (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.55–0.89) in multivariate analysis including age, stage, residual tumour, and stratification by cohort. The association of complete absence of p53 expression with unfavourable outcome suggests functional differences of TP53 mutations underlying overexpression, compared to those underlying complete absence of expression. Copyright © 2010 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  D. Huntsman,et al.  Differences in Tumor Type in Low-stage Versus High-stage Ovarian Carcinomas , 2010, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[2]  Carlos Caldas,et al.  Driver mutations in TP53 are ubiquitous in high grade serous carcinoma of the ovary , 2010, The Journal of pathology.

[3]  C. Harris,et al.  Clinical outcomes and correlates of TP53 mutations and cancer. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[4]  A. Mes-Masson,et al.  Characterization of the molecular differences between ovarian endometrioid carcinoma and ovarian serous carcinoma , 2010, The Journal of pathology.

[5]  L. Tanoue Cancer Statistics, 2009 , 2010 .

[6]  D. Huntsman,et al.  Tumor type and substage predict survival in stage I and II ovarian carcinoma: insights and implications. , 2010, Gynecologic oncology.

[7]  Richard Berendt,et al.  Implementation of a Canadian External Quality Assurance Program for Breast Cancer Biomarkers: An Initiative of Canadian Quality Control in Immunohistochemistry (cIQc) and Canadian Association of Pathologists (CAP) National Standards Committee/Immunohistochemistry , 2009, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[8]  C. Gilks,et al.  Ovarian carcinoma pathology and genetics: recent advances. , 2009, Human pathology.

[9]  E. D. de Vries,et al.  Modest effect of p53, EGFR and HER-2/neu on prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  C. Crum Intercepting pelvic cancer in the distal fallopian tube: Theories and realities , 2009, Molecular oncology.

[11]  D. Huntsman,et al.  The Fallopian Tube: Primary Site of Most Pelvic High-grade Serous Carcinomas , 2009, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[12]  A. Parwani Tumor cell type can be reproducibly diagnosed and is of independent prognostic significance in patients with maximally debulked ovarian carcinoma , 2009 .

[13]  A. Crijns,et al.  Modest effect of p 53 , EGFR and HER-2 / neu on prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer : a meta-analysis , 2009 .

[14]  S. Leung,et al.  Ovarian Carcinoma Subtypes Are Different Diseases: Implications for Biomarker Studies , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[15]  D. Huntsman,et al.  Critical molecular abnormalities in high-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary , 2008, Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine.

[16]  J. Manola,et al.  TP53 mutations and survival in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  D. Huntsman,et al.  Kisspeptin and GPR54 immunoreactivity in a cohort of 518 patients defines favourable prognosis and clear cell subtype in ovarian carcinoma , 2007, BMC medicine.

[18]  Mark F. Munsell,et al.  Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability of a Two-tier System for Grading Ovarian Serous Carcinoma , 2007, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[19]  I. Shih,et al.  Assessment of TP53 mutation using purified tissue samples of ovarian serous carcinomas reveals a higher mutation rate than previously reported and does not correlate with drug resistance , 2007, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[20]  P. Hall,et al.  Assessing p53 in clinical contexts: unlearned lessons and new perspectives , 2006, The Journal of pathology.

[21]  B. Vojtesek,et al.  Discriminating functional and non‐functional p53 in human tumours by p53 and MDM2 immunohistochemistry , 2005, The Journal of pathology.

[22]  L. Cope,et al.  Patterns of p53 Mutations Separate Ovarian Serous Borderline Tumors and Low- and High-grade Carcinomas and Provide Support for a New Model of Ovarian Carcinogenesis: A Mutational Analysis With Immunohistochemical Correlation , 2005, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[23]  N. Hacker,et al.  Cyclin D1, p53, and p21Waf1/Cip1 Expression Is Predictive of Poor Clinical Outcome in Serous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[24]  D. Huntsman,et al.  Interpretation of p53 Immunoreactivity in Endometrial Carcinoma: Establishing a Clinically Relevant Cut-Off Level , 2004, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[25]  N. Hacker,et al.  Cyclin D 1 , p 53 , and p 21 Waf 1 / Cip 1 Expression Is Predictive of Poor Clinical Outcome in Serous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer , 2004 .

[26]  J. Lundin,et al.  Distinct subtypes of serous ovarian carcinoma identified by p53 determination. , 2003, Gynecologic oncology.

[27]  A. Berchuck,et al.  Prognostic significance of p53 mutation and p53 overexpression in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  T. Bauknecht,et al.  A randomized clinical trial of cisplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel as first-line treatment of ovarian cancer. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[29]  M. Leversha,et al.  Expression of p53, pRB, and p16 in lung tumours: a validation study on tissue microarrays , 2003, The Journal of pathology.

[30]  M. Saegusa,et al.  Possible associations among expression of p14ARF, p16INK4a, p21WAF1/CIP1, p27KIP1, and p53 accumulation and the balance of apoptosis and cell proliferation in ovarian carcinomas , 2001, Cancer.

[31]  Y. Hsieh,et al.  p53 mutation is infrequent in clear cell carcinoma of the ovary. , 2001, Gynecologic oncology.

[32]  A. Sood,et al.  The prognostic significance of p53 tumor suppressor gene alterations in ovarian carcinoma , 2000, Cancer.

[33]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.