Energy versus economic effectiveness in CHP (combined heat and power) applications: Investigation on the critical role of commodities price, taxation and power grid mix efficiency

Starting from PES (primary energy saving) and CSR (cost saving ratio) definitions the work pinpoints a “grey area” in which CHP (combined heat and power – cogeneration) units can operate with profit and negative PES. In this case, CHP can be profitably operated with lower efficiency with respect to separate production of electrical and thermal energy. The work defines the R-index as the ratio between the cost of fuel and electricity. The optimal value of R-index for which CHP units operate with both environmental benefit (PES > 0) and economic profitability (CSR > 0) is the reference value of electrical efficiency, ηel_ref, of separate production (national power grid mix). As a consequence, optimal R-index varies from Country to Country. The work demonstrates that the value of R corresponds to the minimum value of electrical efficiency for which any power generator operates with profit. The paper demonstrates that, with regard to the profitability of cogeneration, the ratio between the cost of commodities is more important than their absolute value so that different taxation of each commodity can be a good leverage for energy policy makers to promote high efficiency cogeneration, even in the absence of an incentive mechanism. The final part of the study presents an analysis on micro-CHP technologies payback times for different European Countries.

[1]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  The Benefit of Regional Diversification of Cogeneration Investments in Europe: A Mean-Variance Portfolio Analysis , 2009 .

[2]  Massimiliano Renzi,et al.  Modelling the Italian household sector at the municipal scale: Micro-CHP, renewables and energy efficiency , 2014 .

[3]  Neven Duić,et al.  An analysis of the legal and market framework for the cogeneration sector in Croatia , 2009 .

[4]  Francisco José Jiménez-Espadafor Aguilar,et al.  Prediction of performance, energy savings and increase in profitability of two gas turbine steam gen , 2011 .

[5]  Gabriele Comodi,et al.  Energy production from landfill biogas: An italian case , 2011 .

[6]  Matan Shnaiderman,et al.  Cogeneration versus natural gas steam boiler: A techno-economic model , 2014 .

[7]  Giovanni Ciampi,et al.  Energy, environmental and economic dynamic performance assessment of different micro-cogeneration systems in a residential application , 2013 .

[8]  José Antonio Moya Impact of support schemes and barriers in Europe on the evolution of cogeneration , 2013 .

[9]  M. Gargiulo,et al.  Municipal scale scenario: Analysis of an Italian seaside town with MarkAL-TIMES , 2012 .

[10]  Massimiliano Renzi,et al.  Use of a test-bed to study the performance of micro gas turbines for cogeneration applications , 2011 .

[11]  Andrea Lanzini,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of PEMFC and SOFC micro-CHP fuel cell systems for the residential sector , 2015 .

[12]  Francisco José Jiménez-Espadafor Aguilar,et al.  Analysis of regulation methods of a combined heat and power plant based on gas turbines , 2014 .

[13]  Massimiliano Renzi,et al.  A survey of cogeneration in the Italian pulp and paper sector , 2013 .

[14]  Marco Badami,et al.  Energetic and economic assessment of cogeneration plants: A comparative design and experimental condition study , 2014 .

[15]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Development of cogeneration in Germany: A mean-variance portfolio analysis of individual technology , 2011 .

[16]  Enrique Rosales-Asensio,et al.  Cogeneration and district heating networks: Measures to remove institutional and financial barriers that restrict their joint use in the EU-28 , 2015 .

[17]  A. Campos-Celador,et al.  Parametric study of the operational and economic feasibility of Stirling micro-cogeneration devices in Spain , 2014 .

[18]  Marilyn A Brown,et al.  Reviving manufacturing with a federal cogeneration policy , 2013 .

[19]  Flavio Caresana,et al.  Energy and economic analysis of an ICE-based variable speed-operated micro-cogenerator , 2011 .

[20]  Vedran Kirincic,et al.  Cogeneration – Investment dilemma , 2012 .

[21]  Chris Underwood,et al.  Simulation of energy use in buildings with multiple micro generators , 2014 .

[22]  Han Xu,et al.  Analysis of a 1 kW residential combined heating and power system based on solid oxide fuel cell , 2013 .

[23]  Adam Hawkes,et al.  Fuel cell micro-CHP techno-economics: Part 1- model concept and formulation , 2009 .

[24]  Marilyn A Brown,et al.  The job generation impacts of expanding industrial cogeneration , 2015 .

[25]  John Holmberg,et al.  On the potential trade-offs between energy supply and end-use technologies for residential heating , 2013 .

[26]  Hongbo Ren,et al.  Economic and environmental evaluation of micro CHP systems with different operating modes for residential buildings in Japan , 2010 .

[27]  Andrzej Ziębik,et al.  Optimal coefficient of the share of cogeneration in district heating systems , 2012 .

[28]  J.M.A. Myrzik,et al.  Estimation of the economic addressable market of micro-CHP and heat pumps based on the status of the residential building sector in Germany , 2014 .

[29]  Christos A. Frangopoulos,et al.  A method to determine the power to heat ratio, the cogenerated electricity and the primary energy savings of cogeneration systems after the European Directive , 2012 .