Profitable and dynamically feasible operating point selection for constrained processes

Abstract The operating point of a typical chemical process is determined by solving a non-linear optimization problem where the objective is to minimize an economic cost subject to constraints. Often, some or all of the constraints at the optimal solution are active, i.e., the solution is constrained. Though it is profitable to operate at the constrained optimal point, it might lead to infeasible operation due to uncertainties. Hence, industries try to operate the plant close to the optimal point by “backing-off” to achieve the desired economic benefits. Therefore, the primary focus of this paper is to present an optimization formulation for solving the dynamic back-off problem based on an economic cost function. In this regard, we work within a stochastic framework that ensures feasible dynamic operating region within the prescribed confidence limit. In this work, we aim to reduce the economic loss due to the back-off by simultaneously solving for the operating point and a compatible controller that ensures feasibility. Since the resulting formulation is non-linear and non-convex, we propose a novel two-stage iterative solution procedure such that a convex problem is solved at each step in the iteration. Finally, the proposed approach is demonstrated using case studies.

[1]  J. D. Perkins,et al.  Process control structure selection based on economics , 2000 .

[2]  S. Janardhanan,et al.  LOCAL SELF-OPTIMIZING CONTROL WITH AVERAGE LOSS MINIMIZATION , 2008 .

[3]  John D. Perkins,et al.  Structural design for on‐line process optimization: I. Dynamic economics of MPC , 1999 .

[4]  Sigurd Skogestad,et al.  Optimal selection of sensor network and backed-off operating point based on economics , 2013, 2013 European Control Conference (ECC).

[5]  J. A. Bandoni,et al.  Economic impact of disturbances and uncertain parameters in chemical processes—A dynamic back-off analysis , 1996 .

[6]  D. Chmielewski,et al.  On the Tuning of Predictive Controllers: Inverse Optimality and the Minimum Variance Covariance Constrained Control Problem , 2004 .

[7]  John D. Perkins,et al.  Economic analysis of different structures of on-line process optimization systems , 1998 .

[8]  Christopher L.E. Swartz,et al.  On the effects of constraints, economics and uncertain disturbances on dynamic operability assessment , 1996 .

[9]  John D. Perkins,et al.  Structural design for on‐line process optimization: II. Application to a simulated FCC , 1999 .

[10]  Sigurd Skogestad,et al.  Economic back-off selection based on optimal multivariable controller , 2012 .

[11]  Jui-Kun Peng,et al.  Optimal sensor network design using the minimally backed-off operating point notion of profit , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005, American Control Conference, 2005..

[12]  Donald J. Chmielewski,et al.  On the Tuning of Predictive Controllers: The Minimum Back-Off Operating Point Selection Problem , 2005 .

[13]  Geoff Barton,et al.  Interaction between process design and process control: economic analysis of process dynamics , 1991 .

[14]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[15]  R. B. Newell,et al.  Applied Process Control: A Case Study , 1989 .

[16]  J. D. Perkins,et al.  Selection of process control structure based on linear dynamic economics , 1993 .

[17]  Parisa A. Bahri,et al.  Back-off calculations in optimising control: A dynamic approach , 1995 .

[18]  J. A. Bandoni,et al.  Effect of disturbances in optimizing control: Steady‐state open‐loop backoff problem , 1996 .