On the data analysis for classification of elementary upper limb movements

PurposeBody worn inertial sensors could be used to assess rehabilitation of patients with impaired upper limb motor control by detecting and classifying how many times particular arm movements (exercises) are made during normal activities. We present a systematic exploration to determine such a system.MethodsKinematic data was collected from 18 healthy subjects using tri-axial inertial sensors (accelerometers and gyroscopes) located at two positions on the dominant arm as four fundamental arm movements were repeated 20 times each. Ten time domain features were extracted from individual and combinations of sensor axes data, and were used to train a classifier. Three different classifiers were investigated: linear discriminant analysis (LDA), quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) and support vector machine (SVM). Each was verified using a leave-one-subject-out technique for a generalized classification model, and a ten-fold cross validation technique for a personalized classification model.ResultsLDA repeatedly gave the better results when using features extracted from individual sensor axes data. When a personalized learning model is used with LDA, only a single tri-axial sensor (accelerometer or gyroscope) is required to classify all four of the upper limb movements with a sensitivity in the range 92–100%, using as few as 6-10 time-domain features. By comparison, the generalized model using LDA exhibited lower sensitivity and generally required more features (12–18), reflecting the greater variability inherent in a training set comprised of more than one individual’s data.ConclusionsWe demonstrate that body worn inertial sensors can classify elementary arm movements using a low complexity algorithm.

[1]  Hongnian Yu,et al.  Elderly activities recognition and classification for applications in assisted living , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[2]  Edward D Lemaire,et al.  Effect of mobility devices on orientation sensors that contain magnetometers. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[3]  Mahesh S. Raisinghani,et al.  Ambient Intelligence: Changing Forms of Human-Computer Interaction and their Social Implications , 2006, J. Digit. Inf..

[4]  W. Wang,et al.  A Comparative Study of Feature-Salience Ranking Techniques , 2001, Neural Computation.

[5]  Billur Barshan,et al.  Comparative study on classifying human activities with miniature inertial and magnetic sensors , 2010, Pattern Recognit..

[6]  Yacine Challal,et al.  Rehabilitation supervision using wireless sensor networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks.

[7]  Héctor Pomares,et al.  Daily living activity recognition based on statistical feature quality group selection , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  Cecilio Angulo,et al.  Online motion recognition using an accelerometer in a mobile device , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[10]  Dapeng Wu,et al.  Feature extraction through local learning , 2009, Stat. Anal. Data Min..

[11]  Marcela D. Rodríguez,et al.  Activity Inference for Ambient Intelligence Through Handling Artifacts in a Healthcare Environment , 2012, Sensors.

[12]  Ilkka Korhonen,et al.  Detection of Daily Activities and Sports With Wearable Sensors in Controlled and Uncontrolled Conditions , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[13]  S. Wolf,et al.  Pilot normative database for the Wolf Motor Function Test. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  Daniel Tik-Pui Fong,et al.  The Use of Wearable Inertial Motion Sensors in Human Lower Limb Biomechanics Studies: A Systematic Review , 2010, Sensors.

[15]  Ig-Jae Kim,et al.  Mobile health monitoring system based on activity recognition using accelerometer , 2010, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[16]  Johannes Peltola,et al.  Activity classification using realistic data from wearable sensors , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[17]  Pedro Antonio Gutiérrez,et al.  Sensitivity Versus Accuracy in Multiclass Problems Using Memetic Pareto Evolutionary Neural Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[18]  Derek Partridge,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Input Features in a Feedforward Neural Network , 2000, Neural Computing & Applications.

[19]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines , 2002, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[20]  Kamiar Aminian,et al.  Ambulatory system for human motion analysis using a kinematic sensor: monitoring of daily physical activity in the elderly , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Shyamal Patel,et al.  A Novel Approach to Monitor Rehabilitation Outcomes in Stroke Survivors Using Wearable Technology , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[22]  Koushik Maharatna,et al.  Towards the development of next-generation remote healthcare system: Some practical considerations , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[23]  Michel Vacher,et al.  SVM-Based Multimodal Classification of Activities of Daily Living in Health Smart Homes: Sensors, Algorithms, and First Experimental Results , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[24]  Isabelle Guyon,et al.  An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[25]  S Armstrong,et al.  Wireless connectivity for health and sports monitoring: a review , 2007, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[26]  Adrian Burns,et al.  SHIMMER™ – A Wireless Sensor Platform for Noninvasive Biomedical Research , 2010, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[27]  E. Taub,et al.  The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[28]  Paul Lukowicz,et al.  Gesture spotting with body-worn inertial sensors to detect user activities , 2008, Pattern Recognit..

[29]  Steven L Wolf,et al.  The Excite Trial: relationship of intensity of constraint induced movement therapy to improvement in the wolf motor function test. , 2007, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[30]  Koushik Maharatna,et al.  On the Trade-Off of Accuracy and Computational Complexity for Classifying Normal and Abnormal ECG in Remote CVD Monitoring Systems , 2012, 2012 IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems.

[31]  Daijin Kim,et al.  Simultaneous Gesture Segmentation and Recognition based on Forward Spotting Accumulative HMMs , 2006, 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'06).

[32]  Weihua Sheng,et al.  Motion- and location-based online human daily activity recognition , 2011, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[33]  김형곤,et al.  ADL Classification Using Triaxial Accelerometers and RFID , 2007 .

[34]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Siftables: towards sensor network user interfaces , 2007, TEI.