Influence of global climate model selection on runoff impact assessment.

Summary The future rainfall series used to drive hydrological models in many climate change impact on runoff studies are informed by rainfall simulated by global climate models (GCMs). This paper assesses how the choice of GCMs based on their abilities to reproduce the observed historical rainfall can affect runoff impact assessment. The 23 GCMs used in IPCC 4AR are considered together with 1961–2000 observed rainfall data over southeast Australia. The results indicate that most of the GCMs can reproduce the observed spatial mean annual rainfall pattern, but the errors in the mean seasonal and annual rainfall amounts can be significant. The future mean annual rainfall projections averaged across southeast Australia range from −10% to +3% change per degree global warming, which is amplified as −23% to +4% change in the future mean annual runoff. There is no clear difference in the future rainfall projections between the better and poorer GCMs based on their abilities to reproduce the observed historical rainfall, therefore using only the better GCMs or weights to favour the better GCMs give similar runoff impact assessment results as the use of all the 23 GCMs. The range of future runoff in impact assessment studies is probably best determined using future rainfall projections from the majority of available archived GCM simulations.

[1]  J. Vaze,et al.  Estimating climate change impact on runoff across southeast Australia: Method, results, and implications of the modeling method , 2009 .

[2]  D. Thompson,et al.  Australian Rainfall and Surface Temperature Variations Associated with the Southern Hemisphere Annular Mode , 2007 .

[3]  V. Singh,et al.  Application and testing of the simple rainfall-runoff model SIMHYD , 2002 .

[4]  Demetris Koutsoyiannis,et al.  On the credibility of climate predictions , 2008 .

[5]  Vincent R. Gray.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[6]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[7]  V. Singh,et al.  Mathematical models of small watershed hydrology and applications. , 2002 .

[8]  S. Charles,et al.  A two‐parameter climate elasticity of streamflow index to assess climate change effects on annual streamflow , 2007 .

[9]  P. Waggoner.  Climate change and US water resources. , 1990 .

[10]  P. Whetton,et al.  Australian climate change projections derived from simulations performed for the IPCC 4th Assessment Report , 2007 .

[11]  M. Collins,et al.  El Niño in a changing climate: a multi-model study , 2005 .

[12]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[13]  Dennis P. Lettenmaier,et al.  Hydrologic sensitivities of the Sacramento‐San Joaquin River Basin, California, to global warming , 1990 .

[14]  T. Wigley,et al.  Influences of precipitation changes and direct CO2 effects on streamflow , 1985, Nature.

[15]  John O. Carter,et al.  Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , 2001, Environ. Model. Softw..

[16]  I. Watterson,et al.  Calculation of probability density functions for temperature and precipitation change under global warming , 2008 .

[17]  A. Sankarasubramanian,et al.  Climate elasticity of streamflow in the United States , 2001 .

[18]  W. Cai,et al.  An interpretation of Australian rainfall projections , 2008 .

[19]  T. D. Mitchell,et al.  Pattern Scaling: An Examination of the Accuracy of the Technique for Describing Future Climates , 2003 .

[20]  F. Chiew,et al.  Estimation of rainfall elasticity of streamflow in Australia , 2006 .

[21]  T. Reichler,et al.  How Well Do Coupled Models Simulate Today's Climate? , 2008 .

[22]  Yongqiang Zhang,et al.  Relative merits of different methods for runoff predictions in ungauged catchments , 2009 .

[23]  Francis H. S. Chiew,et al.  Modelling the impacts of climate change on Australian streamflow , 2002 .

[24]  Chong-Yu Xu,et al.  Climate Change and Hydrologic Models: A Review of Existing Gaps and Recent Research Developments , 1999 .

[25]  P. E. Waggoner,et al.  From climate to flow. , 1990 .

[26]  Muyin Wang,et al.  Future climate of the north Pacific Ocean , 2007 .

[27]  A. Pitman,et al.  Evaluation of the AR4 Climate Models’ Simulated Daily Maximum Temperature, Minimum Temperature, and Precipitation over Australia Using Probability Density Functions , 2007 .