An inertia model for the adoption of new farming practices

Nutrient emissions from agricultural land are now widely recognized as one of the key contributors to poor water quality in local lakes, rivers and streams. Nutrient trading has been suggested as a regulatory tool to improve and protect water quality. However, farmers’ attitudes suggest that they are resistant to making the changes required under such a scheme. This paper develops a model of farmers’ resistance to change and their adoption of new management practices under nutrient trading regulation. We specify resistance as a bound on the adoption of new practices and allow this bound to relax as farmers’ resistance to change weakens. This paper reflects current work in progress as part of the author’s Master’s Thesis. Future work will extend and build upon the material presented here. We request that readers refer to this paper only in the absence of a more recent version. This paper has been prepared for the purposes of the New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society conference August 2012.

[1]  Sendhil Mullainathan,et al.  Learning Through Noticing: Theory and Experimental Evidence in Farming , 2012 .

[2]  R. Coase,et al.  The Problem of Social Cost , 1960, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[3]  Susan A. Murphy,et al.  Monographs on statistics and applied probability , 1990 .

[4]  Timothy G. Conley,et al.  Learning About a New Technology: Pineapple in Ghana , 2010 .

[5]  Z. Griliches.  HYBRID CORN: AN EXPLORATION IN THE ECONOMIC OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE , 1957 .

[6]  L. Prokopy,et al.  Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: a meta-analysis of the adoption literature. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[7]  W. Proctor,et al.  Designing, testing and implementing a trial dryland salinity credit trade scheme , 2008 .

[8]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[9]  M. Selman,et al.  Water Quality Trading Programs : An International Overview , 2009 .

[10]  Glenn Ellison,et al.  Rules of Thumb for Social Learning , 1993, Journal of Political Economy.

[11]  D. Staiger,et al.  Technology Adoption from Hybrid Corn to Beta Blockers , 2005 .

[12]  Thomas Berger,et al.  Agent-based spatial models applied to agriculture: A simulation tool , 2001 .

[13]  JR Bryant,et al.  Description and evaluation of the Farmax Dairy Pro decision support model , 2010 .

[14]  R. Bellman.  Dynamic programming. , 1957, Science.

[15]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge.  Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[16]  Atanu Saha,et al.  He came, he saw, (and) he waited: an empirical analysis of inertia in technology adoption , 1998 .

[17]  Isabelle Sin.  The Adoption of Environmentally Friendly Technologies in Agriculture , 2012 .

[18]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Learning by Doing and Learning from Others: Human Capital and Technical Change in Agriculture , 1995, Journal of Political Economy.

[19]  S. Ram.  A Model of Innovation Resistance , 1987 .

[20]  Frédérick Garcia,et al.  Modelling the Complexity of the Cropping Plan Decision-making , 2010 .

[21]  D. Pannell,et al.  Nonpoint pollution policy evaluation under ambiguity , 2009 .

[22]  Imran Rasul,et al.  Social Networks and Technology Adoption in Northern Mozambique , 2002 .

[23]  Suzi Kerr,et al.  Policy-Induced Technology Adoption: Evidence from the U.S. Lead Phasedown , 2001 .

[24]  G. Marshall,et al.  Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders , 2006 .

[25]  Suzi Kerr,et al.  Does Complex Hydrology Require Complex Water Quality Policy? Nmanager Simulations for Lake Rotorua , 2011 .

[26]  Kaivan Munshi.  Social learning in a heterogeneous population: technology diffusion in the Indian Green Revolution , 2004 .

[27]  T. Tietenberg.  Emissions Trading: Principles and Practice , 2006 .

[28]  Richard D. Horan,et al.  Economic and Ecological Rules for Water Quality Trading 1 , 2011 .

[29]  Anne Case,et al.  Modeling Technology Adoption in Developing Countries , 1993 .

[30]  K. Fisher-Vanden,et al.  A New Approach to Water Quality Trading: Applying Lessons from the Acid Rain Program to the Lower Boise River Watershed , 2004 .

[31]  Margaret Brown,et al.  Involvement and Decision Making On-farm: The Use of Wintering Feedpads and Nitrogen Inhibitors on Dairy Farms in New Zealand , 2009 .

[32]  Nitrogen Trading in Lake Taupo: An Analysis and Evaluation of an Innovative Water Management Policy , 2015 .

[33]  Peter N. Ireland.  Technology Shocks in the New Keynesian Model , 2004 .

[34]  Frank Proschan,et al.  Optimum Replacement of a System Subject to Shocks , 1983, Oper. Res..

[35]  S. Carpenter,et al.  NONPOINT POLLUTION OF SURFACE WATERS WITH PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN , 1998 .

[36]  D. Smeaton,et al.  Relationships between farm productivity, profitability, N leaching and GHG emissions: a modelling approach , 2011 .

[37]  Thomas D. Crocker,et al.  Cooperative and noncooperative protection against transferable and filterable externalities , 1991 .

[38]  James S. Dyer,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing? , 1999, Oper. Res..