Downsizing an orbital space robot: A dynamic system based evaluation

Abstract Small space robots have the potential to revolutionise space exploration by facilitating the on-orbit assembly of infrastructure, in shorter time scales, at reduced costs. Their commercial appeal will be further improved if such a system is also capable of performing on-orbit servicing missions, in line with the current drive to limit space debris and prolong the lifetime of satellites already in orbit. Whilst there have been a limited number of successful demonstrations of technologies capable of these on-orbit operations, the systems remain large and bespoke. The recent surge in small satellite technologies is changing the economics of space and in the near future, downsizing a space robot might become be a viable option with a host of benefits. This industry wide shift means some of the technologies for use with a downsized space robot, such as power and communication subsystems, now exist. However, there are still dynamic and control issues that need to be overcome before a downsized space robot can be capable of undertaking useful missions. This paper first outlines these issues, before analyzing the effect of downsizing a system on its operational capability. Therefore presenting the smallest controllable system such that the benefits of a small space robot can be achieved with current technologies. The sizing of the base spacecraft and manipulator are addressed here. The design presented consists of a 3 link, 6 degrees of freedom robotic manipulator mounted on a 12U form factor satellite. The feasibility of this 12U space robot was evaluated in simulation and the in-depth results presented here support the hypothesis that a small space robot is a viable solution for in-orbit operations.

[1]  Evangelos Papadopoulos,et al.  Smooth Planning for Free-floating Space Robots Using Polynomials , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  Alex Ellery,et al.  The case for robotic on-orbit servicing of spacecraft: Spacecraft reliability is a myth , 2008 .

[3]  Marcello Romano,et al.  Laboratory experiments of resident space object capture by a spacecraft–manipulator system , 2017 .

[4]  Richard Rembala,et al.  Robotic assembly and maintenance of future space stations based on the ISS mission operations experience , 2009 .

[5]  Filippo Graziani,et al.  Small launch platforms for micro-satellites , 2018, Advances in Space Research.

[6]  Daniel Alazard,et al.  Modeling and control of a space robot for active debris removal , 2015 .

[7]  Wenfu Xu,et al.  Hybrid modeling and analysis method for dynamic coupling of space robots , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[8]  Christian S. Sallaberger,et al.  Canadian space robotic activities , 1997 .

[9]  James R. Wertz,et al.  Space Mission Analysis and Design , 1992 .

[10]  R. Boumans,et al.  The European Robotic Arm for the International Space Station , 1998, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[11]  Xi Wang,et al.  Dynamics and control of capture of a floating rigid body by a spacecraft robotic arm , 2015 .

[12]  Shiyin Qin,et al.  Kinematic Modeling for a Class of Free-Floating Space Robots , 2017, IEEE Access.

[13]  Ou Ma,et al.  A review of space robotics technologies for on-orbit servicing , 2014 .

[14]  Eric Joffre,et al.  RemoveDEBRIS: An in-orbit active debris removal demonstration mission , 2016 .

[15]  Jianjun Luo,et al.  Dynamic coupling analysis of multi-arm space robot , 2019, Acta Astronautica.

[16]  Luis F. Peñín,et al.  Force reflection for ground control of Space robots , 2000, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[17]  D. N. Nenchev,et al.  Reaction Null Space of a multibody system with applications in robotics , 2013 .

[18]  Jaime Gallardo-Alvarado,et al.  A novel three degrees of freedom partially decoupled robot with linear actuators , 2012, Robotica.

[19]  Saptarshi Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Robotics and AI-Enabled On-Orbit Operations With Future Generation of Small Satellites , 2018, Proceedings of the IEEE.