Estimating total net primary productivity of managed grasslands by a state-space modeling approach in a small catchment on the Loess Plateau, China

Managed grasslands are important for stabilizing soil and reducing soil erosion on sloping lands. In order to obtain information for better grassland management and soil protection at small scales, managed grassland total net primary productivity (TNPP) data were collected and analyzed with a first order state-space approach and a classical linear regression approach. The objective was to determine the effects of soil properties and site elevation on managed grassland TNPP. Soil water content (SWC), soil bulk density (BD), saturated soil hydraulic conductivity (Ks), soil temperature (T), soil clay content (CC), soil organic carbon (SOC), soil NO(3)-N, soil NH(4)-N, soil Olsen phosphorus concentration (OP) and site elevation (SE) data were collected along a 300-m transect in the China Loess Plateau. Soil properties and site elevation were evaluated in bi- and multivariate autoregressive state-space analysis to clarify the key factors affecting the spatial distribution of TNPP. Results show that most of the measured variables contributed to the variation of TNPP. CC and OP were especially helpful in describing the spatial pattern of TNPP. The state-space modeling results were compared with classical statistics methodologies, indicating that the state-space approach described the spatial pattern of TNPP much better than the equivalent classical regression methods. All of the TNPP variation was represented by state-space models that included soil NO(3)-N and OP or soil CC and OP. Only 76% of the variance of the TNPP was represented by classical statistics analysis because the classical statistics did not include sampling position and assumed sample independence. State-space models are recommended for studying spatial relations between vegetation and soil variables in natural soil-plant systems on the China Loess Plateau. (c) 2010 Elsevier E.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  F. J. Pierce,et al.  Emerging Concepts for Solving the Enigma of Precision Farming Research , 1999 .

[2]  K. Bronson,et al.  Cotton lint yield variability in a heterogeneous soil at a landscape scale , 2001 .

[3]  A. Leyshon.  Effect of rate of nitrogen fertilizer on the above- and below-ground biomass of irrigated bromegrass in southwest Saskatchewan , 1991 .

[4]  D. R. Nielsen,et al.  Soil variability: infiltration relations of agroecosystems , 1998 .

[5]  Luís Carlos Timm,et al.  Interação solo-planta avaliada por modelagem estatística de espaço de estados , 2000 .

[6]  S. Running,et al.  A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications I. Hydrologic balance, canopy gas exchange and primary production processes , 1988 .

[7]  Robert Costanza,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem services: A multi-scale empirical study of the relationship between species richness and net primary production , 2007 .

[8]  M. Shao,et al.  Temporal changes of an alfalfa succession and related soil physical properties on the Loess Plateau, China , 2009 .

[9]  Ole Wendroth,et al.  Predicting yield of barley across a landscape: a state-space modeling approach , 2003 .

[10]  R. Keane,et al.  Simulating effects of fire on northern Rocky Mountain landscapes with the ecological process model FIRE-BGC. , 1996, Tree physiology.

[11]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Using simple environmental variables to estimate below-ground productivity in grasslands , 2002 .

[12]  F. Morkoc,et al.  Analysis of Soil Water Content and Temperature Using State‐space Approach , 1985 .

[13]  Y. Kuzyakov,et al.  Carbon input by plants into the soil. Review. , 2000 .

[14]  H. Odum,et al.  Primary Productivity of the Biosphere , 1978, Ecological Studies.

[15]  R. Sanderson,et al.  Association between lowland grassland plant communities and soil properties , 2002 .

[16]  D. Gowing,et al.  Available soil phosphorus in semi-natural grasslands: Assessment methods and community tolerances , 2009 .

[17]  H. Seino,et al.  Agroclimatic Evaluation of Net Primary Productivity of Natural Vegetations , 1985 .

[18]  R. Shumway.  Applied Statistical Time Series Analysis , 1988 .

[19]  Yun-qiang Wang,et al.  A preliminary investigation of the dynamic characteristics of dried soil layers on the Loess Plateau of China , 2010 .

[20]  Changhui Peng,et al.  Modelling the response of net primary productivity (NPP) of boreal forest ecosystems to changes in climate and fire disturbance regimes , 1999 .

[21]  Xiaorong Wei,et al.  Effects of two perennials, fallow and millet on distribution of phosphorous in soil and biomass on sloping loess land, China , 2009 .

[22]  M. Wassen,et al.  Endangered plants persist under phosphorus limitation , 2005, Nature.

[23]  H. Janzen,et al.  An approach for estimating net primary productivity and annual carbon inputs to soil for common agricultural crops in Canada , 2007 .

[24]  Robert H. Shumway,et al.  TIME- AND FREQUENCY‐DOMAIN ANALYSES OF FIELD OBSERVATIONS1 , 1989 .

[25]  Shao Ming’an,et al.  Spatial distribution and conditional simulation of soil pH values in small watershed of loessial gully region. , 2009 .

[26]  M. Rosenzweig.  Net Primary Productivity of Terrestrial Communities: Prediction from Climatological Data , 1968, The American Naturalist.

[27]  S. Running,et al.  Contrasting Climatic Controls on the Estimated Productivity of Global Terrestrial Biomes , 1998, Ecosystems.

[28]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  Forest Ecosystems: Analysis at Multiple Scales , 1985 .

[29]  S. Running,et al.  FOREST-BGC, A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications. II. Dynamic carbon allocation and nitrogen budgets. , 1991, Tree physiology.

[30]  E. Box.  Estimating the seasonal carbon source-sink geography of a natural, steady-state terrestrial biosphere , 1988 .

[31]  Ole Wendroth,et al.  State-space approach to spatial variability of crop yield , 1992 .

[32]  K. Walker,et al.  Enhancing diversity of species-poor grasslands: an experimental assessment of multiple constraints , 2006 .

[33]  A. McGuire,et al.  Productivity response of climax temperate forests to elevated temperature and carbon dioxide: a north american comparison between two global models , 1993 .

[34]  J. Timmer,et al.  Spatial analysis of earthworm biodiversity at the regional scale , 2006 .

[35]  State-space approach to evaluate the relation between soil physical and chemical properties , 2004 .

[36]  D. R. Nielsen,et al.  A comparison of two methods to predict the landscape-scale variation of crop yield , 2001 .

[37]  D. R. Nielsen,et al.  State-space prediction of field-scale soil water content time series in a sandy loam , 1999 .

[38]  Gary Paul Nabhan,et al.  Restoration Biology: A Population Biology Perspective , 1997 .

[39]  Sugarcane production evaluated by the state-space approach , 2003 .