Valid Two-Step Identification-Robust Confidence Sets for GMM

In models with potentially weak identification, researchers often decide whether to report a robust confidence set based on an initial assessment of model identification. Two-step procedures of this sort can generate large coverage distortions for reported confidence sets, and existing procedures for controlling these distortions are quite limited. This paper introduces a generally applicable approach to detecting weak identification and constructing two-step confidence sets in GMM. This approach controls coverage distortions under weak identification and indicates strong identification, with probability tending to 1 when the model is well identified.

[1]  J. Geanakoplos,et al.  Generalized Instrumental Variables Estimation of Nonlinear Rational Expectations Models , 2007 .

[2]  Sydney C. Ludvigson,et al.  Euler Equation Errors , 2005 .

[3]  É. Renault,et al.  Testing identification strength , 2020, Journal of Econometrics.

[4]  D. Andrews,et al.  Estimation and Inference with Weak, Semi-Strong, and Strong Identification , 2010 .

[5]  J. L. M. Olea,et al.  A Robust Test for Weak Instruments , 2013 .

[6]  W. Newey,et al.  A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelationconsistent Covariance Matrix , 1986 .

[8]  Isaiah Andrews Conditional Linear Combination Tests for Weakly Identified Models , 2016 .

[9]  Weak instruments and the first stage F-statistic in IV models with a nonscalar error covariance structure , 2010 .

[10]  L. Hansen,et al.  Finite Sample Properties of Some Alternative Gmm Estimators , 2015 .

[11]  Robert J. Shiller,et al.  Cointegration and Tests of Present Value Models , 1987, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  H. White A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[13]  D. Andrews,et al.  Generic Results for Establishing the Asymptotic Size of Confidence Sets and Tests , 2011, Journal of Econometrics.

[14]  V. Chernozhukov,et al.  Finite Sample Inference for Quantile Regression Models , 2006 .

[15]  Jonathan H. Wright,et al.  GMM WITH WEAK IDENTIFICATION , 2000 .

[16]  A. Timmermann Cointegration tests of present value models with a time‐varying discount factor , 1995 .

[17]  Marcelo J. Moreira A Conditional Likelihood Ratio Test for Structural Models , 2003 .

[18]  W. Newey,et al.  Large sample estimation and hypothesis testing , 1986 .

[19]  Eric Zivot,et al.  A New Method of Projection-Based Inference in GMM with Weakly Identified Nuisance Parameters , 2008 .

[20]  Frank Kleibergen,et al.  Testing Parameters in GMM without Assuming that they are identified , 2005 .

[21]  J. Stock,et al.  Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments , 1994 .